Author Archives: Hall

CT: Dismissal not appropriate remedy here for violation of A-C privilege in execution of SW

Defendant did not show that all the documents seized were attorney-client privileged for purposes of litigation. Some were. However, dismissal is not the appropriate remedy, despite the fact privileged information made it into the media from the arrest warrant materials. … Continue reading →

Posted in Overseizure, Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CT: Dismissal not appropriate remedy here for violation of A-C privilege in execution of SW

D.Minn.: Defense counsel’s failure to inform def of potential 4A claims isn’t itself an IAC claim

“Williams’ assertion that counsel failed to inform him that state law enforcement officers are not authorized to make federal arrests provides no support for a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.” Considering the merits of any search claim, defendant’s stop … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Defense counsel’s failure to inform def of potential 4A claims isn’t itself an IAC claim

CA1: Drunk underage partiers puking outside and going back in justified a community caretaking entry to see if anyone was in distress

Drunk underage partiers puking outside and going back in justified a community caretaking entry to see if anyone was in distress. Castagna v. Jean, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 11357 (1st Cir. Apr. 10, 2020). The use of an administrative warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Community caretaking function, Seizure | Comments Off on CA1: Drunk underage partiers puking outside and going back in justified a community caretaking entry to see if anyone was in distress

IL: Bailee of vehicle has no authority to open or permit search of sealed packages or containers inside

A bailment of a vehicle doesn’t give the bailee the authority to consent or open sealed packages or containers inside. People v. Ortega, 2020 IL App (1st) 162516, 2020 Ill. App. LEXIS 236 (Apr. 10, 2020):

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on IL: Bailee of vehicle has no authority to open or permit search of sealed packages or containers inside

IL: Failure to show nexus even by inference of def’s connection to premises in SW was a failure of PC

The state failed to show nexus between defendant and the place to be searched that would show that defendant kept drugs on the premises. “To be sure, a judge issuing a search warrant is entitled to draw reasonable inferences from … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreign searches, Nexus | Comments Off on IL: Failure to show nexus even by inference of def’s connection to premises in SW was a failure of PC

CA6: Officer in SW affidavit doesn’t have to state he was trained in recognizing odor of MJ

The officer did not have to specify in the affidavit for search warrant that he had specialized training in detecting the smell of marijuana for there to be probable cause. The government showed by a preponderance of the evidence the … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Officer in SW affidavit doesn’t have to state he was trained in recognizing odor of MJ

Nature Human Behaviour: A large-scale analysis of racial disparities in police stops across the United States

Nature Human Behaviour: A large-scale analysis of racial disparities in police stops across the United States by Emma Pierson et al.:

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on Nature Human Behaviour: A large-scale analysis of racial disparities in police stops across the United States

D.N.M.: Vehicle already searched under the automobile exception can be searched again at police station

A vehicle already searched under the automobile exception can be searched again after it is removed to the police lot. United States v. Mazon, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64813 (D. N.M. Apr. 13, 2020). The Texas trial court didn’t err … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Vehicle already searched under the automobile exception can be searched again at police station

HI: Repeated announcement outside tent before entry with SW satisfied knock-and-announce requirement; def was hearing impaired and slept through it

Defendant lived in a park in a “tent,” under a tarp with gaps that officers could somewhat see inside. Officers had a search warrant and they announced loudly several times their office and purpose. There was no door to knock … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Knock and announce | Comments Off on HI: Repeated announcement outside tent before entry with SW satisfied knock-and-announce requirement; def was hearing impaired and slept through it

TX: State statutory requirement of legible magistrate’s signature subject to GFE

Code of Criminal Procedure Article 18.04(5) requires, in part, that a search warrant contain a legible magistrate’s signature. So what effect does an illegible magistrate’s signature have upon the applicability of the statutory good-faith exception? See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on TX: State statutory requirement of legible magistrate’s signature subject to GFE

