Author Archives: Hall

Cal.3d: Falsely telling def that officers wouldn’t tow his car if he consented to a search made the consent involuntary

Falsely telling defendant that officers wouldn’t tow his car if he consented to a search made the consent involuntary. Here, the officer’s statement as to the law was false. Boitez v. Superior Court, 2023 Cal. App. LEXIS 859 (3d Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Voluntariness | Comments Off on Cal.3d: Falsely telling def that officers wouldn’t tow his car if he consented to a search made the consent involuntary

CA10: No REP against officer running an LPN

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a license plate number. Officers can run any LPN number. They can also walk up to his car in his driveway and look at it. Becerra v. City of Albuquerque, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: No REP against officer running an LPN

NYT: CIA officer’s cell phone search case pled yesterday

The cell phone search case of the CIA officer noted here from two weeks ago resulted in a guilty plea yesterday to some counts. NYT: Former C.I.A. Officer Pleads Guilty to Sexual Abuse Charges (“The former officer, Brian Jeffrey Raymond, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on NYT: CIA officer’s cell phone search case pled yesterday

OH11: Person seeking return of property seized need not provide actual evidence in the petition

In a petition for return of property seized from a business, it was only required to show a possessory interest and likelihood of return. An evidentiary quality response isn’t required. State v. Allen, 2023-Ohio-4032, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 3869 (11th … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OH11: Person seeking return of property seized need not provide actual evidence in the petition

S.D.Ohio: Evidence in plain view may be seized during protective sweep

It was permissible for officers to seize firearms seen in plain view during this protective sweep. United States v. Riley, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198798 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 6, 2023). “Given the totality of the circumstances and the numerous distinctions … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Protective sweep | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Evidence in plain view may be seized during protective sweep

TN: No IAC to distance def from property of another and claim no standing

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress property that wasn’t his but where he spent time. The trial strategy was to distance defendant from the property, and asserting a reasonable expectation of privacy in the property … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Private search, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on TN: No IAC to distance def from property of another and claim no standing

CA8: Officer corroborated only CI’s objective information, not the crux, but that was enough for PC for automobile exception

There was no corroboration of the incriminating part of the CI’s tale that defendant, a convicted felon, kept a gun hidden under the hood of his car. “But Officer Princivalli had no reason to find Moore’s statements untrustworthy or unreliable. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Officer corroborated only CI’s objective information, not the crux, but that was enough for PC for automobile exception

NYLJ: Section 1983 Fabricated Evidence Claims—Focus on ‘Barnes v. City of New York’

NYLJ: Section 1983 Fabricated Evidence Claims—Focus on ‘Barnes v. City of New York’ (“Police fabrication of evidence gives rise to a steady stream of § 1983 fabrication of evidence claims, which frequently raise important, difficult legal issues. The recent decision … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on NYLJ: Section 1983 Fabricated Evidence Claims—Focus on ‘Barnes v. City of New York’

CA7: Misuse of dealer tag justified search incident

The district court decided this vehicle search on inventory. On appeal, the court goes with search incident because the vehicle was being driven with improper dealer tags. Officer “Hobbs’s search of the glovebox incident to Travis’s arrest was proper. Evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Search incident, Waiver | Comments Off on CA7: Misuse of dealer tag justified search incident

N.D.Ga.: SW for defendant’s email to show his and others’ state of mind at time of crime was not overbroad

The search warrant for defendant’s email accounts to show where he was when he accessed it, “evidence relating to the planning, execution, furtherance and/or concealment of the crimes under investigation,” and his “and other participants’ state of mind as it … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Overbreadth, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: SW for defendant’s email to show his and others’ state of mind at time of crime was not overbroad

M.D.Pa.: Police continually banging on def’s door to come out was seizure; no exigency applies; suppressed

Defendant fled from the police in his car in a highspeed chase. They went to his house and came on to defendant’s curtilage, his porch, and shined flashlights through the windows. This was a search on a constitutionally protected area. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Police continually banging on def’s door to come out was seizure; no exigency applies; suppressed

D.Nev.: Def can’t be conclusory attempting to show standing in a rented vehicle

Conclusory statement of standing in a rented vehicle fails without some proof. “Defendant’s expectation of privacy rests on his contention that he rented the Taurus on Turo and lacked knowledge of the possibly stolen character of the vehicle. But if … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Seizure, Stored Communications Act | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Def can’t be conclusory attempting to show standing in a rented vehicle

E.D.N.Y.: Police officer’s drug test while on sick leave for work injury was justified by RS

Plaintiff is a Suffolk County police officer on work-related sick leave. He was ordered to take a drug test while off, and the court finds it a search and done on reasonable suspicion. Volpe v. Ryder, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Police officer’s drug test while on sick leave for work injury was justified by RS

PA: Fleeing a traffic stop and wrecking car and then running off was abandonment of the car

Defendant fled in his car from a traffic stop and wrecked a few blocks away. He abandoned the car at the scene by running off. Commonwealth v. Hall, 2023 PA Super 224, 2023 Pa. Super. LEXIS 513 (Nov. 3, 2023). … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on PA: Fleeing a traffic stop and wrecking car and then running off was abandonment of the car

CA11: Gov’t adequately protected against A-C materials being searched in border search of Venezuelan attorney’s cell phone; “no privileged material was ever found”

Defendant was a Venezuelan attorney whose cell phone was searched at the border. He said there likely was privileged attorney-client information on his phone, but it was searched under a DHS protocols to safeguard privileged information and legal advice was … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Excessive force, Privileges | Comments Off on CA11: Gov’t adequately protected against A-C materials being searched in border search of Venezuelan attorney’s cell phone; “no privileged material was ever found”

NH: False information to officer during stop is independent crime even if stop illegal

Whether defendant’s stop was valid or not, her giving a false name and DOB was an independent crime that would not be suppressed. State v. Hellinger, 2023 N.H. LEXIS 188 (Nov. 2, 2023). Defendant’s posture driving an open air Jeep … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NH: False information to officer during stop is independent crime even if stop illegal

WI: Failure to respond to City’s letter to inspect rat-infested property was implied consent

The city wrote by certified mail to the owner of rat-infested property apparently abandoned since he hadn’t come from home in California since before Covid. State law allows inspections if requested and permitted. The owner never responded. His Fourth Amendment … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Dog sniff | Comments Off on WI: Failure to respond to City’s letter to inspect rat-infested property was implied consent

S.D.N.Y.: SW affidavit not yet available to def merely for bail application

Defendant doesn’t get to see the affidavit for warrant yet just for his bail application because the government asserts the investigation is still ongoing. Discovery of child pornography was inadvertent, and the bail application isn’t a discovery device. The question … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: SW affidavit not yet available to def merely for bail application

techdirt: Court Rejects Extremely Broad Google Search Warrant, Citing Both Carpenter And Riley

techdirt: Court Rejects Extremely Broad Google Search Warrant, Citing Both Carpenter And Riley by Tim Cushing. The case is State v. Grace from Ohio, posted here.

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overbreadth | Comments Off on techdirt: Court Rejects Extremely Broad Google Search Warrant, Citing Both Carpenter And Riley

GA: SW for things that were not controlled substances entitles target to return of the property

The search warrant here was for delta-8,9,10-THC but 8 and 10 are not controlled substances. Lacking probable cause for them, the search target is entitled to return of its property. Elements Distribution v. State, 2023 Ga. App. LEXIS 535 (Nov. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standing, Voluntariness | Comments Off on GA: SW for things that were not controlled substances entitles target to return of the property