Author Archives: Hall

E.D.Tex.: Govt failed to prove traffic offenses or any RS for stop

There was no justification for defendant’s traffic stop based on two statutes that weren’t violated. The government’s assertion of reasonable suspicion from an anonymous tip also failed. United States v. Salazar, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234747 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 12, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Govt failed to prove traffic offenses or any RS for stop

Intelligencer: Amazon’s New Car Cam Takes Personal Surveillance on the Road

Intelligencer: Amazon’s New Car Cam Takes Personal Surveillance on the Road by John Hermann (“Amazon on Thursday opened preorders for a long-awaited addition to its vast catalogue of Ring personal surveillance devices: the Car Cam. Starting at $200, the car … Continue reading →

Posted in Video surveillance | Comments Off on Intelligencer: Amazon’s New Car Cam Takes Personal Surveillance on the Road

CA6: Plastic bag on car console wasn’t obviously “dope” to justify automobile exception

The government argued that the search of defendant’s car was justified by the automobile exception because contraband was in plain view. The court disagrees. There was a plastic bag on the console, and the photographic evidence from inside the car … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA6: Plastic bag on car console wasn’t obviously “dope” to justify automobile exception

S.D.Cal.: Databases checked by probation officers showed def was still on probation before probation search; GFE applies

Defendant claimed his probation search was unreasonable because he was off probation when the search occurred. All the evidence, however, shows that the officers acted in good faith because they checked databases, and it all showed he was still on … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Databases checked by probation officers showed def was still on probation before probation search; GFE applies

SC Const. search and seizure and privacy provision protects abortion rights; Idaho says theirs doesn’t

The state 1971 constitutional amendment recognizing a right to privacy was really enacting what the people always believed about privacy. It provides: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Prison and jail searches, State constitution, Strip search | Comments Off on SC Const. search and seizure and privacy provision protects abortion rights; Idaho says theirs doesn’t

CA10: Traffic stop to flirt with motorist was unreasonable, and clearly established that cause needed

The officer’s stop of plaintiff to flirt with her was without basis and thus unreasonable, and clearly established. Shepherd v. Robbins, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 36056 (10th Cir. Dec. 13, 2022) [corrected Dec. 28, 2022]. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Traffic stop to flirt with motorist was unreasonable, and clearly established that cause needed

D.Minn.: Issuance of an arrest warrant can justify a tracking warrant for suspect

“The Court agrees with essential premise of the R&R: that probable cause existed for the tracking warrant because there was probable cause for the arrest warrant. First, Mr. Ellerman cites no authority for the idea that using a judicially approved … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Issuance of an arrest warrant can justify a tracking warrant for suspect

N.D.Ill.: City’s destruction of street cam video was not shown to be in bad faith

Defendant’s motion to dismiss for a discovery violation in not timely processing a subpoena for a street corner camera that allegedly would show that defendant’s turn signal was on and the stop was wrong is denied. The city didn’t timely … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: City’s destruction of street cam video was not shown to be in bad faith

CA8: PC parolee home is required for a parole search

Probable cause, not reasonable suspicion, is required for belief the parolee is at his residence for a parole search. Surveys conflicting authorities, even from the same district court. United States v. Thabit, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 169 (8th Cir. Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: PC parolee home is required for a parole search

techdirt: Government Continues To Rely On Private Contractors To Bypass Privacy Protections

techdirt: Government Continues To Rely On Private Contractors To Bypass Privacy Protections by Tim Cushing (“There’s only so much domestic surveillance the government can engage in before it starts running into problems. The Supreme Court’s Carpenter decision strongly suggested gathering … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on techdirt: Government Continues To Rely On Private Contractors To Bypass Privacy Protections

D.Mass.: No REP in video surveillance in an apartment building hallway that covered def’s door

“Defendants may have held a subjective expectation that activity in and around the doorway of the apartment would remain private but such an expectation was not objectively reasonable because their activity took place in a common area exposed to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Video surveillance | Comments Off on D.Mass.: No REP in video surveillance in an apartment building hallway that covered def’s door

GA: Generalizations and experience do not support no-knock warrant

The no-knock provision in this search warrant was not based on a showing of necessity based on this case. It was based on experience and generalities. [In addition, defendant was supposedly standing in the front yard, so what about the … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on GA: Generalizations and experience do not support no-knock warrant

FL4: Collective knowledge doctrine with anonymous or confidential sources requires passing details on to fellow officer

When the collective knowledge rule applies to information from an anonymous or confidential source, the officer using the information has to have actual knowledge of the factors supporting its reliability. Zarcadoolas v. Tony, 2023 Fla. App. LEXIS 26 n.3 (Fla. … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Consent, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on FL4: Collective knowledge doctrine with anonymous or confidential sources requires passing details on to fellow officer

FL4: Suppression of arrest exceeded the relief def sought and is reversed

Defendant’s motion to suppress did not put the state on notice that he was seeking to suppress the result of his arrest. The trial court erred in granting that relief. State v. Bender, 2023 Fla. App. LEXIS 27 (Fla. 4th … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading | Comments Off on FL4: Suppression of arrest exceeded the relief def sought and is reversed

Did a Tesla rat out its owner?

LATimes: Driver of Tesla that plunged off Northern California cliff arrested; CHP calls crash intentional After examining evidence, investigators “developed probable cause to believe this incident was an intentional act,” and placed Patel under arrest, according to the CHP. Authorities … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Did a Tesla rat out its owner?

techdirt: Successful Evidence Suppression Motion Shows Cops Think Pretty Much Everything Is ‘Suspicious’

techdirt: Successful Evidence Suppression Motion Shows Cops Think Pretty Much Everything Is ‘Suspicious’ by Tim Cushing, about reasonable suspicion in traffic stops. Everything and anything is reasonable suspicion, so if everything is, everyone can be stopped and detained.

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on techdirt: Successful Evidence Suppression Motion Shows Cops Think Pretty Much Everything Is ‘Suspicious’

D.Minn.: Placing GPS on vehicle 2.5 hours before SW issued didn’t require suppression

“This Court concludes that the supporting affidavit for the GPS tracking warrant establishes probable cause.” “Here, it is undisputed that when the GPS tracking device was placed on the gold Chevy Tahoe at approximately 5:00 p.m. on March 3, 2022, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, DNA, GPS / Tracking Data, Independent source, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Placing GPS on vehicle 2.5 hours before SW issued didn’t require suppression

D.Minn.: Involuntary civil detainees in a sex offender program have no REP in their rooms

Involuntary civil detainees in a sex offender program have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their rooms. White v. Dayton, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71 (D. Minn. Jan. 3, 2023). Habeas petitioner’s claim that a bad photo ID led to … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Involuntary civil detainees in a sex offender program have no REP in their rooms

Reason: Writing a Crim Pro Casebook: How Do You Cover the “Search” Question?

Reason: Writing a Crim Pro Casebook: How Do You Cover the “Search” Question? A reflection on re-writing a chapter of Kamisar LaFave & Israel by Orin Kerr:

Posted in Search | Comments Off on Reason: Writing a Crim Pro Casebook: How Do You Cover the “Search” Question?

W.D.Okla.: Validity of a stop doesn’t depend on whether a traffic offense actually happened, just whether there is RS it did

“[T]he constitutionality of the stop does not depend on whether the driver did, in fact, commit a traffic violation. The standard is reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. If an officer reasonably thinks he saw a driver commit a traffic infraction, then … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Validity of a stop doesn’t depend on whether a traffic offense actually happened, just whether there is RS it did