Author Archives: Hall

Cal.4: Drunk in public with a vehicle justifies a vehicle search under the automobile exception

Drunk in public with a vehicle justifies a vehicle search under the automobile exception. People v. Sims, 2021 Cal. App. LEXIS 33 (4th Dist. Jan. 12, 2021). A search warrant that resulted in a search where three buildings were on … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Particularity | Comments Off on Cal.4: Drunk in public with a vehicle justifies a vehicle search under the automobile exception

CNS: LA Police Commission Adopts Oversight Measures for Facial Recognition Tool

CNS: LA Police Commission Adopts Oversight Measures for Facial Recognition Tool by Martin Macias Jr. (“The LAPD’s promise of robust oversight for facial recognition technology in police work hasn’t quelled concerns from civil liberties groups that the tools will perpetuate … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on CNS: LA Police Commission Adopts Oversight Measures for Facial Recognition Tool

E.D.N.Y.: Ptf’s injunction request against future illegal searches speculative

“Even if plaintiff had correctly labeled this claim as a Fourth Amendment one, he could not show that he is entitled to a preliminary injunction. ‘Speculative, remote or future injury’ is not enough to show irreparable harm. Phelan v. Sullivan, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Ptf’s injunction request against future illegal searches speculative

CA8: Creighton U. security officers are private actors

Creighton University security officers are private actors in seizing and searching defendant. They did not act in concert with any law enforcement agency, and they called the police to take defendant away. United States v. Avalos, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Private search | Comments Off on CA8: Creighton U. security officers are private actors

CA8: Direction to stay in car during a traffic stop wasn’t a seizure

Direction to defendant to stay in his car during a stop was not a separate seizure. United States v. Warren, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 701 (8th Cir. Jan. 12, 2021). There was probable cause for defendant’s arrest. Officers bought drugs … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Direction to stay in car during a traffic stop wasn’t a seizure

W.D.N.C.: Def counsel not ineffective for not arguing Carpenter protects bank records because it doesn’t

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in bank records such that the government needed a warrant to get them. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing that there was such an interest. “Carpenter did not overrule Miller but merely … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Def counsel not ineffective for not arguing Carpenter protects bank records because it doesn’t

GA: When there is PC for an arrest, the validity of an arrest warrant is moot

There was probable cause for defendant’s arrest, so the validity of the arrest warrant doesn’t matter. Harper v. State, 2021 Ga. LEXIS 2 (Jan. 11, 2021). Defendant’s claim of lack of probable cause is really just an effort to construe … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Standards of review | Comments Off on GA: When there is PC for an arrest, the validity of an arrest warrant is moot

E.D.Tenn.: Def’s car that others were known to drive being outside house of another wasn’t reasonable belief he was there

Officers did not have a reasonable belief defendant was on the premises of another just because he was seen there a month earlier and what was somewhat believed to be his car was parked out outside just before the entry. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Def’s car that others were known to drive being outside house of another wasn’t reasonable belief he was there

MA: Planning of homicide with co-conspirator was nexus for cell phone SW

It was reasonable for the magistrate to conclude that evidence of defendant’s planning of a homicide would be on his cell phone because he communicated with co-conspirators. Therefore, nexus to the phone was shown. Commonwealth v. Snow, 2021 Mass. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on MA: Planning of homicide with co-conspirator was nexus for cell phone SW

GA: Cell phone believed to be on def’s person at time of robbery and murder is subject for SW for evidence of the crimes

The affidavit for the warrant showed probable cause and particularity for search of defendant’s cell phone for evidence of an armed robbery and murder [essentially on the officer’s experience]. The trial court suppressed a pre-warrant search of defendant’s cell phone, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Particularity | Comments Off on GA: Cell phone believed to be on def’s person at time of robbery and murder is subject for SW for evidence of the crimes

NE: State failed in its burden of proof on inventory; the defense has no duty to clear up confusion in the proof

The state carried the burden, and it failed to prove that the inventory of defendant’s vehicle followed standardized procedure or was reasonable. The defense had no burden to clear up any evidentiary confusion because the state had the burden. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Inventory, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on NE: State failed in its burden of proof on inventory; the defense has no duty to clear up confusion in the proof

AZ: Third party doctrine after Carpenter doesn’t require SW for IP addresses and subscriber info

The third party doctrine after Carpenter does not make IP addresses and subscriber information protected by the Fourth Amendment or the state constitution. State v. Mixon, 2021 Ariz. LEXIS 3 (Jan. 11, 2021):

Posted in Digital privacy, State constitution, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on AZ: Third party doctrine after Carpenter doesn’t require SW for IP addresses and subscriber info

KY: Smell of burning marijuana from a house alone is not exigency

The entry here could not be justified as a protective sweep because of a lack of reason to believe the person sought was there. It also can’t be justified by exigency because of the smell of burning marijuana alone. Nothing … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on KY: Smell of burning marijuana from a house alone is not exigency

E.D.Cal.: 8A applies to excessive force claims in prison

The Eighth Amendment applies to excessive force claims in prison; the Fourth Amendment to free worlders. Rodriguez v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4100 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2021). The court believes the officer over the defendant on whether … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: 8A applies to excessive force claims in prison

NY: Tenants can consent to a rental property inspection

In a rental property inspection, the tenants consented, and that was constitutionally sufficient. Town of Huntington v. CFLNYNY, LLC, 2021 NY Slip Op 50009(U), 2021 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 27 (Suffolk Co. Jan. 7, 2021).* There was probable cause for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY: Tenants can consent to a rental property inspection

E.D.Tenn.: Address wasn’t required where picture of property was in SW

Defendant’s address wasn’t included in the affidavit for the search warrant, but its picture was and there was no mistake on the place searched. That was sufficient. United States v. Lingo, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3861 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 8, … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Address wasn’t required where picture of property was in SW

D.Del.: Videotaping an otherwise valid prison strip search isn’t a per se 4A violation

“Plaintiff does not allege that the search itself violated his rights but, rather, it is the recording of the search that he finds objectionable.” “[U]sing a camera to record a strip search in a prison does not, by itself, amount … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search | Comments Off on D.Del.: Videotaping an otherwise valid prison strip search isn’t a per se 4A violation

CA10: Ptf’s conviction barred his 1983 claim because it established facts against him under Heck

“Mr. Birch’s convictions preclude him from establishing a genuine issue of material fact as to his Fourth Amendment excessive force claims against Officers Sinclair, Page, and Stout, Fourteenth Amendment malicious prosecution claims, and Fourth Amendment false arrest claims. In dismissing … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA10: Ptf’s conviction barred his 1983 claim because it established facts against him under Heck

D.Colo.: Failure to call the officers with enough information to show collective knowledge as witnesses made govt fail in its burden of proof

The government failed to prove collective knowledge at the hearing on the motion to suppress. A critical witness to collective knowledge wasn’t called. United States v. De La Rosa-Calderon, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3378 (D. Colo. Jan. 7, 2021):

Posted in Burden of proof, Collective knowledge | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Failure to call the officers with enough information to show collective knowledge as witnesses made govt fail in its burden of proof

CA6: 4A 1983 claim brought after state court reversal on search claim was untimely

Plaintiff’s 1983 unreasonable search claim is untimely. He brought the claim after his state appeal reversed his conviction on a bad search. “Dibrell’s claim is untimely under these rules. His detention ended on February 18, 2014, when he was released … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Search | Comments Off on CA6: 4A 1983 claim brought after state court reversal on search claim was untimely