Author Archives: Hall

CA11: Without a factual dispute, there’s no requirement of a suppression hearing

The suppression “hearing” was a five-minute discussion of the law, and there were no factual disputes presented. Therefore, “defendant need not be present for any ‘conference or hearing on a question of law.’ Fed. R. Crim. P. 43(b)(3).” United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA11: Without a factual dispute, there’s no requirement of a suppression hearing

CA6: Younger requires the federal case over an arrest or search be stayed, not dismissed

The district court improperly dismissed plaintiff’s case under Younger because of ongoing state proceedings it implicated. It should have stayed it instead. Neal El v. Showman, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 12604 (6th Cir. May 22, 2023). The Fourth Amendment does … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Motion to suppress, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: Younger requires the federal case over an arrest or search be stayed, not dismissed

CA8: SW issuing judge not “neutral and detached” just because he didn’t ask questions

A search warrant in Killeen, Texas was issued to look for evidence of a Hobbs Act murder in Lincoln, Nebraska. The affidavit combined information from Texas and Nebraska. There was potential confusion as to whose information was whose but it … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on CA8: SW issuing judge not “neutral and detached” just because he didn’t ask questions

Techdirt: Judge Tosses Evidence After Government Took More Than Three Years To Crack A Suspect’s Phone

Techdirt: Judge Tosses Evidence After Government Took More Than Three Years To Crack A Suspect’s Phone by Tim Cushing (“A robbery/kidnapping case allegedly implicating business owner and immigrant Evgeni Kopankov has resulted in the government losing the evidence it took … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Techdirt: Judge Tosses Evidence After Government Took More Than Three Years To Crack A Suspect’s Phone

CA6: Misstatements in arrest warrant affidavit didn’t prejudice ptr or prevent state trial

In this 2254, without citing Stone v. Powell, the court holds on the merits of the Fourth Amendment claim that misstatements in the arrest warrant affidavit did not prejudice the petitioner because it would not have prevented the trial. Harris … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Misstatements in arrest warrant affidavit didn’t prejudice ptr or prevent state trial

CA6: Officer firing gun at a person he or she doesn’t know fired one, too, is excessive

Officers fired at plaintiff without knowing whether he was the one who fired a gun at them. The sound of racking a bullet into a gun’s chamber in the abstract was not enough. LeFtwich v. Driscoll, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Officer firing gun at a person he or she doesn’t know fired one, too, is excessive

W.D.Pa.: Lack of a proper chain of custody is not a ground for a motion to suppress

Alleged lack of a proper chain of custody is not a ground for a motion to suppress. United States v. Pollard, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88536 (W.D. Pa. May 19, 2023). Defendant’s Fourth Amendment issues on appeal are not the … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Motion to suppress, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Lack of a proper chain of custody is not a ground for a motion to suppress

OH3: Invalid admin SW was saved by GFE

An administrative search warrant issued under the state criminal procedure law was invalid because of limits on who could request and serve a warrant (i.e., law enforcement officers and prosecutors). However, the good faith exception applies to administrative warrants, too. … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH3: Invalid admin SW was saved by GFE

CA5: Officer gets QI for shooting into a car under these circumstances

In a case of shooting into a car, “In sum, plaintiffs have not pointed to sufficient authority clearly establishing that Coborn’s conduct violated the law under the specific circumstances he was facing, and thus he is entitled to qualified immunity.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: Officer gets QI for shooting into a car under these circumstances

CA7: Home confinement sentence included a valid search waiver

Defendant was serving a home confinement sentence that included a search waiver. Officers developed reasonable suspicion of another crime and a violation of living conditions. The search was reasonable. United States v. Beechler, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 12312 (7th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Home confinement sentence included a valid search waiver

LA5: SW improperly suppressed without applying GFE

The trial court erred in not finding the search warrant here was saved by the good faith exception. “Upon review of the application, we find none of the scenarios proposed in Leon are present in this case. Thus, the trial … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Good faith exception | Comments Off on LA5: SW improperly suppressed without applying GFE

CA6: Officer observing “forced” baptism of drug offender as 1A & 4A violation gets QI for failure to intervene

A police officer was also a preacher. After a marijuana arrest, he elected to baptize the offender in an Ohio lake. He called Goforth, another officer, to attend, and that officer video recorded it. Later, the offender sued for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Officer observing “forced” baptism of drug offender as 1A & 4A violation gets QI for failure to intervene

W.D.Tex.: State SW doesn’t deprive federal court of jurisdiction

Federal courts had jurisdiction over defendant’s criminal case despite his initial arrest after execution of a state search warrant. Calzada v. United States, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86622 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 13, 2023). Disclosure of the CI who provided information … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: State SW doesn’t deprive federal court of jurisdiction

M.D.Pa.: Driving from source city to NYC on a “super drug corridor” with a prior importation charge wasn’t RS

During the traffic stop, defendant was directed out of the car and back to the patrol car to facilitate issuing a warning. Defendant was from Douglas, AZ and had a prior drug importation arrest. This also led to his patdown. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Driving from source city to NYC on a “super drug corridor” with a prior importation charge wasn’t RS

CA2: Inventory policy here was attached to pleadings and sufficed

The vehicle inventory search was testified to be within ATF policy, which was attached to the pleadings, and it was. United States v. Brack, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 12197 (2d Cir. May 18, 2023). Officers observed two people making likely … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on CA2: Inventory policy here was attached to pleadings and sufficed

CA9: SW application made “under penalty of perjury” satisfies the “oath or affirmation” requirement

A search warrant application made “under penalty of perjury” satisfies the “oath or affirmation” requirement. United States v. Morrow, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 11933 (9th Cir. May 16, 2023). Defendant prevailed on the merits of his honest services wire fraud … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Oath or affirmation, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: SW application made “under penalty of perjury” satisfies the “oath or affirmation” requirement

GA: Grant of Franks motion is subject to de novo review

The court erred in finding a Franks violation without considering whether the challenged representation in the warrant was made knowingly, intentionally, or in reckless disregard for the truth. On de novo review, that the trial court erred in finding there … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on GA: Grant of Franks motion is subject to de novo review

OH3: Officers had PC without regard to what CI said

The officers had probable cause for defendant’s stop without regard to what the CI said, so failure to corroborate the CI had no effect on the outcome. State v. Harrison, 2023-Ohio-1618 (3d Dist. May 15, 2023).* Defendant’s stipulated plea agreement … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OH3: Officers had PC without regard to what CI said

E.D.Pa.: Hospital nurse who found drugs on def wasn’t state actor

A nurse in a hospital who found drugs in defendant’s pants was required by policy to search the rest of his belongings. The nurse was not a state actor. United States v. Kunsman, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84362 (E.D. Pa. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Hospital nurse who found drugs on def wasn’t state actor

W.D.Pa.: Car parked in driveway was not on protected curtilage

Defendant’s car parked on his driveway was not on the curtilage. It was close to the house, but there was no enclosure or carport like Collins. United States v. Moses, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84247 (W.D. Pa. May 12, 2023). … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Pretext | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Car parked in driveway was not on protected curtilage