Author Archives: Hall

Louisville Courier Journal: Was a ‘no-knock’ warrant justified to search Breonna Taylor’s home? Several experts say no

Louisville Courier Journal: Was a ‘no-knock’ warrant justified to search Breonna Taylor’s home? Several experts say no by Andrew Wolfson (“A national authority on search and seizure law says the no-knock warrant that Louisville police obtained for Breonna Taylor’s apartment … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on Louisville Courier Journal: Was a ‘no-knock’ warrant justified to search Breonna Taylor’s home? Several experts say no

CA6: No QI for prosecutors instigating raid without PC

Tennessee prosecutors have no qualified immunity for CBD raids instigated without probable cause in Operation Candy Crush. Even the state indictment they procured without probable cause doesn’t grant them immunity. Rieves v. Town of Smyrna, Tennessee, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: No QI for prosecutors instigating raid without PC

CA5: When an excessive force claim is properly analyzed under the 4A , the 14A is inapplicable

“[W]hen a claim is properly analyzed under the Fourth Amendment, the Fourteenth is inapplicable. Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 395 (1989) (holding that ‘all claims that law enforcement officers have used excessive force-deadly or not-in the course of an … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: When an excessive force claim is properly analyzed under the 4A , the 14A is inapplicable

NE: Indicia linking def to premises searched could be subject of SW; affidavit didn’t need a detailed explanation of CODIS for magistrate

Obtaining defendant’s CSLI in February 2017, 16 months before Carpenter, was in good faith and reasonable. That information could thus be used in an affidavit for search warrant for his house because probable cause was otherwise shown for it. Also, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, DNA, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on NE: Indicia linking def to premises searched could be subject of SW; affidavit didn’t need a detailed explanation of CODIS for magistrate

OR: State didn’t prove abandonment of hotel room by supposedly checking out early

Just because hotel tenants leave the room and carries bags to their car at 8 am and saying nothing doesn’t indicate they have checked out and abandoned the room. Hotel room renters commonly do that and go to meetings and … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: State didn’t prove abandonment of hotel room by supposedly checking out early

OH5: Walking down the middle of the street at night in a high crime area justified a patdown

Walking down the middle of the street at night in a high crime area justified a patdown. State v. Hall, 2020-Ohio-2937, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 1913 (5th Dist. May 15, 2020).* Replica of Glover: State v. Anglin, 2020-Ohio-2907, 2020 Ohio … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH5: Walking down the middle of the street at night in a high crime area justified a patdown

CA3: Driving on suspended DL justifies inventory of car, so search was inevitable

Defendant was driving on a suspended license, and it was inevitable that his car would be towed and inventoried. The search was thus not suppressed. United States v. Bradley, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 15593 (3d Cir. May 15, 2020). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inevitable discovery, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA3: Driving on suspended DL justifies inventory of car, so search was inevitable

OR: Common authority, not ownership, confers actual authority to consent

“It is common authority, not legal ownership, that confers actual authority to consent to a search. … In this case, the evidence was sufficient for the court to find that A shared common authority with defendant over the bedroom and … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on OR: Common authority, not ownership, confers actual authority to consent

MA: Def gets limited discovery into CI’s reliability otherwise not provided by state

Massachusetts court sees no need to intervene yet in a trial court’s limited discovery order for the CI’s reliability which was wanting in the affidavit. “If the Commonwealth feels that any document would reveal the informant’s identity, it can seek … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on MA: Def gets limited discovery into CI’s reliability otherwise not provided by state

MA: Police answering call to seized cell phone was unreasonable without SW

Defendant’s cell phone was seized by the police. A call came in about 74 minutes later, and it was answered. The state could have obtained a search warrant before that and did not, and it didn’t show that it couldn’t. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on MA: Police answering call to seized cell phone was unreasonable without SW

IA: 4A claim not properly made in motion for new trial; denied so it can come via post-conviction proceeding

Fourth Amendment claim made in motion for new trial is denied without prejudice to litigate it in a post-conviction proceeding. State v. Bell, 2020 Iowa App. LEXIS 521 (May 13, 2020). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not pursuing a motion … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on IA: 4A claim not properly made in motion for new trial; denied so it can come via post-conviction proceeding

SC: Def gets to litigate possible Mitchell exceptions on remand

Defendant is entitled to a remand to litigate whether a Mitchell warrantless BAC exception applies. State v. Key, 2020 S.C. LEXIS 71 (May 13, 2020). Defendant’s motion to suppress was properly denied by the good faith exception where obtaining of … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on SC: Def gets to litigate possible Mitchell exceptions on remand

CA11: Shooting passenger in a car used as a weapon unreasonable

Shooting a passenger in a car that was allegedly used as a weapon was unreasonable because the passenger had no control over the car and his shooting wouldn’t stop the car. Robinson v. Rankin, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 15297 (11th … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA11: Shooting passenger in a car used as a weapon unreasonable

LA1: Claim probation violation warrant lacked justification that led to search incident has to be argued on appeal

Defendant claimed his probation violation arrest warrant was defective and then argued the search incident to his arrest was thus invalid. On appeal, he doesn’t argue the validity of the arrest warrant, so the argument is waived. State v. Anglin, … Continue reading →

Posted in Search incident, Standards of review, Warrant execution | Comments Off on LA1: Claim probation violation warrant lacked justification that led to search incident has to be argued on appeal

OH9: When trial court relies on video of stop and search, failure to include in record on appeal is waiver

The trial court relied on the video of the stop and search, but it was not included by the defense in the record on appeal. This is considered waiver. State v. Hays, 2020-Ohio-2919, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 1869 (9th Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH9: When trial court relies on video of stop and search, failure to include in record on appeal is waiver

MN: REP in hotel registry information under state constitution

A hotel customer has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the hotel’s registry information about the customer from government intrusion, at least with reasonable suspicion under the state constitution. The statute permitting inspection is constitutional with this limitation. The officer’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, State constitution | Comments Off on MN: REP in hotel registry information under state constitution

MT: Knock-and-talk led to forced entry based on exigency of officers being made

A Montana DTF was tipped off to defendant bringing a cache of heroin to a motel to distribute. Officers set up surveillance and recognized local drug dealers coming and going. They called for uniformed backup and attempted a knock-and-talk which … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk | Comments Off on MT: Knock-and-talk led to forced entry based on exigency of officers being made

WSJ: Coronavirus Demands a Privacy Law

WSJ: Coronavirus Demands a Privacy Law by Christine Wilson (“Silicon Valley’s role in contact tracing and social-distancing enforcement has Americans worried.”):

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WSJ: Coronavirus Demands a Privacy Law

CA5: 4 questions in 35 seconds at immigration checkpoint were reasonable

Four questions in 35 seconds at an immigration checkpoint were reasonable and for immigration purposes, not general crime control. United States v. Avery, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 15034 (5th Cir. May 11, 2020). A random LPN check showed the owner’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Immigration checkpoints, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: 4 questions in 35 seconds at immigration checkpoint were reasonable

ME: No REP in paperwork kept in prison

Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his prison paperwork under Hudson v. Palmer or state law. If legal mail were involved, plaintiff would have to show actual injury [n.5]. Anctil v. Cassese, 2020 ME 59, 2020 Me. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Prison and jail searches, Warrant execution | Comments Off on ME: No REP in paperwork kept in prison