Author Archives: Hall

KY: Trial court has no duty to suppress without defense objection

The trial court has no duty to sua sponte suppress when the defense makes no objection. It also isn’t plain error. Gardner v. Commonwealth, 2021 Ky. App. LEXIS 23 (Mar. 12, 2021) (unpublished):

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on KY: Trial court has no duty to suppress without defense objection

M.D.Tenn.: Def failed to show parole search was unreasonble

This parole search wasn’t shown to be unreasonable. “As discussed in the above cited case law, there is a significant government interest in combating recidivism and thwarting illegal drug activity by parolees. Defendant has failed to point to any direct … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Probation / Parole search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Def failed to show parole search was unreasonble

D.Idaho: Traffic stop was admitted pretextual but it was based on RS of a drug offense and otherwise objectively reasonable

Defendant’s traffic stop was admittedly pretextual to investigate a drug offense, and the officers had reasonable suspicion on collective knowledge to justify the stop. United States v. Tuschoff, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47130 (D. Idaho Mar. 10, 2021). The CI … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Traffic stop was admitted pretextual but it was based on RS of a drug offense and otherwise objectively reasonable

Bloomberg Law: Surveillance Camera Hack Raises Legal Risk of Digital Device Use

Bloomberg Law: Surveillance Camera Hack Raises Legal Risk of Digital Device Use by Andrea Vittorio & Jake Holland (“A recent hack into a massive collection of security camera data from Verkada Inc. shows the cyber and privacy-related vulnerabilities of digital … Continue reading →

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on Bloomberg Law: Surveillance Camera Hack Raises Legal Risk of Digital Device Use

M.D.La.: Anonymous 911 call was corroborated enough for Navarette

The anonymous 911 call about flashing a gun at children satisfied Navarette. The officer was a mile from the place mentioned in the report and arrived shortly thereafter and saw the person the call reported. While the 911 caller could … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Anonymous 911 call was corroborated enough for Navarette

N.D.Okla.: Failure to pay arrest warrant doesn’t violate 4A

A failure to pay arrest warrant issued on probable cause doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment because that’s only to start the process, not end it. Graff v. Aberdeen II, Inc., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46760 (N.D. Okla. Mar. 12, 2021):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Failure to pay arrest warrant doesn’t violate 4A

OH7: Search incident proper after concealed weapon found on def

Defendant was searched and arrested for a concealed weapon. That did not prohibit the officers from further searching his personal effects in his clothes. State v. Zepernick, 2021-Ohio-719, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 724 (7th Dist. Mar. 4, 2021). 2254 petitioner’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH7: Search incident proper after concealed weapon found on def

N.D.Ohio: Franks challenge succeeds: no PC of trafficking, stale, and no GFE

Defendant prevails in his Franks challenge. The police withheld that defendant was at worst a suspect in personal use of marijuana, but made it look like he was a trafficker when they had no evidence of it. That means that … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Franks challenge succeeds: no PC of trafficking, stale, and no GFE

OR: Entry onto curtilage to closely examine car for evidence of hit-and-run exceed implied consent of entry

After a hit-and-run accident, police took a bumper part left at the scene. They ultimately located the probable car at defendant’s house. The police, as any other visitor, had implied authority to enter the curtilage but not to look at … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Curtilage, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OR: Entry onto curtilage to closely examine car for evidence of hit-and-run exceed implied consent of entry

M.D.Ala.: Some force inheres in any arrest; de minimus force is reasonable

Some amount of force occurs in any arrest. The question is unreasonableness. “Garrett’s conclusory allegation regarding Williams’s specific actions establishes no more than the use of de minimis force by Williams, which does not constitute a Fourth Amendment violation.” Garrett … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Some force inheres in any arrest; de minimus force is reasonable

CA6: Def doesn’t show arrest was delayed to facilitate better protective sweep

The protective sweep finding defendant’s guns on execution of his arrest warrant was reasonable. Defendant does not show that the officers intentionally delayed his arrest with the purpose of exploiting a protective sweep. United States v. Cammon, 2021 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA6: Def doesn’t show arrest was delayed to facilitate better protective sweep

NE: Police have no const’l duty to fully interrogate a citizen informant

A citizen informant told police of a motorist that might need assistance, and that led to defendant’s arrest. There is no constitutional requirement for police to interrogate the citizen informant. State v. Montoya, 29 Neb. App. 563, 2021 Neb. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Knock and talk | Comments Off on NE: Police have no const’l duty to fully interrogate a citizen informant

CA7: Claim of lack of PC for arrest not insulated from later review by a judicial finding of PC for trial

Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment claim they were arrested without probable cause survives the state trial court finding enough to hold them for trial. “The Supreme Court held that a Fourth Amendment theory based on lack of probable cause survives a judicial … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Claim of lack of PC for arrest not insulated from later review by a judicial finding of PC for trial

GA: 4A claim had to be raised at agency hearing level to preserve for appeal

Failure to object on Fourth Amendment grounds at the agency level before the zoning board in a zoning administrative case was waiver for appeal. Forsyth County v. Mommies Props. LLC, 2021 Ga. App. LEXIS 145 (Mar. 11, 2021). “The first … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on GA: 4A claim had to be raised at agency hearing level to preserve for appeal

FL1: Sheriff’s Office failed to show TV and PlayStation were lawfully seized during drug search

The Bay County SO executed a drug search warrant at claimant’s father’s house and seized a flat screen TV and PlayStation. Claimant sought return, and the state claimed it was lawfully taken and became county property by operation of law. … Continue reading →

Posted in Overseizure, Reasonableness, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on FL1: Sheriff’s Office failed to show TV and PlayStation were lawfully seized during drug search

W.D.Mo.: Govt moots motion to suppress by deciding not to use challenged evidence

When the defendant files a motion to suppress and the government elects not to use the evidence at trial, the motion becomes moot. United States v. Bowers, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45445 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 11, 2021). Defendant’s 2255 for … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Govt moots motion to suppress by deciding not to use challenged evidence

TX13: State showed exigency for BAC without SW because it would have taken one of two officers off-duty

The state showed exigency in not getting a search warrant for defendant’s BAC after a serious car crash left him unconscious. It would have taken hours to get the warrant back then [2013] and it would have taken one of … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TX13: State showed exigency for BAC without SW because it would have taken one of two officers off-duty

C.D.Ill.: Prison strip searches are always permitted, unless done unreasonably

Inmates seen naked in prison is not a constitutional claim unless it was all done in an unreasonable manner. The limited facts here fail to show that. Danuk v. Downey, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45383 (C.D. Ill. Mar. 11, 2021):

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness, Strip search | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Prison strip searches are always permitted, unless done unreasonably

E.D.Pa.: Just because defense counsel finds an omitted fact interesting doesn’t make it “material”; not all facts need be included

The 121 page affidavit for search warrant for evidence of drug trafficking was neither stale nor lacked nexus. Defendant’s Franks challenge also fails for lack of a substantial preliminary showing. United States v. Briggs, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44653 (E.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Just because defense counsel finds an omitted fact interesting doesn’t make it “material”; not all facts need be included

CA11: Encounter was consensual; race of occupants of car never a valid concern

The court finds that the police-citizen encounter here was consensual, so the question of reasonable suspicion doesn’t have to be decided. The race of the occupants is never a concern in consent. United States v. Knights, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Encounter was consensual; race of occupants of car never a valid concern