Author Archives: Hall

AR: Suicide note and no answer at door justified exigent entry

Police responded to a call within minutes of a finding of a suicide note. “One officer called the on-call investigator after knocking on the door and getting no response. It was only then that the officers decided to breach the … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception | Comments Off on AR: Suicide note and no answer at door justified exigent entry

D.Nev.: GFE does not save GPS tracking of additional driver of vehicle

Rubin, a regular driver of defendant’s pickup had standing to challenge a tracking warrant put on it. The issuing judge, however, appears only to have authorized the tracking of Morgan’s use. The court declines to apply the good faith exception. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Immigration checkpoints, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Nev.: GFE does not save GPS tracking of additional driver of vehicle

NACDL: 4 articles on electronic searches

Clare Harvie, What Defense Counsel Should Know About Facial Recognition Technology, 47 Champion 16 (No. 3, May 2023) Jennifer S. Granick, Marking Warrants Great Again: Avoiding General Searches in the Execution of Warrants for Electronic Data, 47 Champion 28 (No. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NACDL: 4 articles on electronic searches

NC: Arrest warrant for def permitted entry into house when he retreated inside; protective sweep valid

Officers had an arrest warrant for defendant for a violent crime, and he was found at home. They saw him outside, and he retreated inside. The SRT showed up too. The entry for the arrest was valid, as was the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on NC: Arrest warrant for def permitted entry into house when he retreated inside; protective sweep valid

CA8: Omission of fact CI lied about prior murder for hire schemes wasn’t material enough where one recorded ptf

This was a murder for hire scheme. The affiant had good information that the CI was a notorious liar, having falsely alleged other schemes in the past. Here, however, there was “powerful” evidence of probable cause in recordings to back … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Omission of fact CI lied about prior murder for hire schemes wasn’t material enough where one recorded ptf

CA9: SOL on search claim starts with the search

Case over search dismissed on SOL grounds. Plaintiff on notice from the time of the search. Reyes v. Cty. of Wash., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9353 (9th Cir. Apr. 19, 2023). The officers obtaining and executing the warrant for defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Overseizure, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: SOL on search claim starts with the search

D.Minn.: The affidavit for SW was somewhat conclusory, but the officer’s efforts to corrorobate the CI showed GF

Officers had probable cause for a Facebook tracking warrant to provide information of where he was when he posted about his travels south to acquire fentanyl for sale in Minnesota based on informant hearsay and his two pending drug cases. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Minn.: The affidavit for SW was somewhat conclusory, but the officer’s efforts to corrorobate the CI showed GF

CA7: Renting a condo under an assumed name to avoid arrest doesn’t show no REP; landlord could not consent

Defendant rented a condo in Atlanta, deceiving the landlord by using an assumed name. The landlord consented to a search. The landlord had no power to consent to a search. People rent hotel rooms and apartments and even buy houses … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Staleness | Comments Off on CA7: Renting a condo under an assumed name to avoid arrest doesn’t show no REP; landlord could not consent

D.S.C.: Younger doctrine precludes habeas action against pending state criminal case, here over the search

Petitioner’s 2241 habeas action against an ongoing state prosecution challenging the search is barred by Younger. Johnson v. Warden Marlboro Cty. Det. Ctr., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67605 (D.S.C. Apr. 17, 2023). Defendant’s girlfriend accidentally saw child pornography on defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Younger doctrine precludes habeas action against pending state criminal case, here over the search

E.D.Wis.: “Whistleblower” is still a CI whose story must be corroborated

A business fraud “whistleblower”’s statement was too conclusory to show probable cause. Franks hearing granted. United States v. Schampers, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68205 (E.D. Wis. Apr. 19, 2023). Defendant was driving back and forth between Plattsburgh NY and Burlington … Continue reading →

Posted in General warrant, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: “Whistleblower” is still a CI whose story must be corroborated

Reason: What Would An Originalist Fourth Amendment Require?

Reason: What Would An Originalist Fourth Amendment Require? by Orin S. Kerr

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Reason: What Would An Originalist Fourth Amendment Require?

CA4: “[T]he ability to execute a search does not necessarily imply power to execute a search warrant.”

“[T]he ability to execute a search does not necessarily imply power to execute a search warrant.” Osmon v. United States, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9177 (4th Cir. Apr. 18, 2023). Defendant’s Franks motion fails because there’s no offer of proof … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: “[T]he ability to execute a search does not necessarily imply power to execute a search warrant.”

E.D.N.Y.: What’s the burden under 18 U.S.C. § 1345 v. SW issuance? Preponderance or PC?

This is a patent action involving an AR-15 trigger mechanism that can convert the gun to a machine gun. The government got involved to enjoin it. The defendants seek a transfer to W.D.Tex. which is denied. The court addresses 18 … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: What’s the burden under 18 U.S.C. § 1345 v. SW issuance? Preponderance or PC?

D.Haw.: Covid quarantines were not 4A seizures

Hawai’i’s Covid quarantines were not Fourth Amendment seizures to aid government intrusions. For Our Rights v. Ige, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66956 (D. Haw. Apr. 17, 2023). Exigent circumstances for warrantless police action is based on an objective standard. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Haw.: Covid quarantines were not 4A seizures

CA9: Mere typo in SW affidavit doesn’t support Franks challenge

Defendant’s Franks challenge was conclusory and based on mere typographical errors. United States v. Howard, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9069 (9th Cir. Apr. 17, 2023). Habeas petitioner’s admission of procedural default of his Fourth Amendment claim was an admission there … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA9: Mere typo in SW affidavit doesn’t support Franks challenge

CA4: CI’s 911 call showing stress of a startling event was reliable

A CI’s 911 call “‘under the stress of excitement caused by a startling event’ (making the call less likely to be preplanned),” was reliable enough for reasonable suspicion. Torres v. Ball, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9076 (4th Cir. Apr. 17, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Independent source, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA4: CI’s 911 call showing stress of a startling event was reliable

PA: SW for flashlight app data on cell phone sustained

The affidavits for search warrant for this cell phone were overbroad as to what was sought lacking probable cause except for location data and use of the flashlight function. Defendant was accused of using the flashlight on his cell phone … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Excessive force, Overbreadth | Comments Off on PA: SW for flashlight app data on cell phone sustained

C.D.Cal.: Mere seizure of a firearm not per se a 2A violation

“‘The mere occurrence of a firearm seizure during a traffic stop, however, is not enough to establish a Second Amendment violation. Police seize and confiscate firearms routinely, and this Court will not presume that each and every one of those … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Mere seizure of a firearm not per se a 2A violation

D.P.R.: Mere presence of FBI at USPO search didn’t make PO ‘stalking horse’

Mere presence of FBI and other law enforcement officers at USPO’s search based on reasonable suspicion did not make the PO a “stalking horse” for the police. United States v. Borges-Sánchez, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66017 (D.P.R. Apr. 14, 2023). … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Nexus, Probation / Parole search, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Mere presence of FBI at USPO search didn’t make PO ‘stalking horse’

CA4: Slightly outdated information police gathered def lived at place in SW still made it in good faith

Officers gathered information that defendant’s son lived in his house and presented it for a search warrant. After the search they found out he didn’t. The warrant was still issued in good faith. United States v. Jordan, 2023 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on CA4: Slightly outdated information police gathered def lived at place in SW still made it in good faith