CA11: Officer reasonably mistook dog’s whimper inside for person in distress; entry valid

“The major question presented on appeal is whether it was reasonable for officers, mistaking a dog’s whimper for a person in distress, to enter Evans’s home without a warrant. Given the totality of the circumstances, we say yes.” United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Community caretaking function, Dog sniff, Excessive force, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Officer reasonably mistook dog’s whimper inside for person in distress; entry valid

W.D.Wash.: A filter team is required for execution of an allegedly overbroad SW

A filter team isn’t required just because a Facebook account search warrant is alleged to be overbroad. United States v. Sam, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79023 (W.D. Wash. May 5, 2020). Hearsay in a search warrant isn’t less believable solely … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of pleading, Overbreadth, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: A filter team is required for execution of an allegedly overbroad SW

OH9: Possession of <100g MJ is a nonarrestable offense, so a search incident was unreasonable

Possession of <100g marijuana is a nonarrestable offense, so a search incident was unreasonable. State v. R.L., 2020-Ohio-2811, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 1774 (9th Dist. May 6, 2020). Without a motion to suppress, there’s no vehicle for development of a … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Search incident, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH9: Possession of <100g MJ is a nonarrestable offense, so a search incident was unreasonable

S.D.Ga.: Renting a motel room doesn’t make their parking lot your curtilage

Just because defendant’s girlfriend rented a motel room and he was with her doesn’t make the motel parking lot their curtilage. “[N]ot even a hotel’s owner, to say nothing of its transitory guests, has a reasonable expectation of privacy in … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Renting a motel room doesn’t make their parking lot your curtilage

N.D.Ohio: Private party, here the owner, can be enlisted to help in computer search

Both the Fourth Amendment and Ohio law permitted law enforcement to seek private assistance in executing a search warrant, here of a computer, and the search was conducted by the company that owned the computer. United States v. Powell, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Private party, here the owner, can be enlisted to help in computer search

OH1: Warrantless procedure for police obtaining medical records violates 4A, but GFE applied here

State law provided for a warrantless procedure to obtain medical records for OVI cases. The court finds it violates the Fourth Amendment, but it refuses to apply the exclusionary rule because the officer reasonably relied on state law to access … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH1: Warrantless procedure for police obtaining medical records violates 4A, but GFE applied here

E.D.Mich.: Innocent explanations for pole camera evidence to get SW didn’t make a Franks challenge because there still was PC

Defendant’s innocent explanations for what pole camera videos showed that were not in the affidavit for search warrant do not amount to a Franks challenge. There still was probable cause. United States v. Joye, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66463 (E.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Pole cameras, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Innocent explanations for pole camera evidence to get SW didn’t make a Franks challenge because there still was PC

CA4: State court suppressed SW for lack of nexus, and then feds indicted; GFE applies to the state warrant

Defendant was prosecuted in state court for a drug related murder, and the state court suppressed the search of his house finding lack of nexus. State v. Miller, 2016 S.C. Unpub. LEXIS 28 (Mar. 30, 2016). Defendant was then prosecuted … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on CA4: State court suppressed SW for lack of nexus, and then feds indicted; GFE applies to the state warrant

D.N.J.: There were material misrepresentations in the affidavit for a vehicle SW, but they are mooted by the automobile exception

The validity of the search warrant for defendant’s car was irrelevant where the automobile exception applied. Therefore, defendant’s Franks challenge is moot despite the fact there were material misrepresentations in the affidavit because the officers were trying to keep a … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.N.J.: There were material misrepresentations in the affidavit for a vehicle SW, but they are mooted by the automobile exception

D.R.I.: Threat that def could lose kids to state if she didn’t consent made it involuntary

Consent was not voluntary where the officer told defendant that DCYF might take her kids. Had police sought a search warrant, there was no nexus. “The Court finds that law enforcement could not have shown a sufficient nexus between Almonte’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Threat that def could lose kids to state if she didn’t consent made it involuntary