Author Archives: Hall

CA3 adopts two part functional rule of private search, and this one was

Defendant’s wife was not acting as an agent of the state when she procured defendant’s cell phone which produced evidence of sexual exploitation of a child. “Four of our sister Courts of Appeals assess whether a private party was an … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on CA3 adopts two part functional rule of private search, and this one was

CA4: Govt conceded delay for dog, but can’t show it was with RS

The government concedes that there was delay during the stop, but it was all without reasonable suspicion. The officer was looking for other summonses on defendant, including child support orders, where he had no idea there were any. “Finally, Deputy … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on CA4: Govt conceded delay for dog, but can’t show it was with RS

D.C.Cir.: ‘“Let me see your waistband’–amounted to a show of authority.”

“Here, Officer Tejada initially approached Gamble and asked him a question: ‘Ain’t got no gun on you, man?’” ‘“Let me see your waistband’–amounted to a show of authority.” United States v. Gamble, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 19695 (D.C.Cir. Aug. 1, … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: ‘“Let me see your waistband’–amounted to a show of authority.”

E.D.Mich.: A place probationer spent some nights wasn’t his official residence for probation search

Probation staff and the government failed to prove that the place searched under a probation search condition was defendant’s place. He was permitted to stay with relatives on occasion but those were not his residences. The search is suppressed. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: A place probationer spent some nights wasn’t his official residence for probation search

AZ: Defense should get discovery of victim’s GPS to try to make a defense

The defendant here sought discovery of the alleged victim’s GPS information from his car in an effort to prove someone else was involved in the crime. The court concludes that this is private action (although enforced by court) and the … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on AZ: Defense should get discovery of victim’s GPS to try to make a defense

CA11: Lawyers were arrested for interfering with cell phone search

In a CPS-type case, there was a search warrant for two cell phones with alleged child pornography on them, and officers were going to execute them outside a hearing in the courthouse. Watching on surveillance video, officers saw the phones’ … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Lawyers were arrested for interfering with cell phone search

RI: Officer doesn’t need to state a reason for occupants to get out of car under Mimms

Under Mimms, the occupants can be ordered out of the car during a stop. The fact the trial judge disagreed with the three rationales offered for it by the officer doesn’t matter. State v. Li, 2023 R.I. LEXIS 90 (July … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on RI: Officer doesn’t need to state a reason for occupants to get out of car under Mimms

N.D.Iowa: BIA officer conducted high volume traffic stops for drug interdiction

The officer here was a Bureau of Indian Affairs highway officer with four states in his purview. He admittedly stops a lot of motorists, and he also does drug interdiction. He stopped defendant for following too close, engaged in conversation, … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: BIA officer conducted high volume traffic stops for drug interdiction

D.Conn.: Apparent overbreadth in SW cured by GFE on how it was executed and on what

The search warrant didn’t specify the crime under investigation and that was a problem for particularity. That could have been cured by the affidavit being attached to the warrant at execution but it wasn’t. It was referred to in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Apparent overbreadth in SW cured by GFE on how it was executed and on what

SDT-U: Could San Diego Police Department’s smart streetlights program infringe upon privacy rights? [as in 500 pole cameras]

The San Diego Times-Union: Could San Diego Police Department’s smart streetlights program infringe upon privacy rights? By Lyndsay Winkley (“Experts say it’s hard to identify when surveillance technology encroaches on a person’s Fourth Amendment rights, but pervasiveness definitely plays a … Continue reading →

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on SDT-U: Could San Diego Police Department’s smart streetlights program infringe upon privacy rights? [as in 500 pole cameras]

CA6: Arrest paperwork delay here violated Riverside 48 hour rule

Officers’ apparent delays in processing paperwork on an arrest which resulted in plaintiff spending an extra two days in jail without any kind of probable cause finding violated clearly established law. Here, the prosecutor wouldn’t act without their paperwork. “It … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Arrest paperwork delay here violated Riverside 48 hour rule

CA6: In § 1983 case, exceptions to warrant requirement aren’t likely affirmative defenses to plead

Exceptions to the warrant requirement do not appear to be affirmative defenses required to be pled in a § 1983 case under F.R.C.P. 8(c) waived by not pleading in first response. Szappan v. Meder, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 19485 (6th … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA6: In § 1983 case, exceptions to warrant requirement aren’t likely affirmative defenses to plead

PA: Officers knocked before entry and defendant acknowledged their presence

Failure to comply with the knock and announce requirement could result in exclusion under state law. Here, however, the trial court’s findings of fact justified dispensing with the knock-and-announce requirement. Officers heard defendant acknowledge their presence, and then they entered … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce, Probable cause, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on PA: Officers knocked before entry and defendant acknowledged their presence

CA8: Pulling off a blanket during a stop on slight RS was unreasonable

Defendant got off a Greyhound bus in Omaha during a driver change. The officers just barely had reasonable suspicion to detain defendant, and pulling his blanket off amounted to a search. That enabled the officer to see he had a … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Nexus, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Pulling off a blanket during a stop on slight RS was unreasonable

CA3: The search exceeding the scope of a warrant justified suppression

The search exceeding the scope of a warrant justified suppression: “But here, the benefit of suppression is neither marginal nor nonexistent. The agents exceeded the scope of authority conferred by the warrant when they either ignored or disregarded the risk … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA3: The search exceeding the scope of a warrant justified suppression

W.D.Tenn.: Violation of police dept. vehicle chase policy doesn’t equate to a violation of the 4A

An alleged violation of department policy on police chases doesn’t equal a Fourth Amendment violation. United States v. Moore, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130238 (W.D. Tenn. July 27, 2023). Speeding and erratic driving justified the stop, and alcohol was seen … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Violation of police dept. vehicle chase policy doesn’t equate to a violation of the 4A

W.D.Va.: Info on def’s cell phone provided nexus for SW of house

Information on defendant’s cell phone linking him and Trafficker A also linked his home to the transactions and that showed nexus. United States v. Johnson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130082 (W.D. Va. July 27, 2023).* The information about defendant’s drug … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Nexus, Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Info on def’s cell phone provided nexus for SW of house

D.Nev.: Request of internet provider to preserve evidence under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f) is not a seizure

“Here, the Court finds that Omegle and TextNow’s preservation of evidence in response to the Government’s request under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f)—a provision of the Stored Communications Act—did not violate the Fourth Amendment for two reasons. First, because the preservation … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Request of internet provider to preserve evidence under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f) is not a seizure

NY3: Leaving one’s house to do a drug deal and returning is nexus to house

“Contrary to defendant’s contention, the CI’s basis of knowledge was not undermined by the fact that the CI did not actually enter the apartment during the controlled buys …. A sufficient nexus to the apartment was established by the continuous … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY3: Leaving one’s house to do a drug deal and returning is nexus to house

OH8: Dog alert on a car permits search of containers in it

A dog alert on a car was probable cause for a search of it and containers, here a backpack. State v. Kumuhone, 2023-Ohio-2586, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2554 (8th Dist. July 27, 2023). “The contemporaneous tip, the visual details that … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Foreign searches, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Seizure | Comments Off on OH8: Dog alert on a car permits search of containers in it