Author Archives: Hall

MD: Tracking “court order” didn’t need to be called a “warrant” to be one

A “court order” for tracking defendant’s vehicle satisfied the warrant requirement, and it didn’t have to be called a search warrant. It was issued with probable cause, and the good faith exception applied. Whittington v. State, 2021 Md. LEXIS 255 … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on MD: Tracking “court order” didn’t need to be called a “warrant” to be one

E.D.Mich.: Even with redactions, SW affidavit shows PC

Redacted search warrant application showed probable cause even with redactions. United States v. Rivers, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104195 (E.D. Mich. June 3, 2021). The officer had called for a tow truck for defendant’s car and an inventory was inevitable, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inevitable discovery, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Even with redactions, SW affidavit shows PC

CA6: SW affidavit can suggest CI’s lack of credibility, but here it was overcome

It is possible for a search warrant affidavit to suggest the lack of credibility of the CI, but, here, the CI’s credibility was corroborated by other facts and her willingness to be identified. United States v. Woods, 2021 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA6: SW affidavit can suggest CI’s lack of credibility, but here it was overcome

WV: Exclusionary rule would not be applied in administrative child abuse proceeding for protection of children

The exclusionary rule does not apply to child abuse allegations in administrative proceedings. The court declines the request to apply it despite the rule that it doesn’t apply in civil cases generally because of harm to the children. In re … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on WV: Exclusionary rule would not be applied in administrative child abuse proceeding for protection of children

CA7: Omission of CI’s criminal history was “unfortunate” but not material for Franks

“[W]e agree with the district court that the ‘omission of information about the sources’ backgrounds, criminal histories, or motives does not change the probable cause determination.’ See also United States v. Sims, 551 F.3d 640, 645 (7th Cir. 2008) (omission … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA7: Omission of CI’s criminal history was “unfortunate” but not material for Franks

IN: Plain view applied to vehicle seizure in driveway

Plain view justified the seizure of defendant’s van in his driveway, even assuming it was on the curtilage. It was immediately apparent to the officers it was criminal evidence. Combs v. State, 2021 Ind. LEXIS 358 (June 3. 2021). n.5:

Posted in Curtilage, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IN: Plain view applied to vehicle seizure in driveway

NY1: Cross-examination about potential suspects let go from scene of search opened door to suppressed statement

Defendant’s cross-examination about others not ultimately charged after the search opened the door to his suppressed statement. “First, defendant elicited that although the police arrested him and the other two persons who were in his apartment at the time a … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on NY1: Cross-examination about potential suspects let go from scene of search opened door to suppressed statement

CA3: Ghostwritten SW affidavit not a Franks violation because there was indisputably PC

A police officer’s admission at trial that the affidavit for search warrant was ghostwritten for him didn’t show a Franks violation because there clearly was probable cause. United States v. Ware, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16568 (3d Cir. June 3, … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Ghostwritten SW affidavit not a Franks violation because there was indisputably PC

N.D.Ohio: DMV’s computer mistake def’s DL was suspended doesn’t invoke the exclusionary rule under Evans

DMV’s computer mistake defendant’s DL was suspended doesn’t invoke the exclusionary rule under Evans. United States v. Salazar, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103027 (N.D. Ohio June 2, 2021). Defendant’s “regenerating” activity in selling heroin made the warrant application not stale. … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Exclusionary rule, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: DMV’s computer mistake def’s DL was suspended doesn’t invoke the exclusionary rule under Evans

HPM: Former Houston Police Officer Pleads Guilty To Falsifying Records In Harding Street Raid Case

Houston Public Media: Former Houston Police Officer Pleads Guilty To Falsifying Records In Harding Street Raid Case by Lucio Vasquez (“Steven Bryant is the first officer to be convicted in the wake of the raid.”)

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on HPM: Former Houston Police Officer Pleads Guilty To Falsifying Records In Harding Street Raid Case

CA4: Trash out for collection at the curb is not on the curtilage

Trash out for collection at the curb is not on the curtilage. United States v. Holmes, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16418 (4th Cir. June 2, 2021). The affidavit for a tracking warrant was misleading in one respect, but it wasn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Inventory, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA4: Trash out for collection at the curb is not on the curtilage

WaPo: If facial recognition is not regulated now, it will never be used responsibly

WaPo: If facial recognition is not regulated now, it will never be used responsibly (“Facial recognition software is full of peril, but it’s also full of potential. with the powerful technology still in its infancy and regulation next to nonexistent, … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: If facial recognition is not regulated now, it will never be used responsibly

SCOTUS: Tribal officers can stop and detain non-Indians on tribal lands

Tribal police have the inherent authority to stop and search non-Indians on tribal lands for potential violations of tribal, state, or federal law. United States v. Cooley, 2021 U.S. LEXIS 2816 (June 1, 2021). The syllabus:

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Tribal officers can stop and detain non-Indians on tribal lands

E.D.Mo.: Sexual assault allegation by school official states 4A claim

Allegation of a sexual assault by a school official states a Fourth Amendment claim. Hermann v. Kirkwood R-7 Sch. Dist., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102574 (E.D. Mo. June 1, 2021). Officers with a search warrant for electronic devices could look … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Scope of search, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Sexual assault allegation by school official states 4A claim

DE: Agency investigative SDT akin to GJ’s

An agency investigative subpoena duces tecum is akin to a grand jury’s, following Morton Salt and Powell. State Dept. of Finance v. AT&T Inc., 2021 Del. LEXIS 178 (June 1, 2021):

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on DE: Agency investigative SDT akin to GJ’s

CA9: Suspicionless search of unconscious person in hospital bed violated clearly established law

“Thus, under binding precedent from this court and the Supreme Court, any reasonable officer would have known that Defendants’ suspicionless and warrantless search of Katzenjammer’s body, while she lay unconscious in a hospital bed, violated the Fourth Amendment.” Young v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA9: Suspicionless search of unconscious person in hospital bed violated clearly established law

CA8: Visitor’s property could be searched under warrant for host’s place on RS they were involved in drugs, too

Defendant was a visitor at a friend’s house when the house was searched under a warrant for drugs. She was on the couch with a meth pipe next to her, so it was reasonable to search her lockbox under the … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: Visitor’s property could be searched under warrant for host’s place on RS they were involved in drugs, too

MA: No REP in a sent text message

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a text message sent to another cell phone. Commonwealth v. Delgado-Rivera, 2021 Mass. LEXIS 341 (June 1, 2021):

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MA: No REP in a sent text message

D.Md.: State’s DoIT owns and controls state computers and can enter computers and offices for access; no REP in state computer

The State of Maryland’s Department of Information Technology owns and controls the computers on its network and has the authority to enter offices to enter computers. Here, child pornography was found. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Md.: State’s DoIT owns and controls state computers and can enter computers and offices for access; no REP in state computer

CA6: Detention with handcuffing on RS permitted putting def in police car

There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s detention, including putting him in a police car while they sorted it out. That was not yet an arrest. United States v. Rogers, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16160 (6th Cir. May 27, 2021). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA6: Detention with handcuffing on RS permitted putting def in police car