Author Archives: Hall

New Yorker: How a C.I.A. Coverup Targeted a Whistle-blower [on “intelligence laundering”]

New Yorker: How a C.I.A. Coverup Targeted a Whistle-blower by Ronan Farrow (“When a Justice Department lawyer exposed the agency’s secret role in drug cases, leadership in the intelligence community retaliated.”):

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on New Yorker: How a C.I.A. Coverup Targeted a Whistle-blower [on “intelligence laundering”]

CA2: NY Family Court orders can suffice as SWs

“New York Family Court orders provide an independent basis for police officers to enter peoples’ homes. We have repeatedly recognized that, ‘[i]n child-abuse investigations, a Family Court order is equivalent to a search warrant for Fourth Amendment purposes.’ Southerland v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: NY Family Court orders can suffice as SWs

W.D.Wash.: Single citation of 4A in state court didn’t exhaust state claim

For those attempting to understand habeas, and I’m not sure I’m one: A single citation to the Fourth Amendment in a state brief didn’t qualify as exhaustion of the claim for § 2254(d). Berniard v. Obenland, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Single citation of 4A in state court didn’t exhaust state claim

S.D.N.Y.: Householder had common authority over def’s room to at least enter

A pair of shoes in plain view in defendant’s room in somebody else’s house were validly seized. The householder had sufficient common authority to at least consent to enter the room. It was not defendant’s primary residence. The officer’s reliance … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Householder had common authority over def’s room to at least enter

W.D.Ky.: When there is PC and the automobile exception applies, the 4A doesn’t require a drug dog be used

The officer had probable cause on the totality for a vehicle search under the automobile exception. It wasn’t required that the drug dog that was there be used, too. United States v. Moralez, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206109 (W.D. Ky. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Dog sniff, Knock and talk | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: When there is PC and the automobile exception applies, the 4A doesn’t require a drug dog be used

AZ: CSLI order here in 2014 wasn’t a “warrant” but it complies with GFE

Also in a death penalty case, defendant’s CSLI was obtained by court order four years before Carpenter. The court finds that, while it wouldn’t treat the “order” as the functional equivalent of a search warrant [“reasonable grounds” wasn’t probable cause; … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, State constitution | Comments Off on AZ: CSLI order here in 2014 wasn’t a “warrant” but it complies with GFE

D.Neb.: PC for def’s vehicle leaving the scene of a shooting led to nexus to his house

“As explained, witnesses saw a dark colored vehicle speeding away from the scene of the May 27, 2020 shooting and at least two witnesses believe the vehicle was a Nissan. At the same time, police surveillance puts Defendant’s gray Nissan … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: PC for def’s vehicle leaving the scene of a shooting led to nexus to his house

TX: SW for forensic evidence in def’s truck was particular enough

Defendant was convicted of capital murder in the death of a police officer. He and his vehicle were linked by probable cause to the shooting. The search warrant was sufficiently particular for his truck for forensic evidence of the shooting. … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on TX: SW for forensic evidence in def’s truck was particular enough

MA: SW for CSLI for too much time was severable

The search warrant for too many hours of CSLI was overbroad: “The collection of extended CSLI data raises significant constitutional concerns.” Three hours is all that could be shown was necessary. The overbroad part, however, could be severed, and suppression … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Exclusionary rule, Overbreadth | Comments Off on MA: SW for CSLI for too much time was severable

Jurist: Michigan voters approve warrant requirement for electronic data searches

Jurist: Michigan voters approve warrant requirement for electronic data searches by Daniel Klapper (“Michigan voters Tuesday approved an amendment to the state constitution that will require law enforcement to get a warrant for electronic data searches. The amendment prohibits searches … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Digital privacy | Comments Off on Jurist: Michigan voters approve warrant requirement for electronic data searches

E.D.Pa.: Each factor of RS alone might not be enough but totality was

“While Mr. Muldrow rightly points out the tip, his evasive behavior, and the neighborhood each standing alone, would not create reasonable suspicion, all of these factors together with Sergeant Stephan’s observation Mr. Muldrow appeared to have a gun and hid … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Each factor of RS alone might not be enough but totality was

S.D.Ohio: Not IAC to fail to call co-arrestee at suppression hearing to testify to facts of search

It wasn’t ineffective assistance of counsel for defense counsel to decline to call Smith who was also arrested at the same time to corroborate his version of events of the search. Counsel believed that Smith wouldn’t withstand reasonable cross-examination because … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Not IAC to fail to call co-arrestee at suppression hearing to testify to facts of search

E.D.Tenn.: Leaving suitcase in an open grassy area is a loss of a REP in it

Defendant left his suitcase in an open grassy area, and that was a waiver any reasonable expectation of privacy in it. See United States v. Wilson, 984 F. Supp. 2d 676 (E.D. Ky. 2013) (leaving suitcase in a cemetery was … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Leaving suitcase in an open grassy area is a loss of a REP in it

S.D.Tex.: Def’s fumbling with papers and not knowing owner of the car he was driving and where he was was RS

A flapping paper tag that couldn’t be easily seen was reasonable justification for defendant’s stop. The stop was continued with reasonable suspicion. United States v. Carrizales, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204252 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 2, 2020).* As to reasonable suspicion:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Def’s fumbling with papers and not knowing owner of the car he was driving and where he was was RS

CA6: GPS tracking warrant litigated in state court couldn’t be habeas issue

Defendant’s habeas claim that the application for the GPS tracking warrant was based on false information was barred by Stone v. Powell. Neil v. Forshey, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 34461 (6th Cir. Oct. 30, 2020).* Defendant’s successive habeas petition raises … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA6: GPS tracking warrant litigated in state court couldn’t be habeas issue

WV: SW not needed to seize cell phone from a person, even when it’s expected to be found

The warrantless seizure of defendant’s cell phone was reasonable. The officers didn’t need to get a search warrant before taking it off his person. State v. Deem, 2020 W. Va. LEXIS 706 (Oct. 20, 2020). The officer’s prior knowledge of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WV: SW not needed to seize cell phone from a person, even when it’s expected to be found

E.D.Pa.: When dwelling was found to be multi-unit, the search was limited to the proper one; ER should not be applied because the officer acted in complete good faith

Defendant failed to make a substantial preliminary showing for Franks purposes that the officer recklessly disregarded the fact there could be two residential units in the building he was seeking the search warrant for. He reviewed property records and Google … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: When dwelling was found to be multi-unit, the search was limited to the proper one; ER should not be applied because the officer acted in complete good faith

CA8: If officers “lingered” during protective sweep, nothing else was found as a result

Defendant complained that the officers “lingered” during the protective sweep. Even if they did, nothing else was found as a result. United States v. Crutchfield, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 34446 (8th Cir. Nov. 2, 2020). The driver of the car … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Protective sweep, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA8: If officers “lingered” during protective sweep, nothing else was found as a result

NE: Search of passenger’s purse by consent for passenger compartment was based on reasonable belief it was passenger’s

The driver consented to a search of the car defendant was a passenger in. The passenger’s purse was reasonably believed to be the driver’s for consent purposes, even though it was on her side. When it was opened and her … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on NE: Search of passenger’s purse by consent for passenger compartment was based on reasonable belief it was passenger’s

CA6: Lies told during probation search help form RS

Defendant denied he lived in the house where the police conducted a probation search. His standing was challenged, but the merits were decided. They suspected him of being involved in drug dealing and went to talk to him and his … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA6: Lies told during probation search help form RS