Author Archives: Hall

S.D.Ohio: City’s mowing unkempt yard wasn’t 4A violatoin

The city’s coming on to a sovereign citizen’s yard to mow it when he refused did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Prows v. City of Oxford, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177976 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 30, 2024).* Defendant’s motion for return … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Trespass | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: City’s mowing unkempt yard wasn’t 4A violatoin

E.D.Wis.: Vehicle of arrested parolee still subject to parole search when he had no access to it

Even though this parolee was arrested and in custody, the vehicle he was in was still subject to search even though he was out of control of it at the time. His search incident on parole argument fails, too, as … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Vehicle of arrested parolee still subject to parole search when he had no access to it

CA1: Church rectory was objectively a single family dwelling; it had common living areas

It was reasonable for officers seeking a search warrant for a church rectory for child pornography to consider it a single-family dwelling. All the objective information was that it was single family residence. It turned out to be a residence … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA1: Church rectory was objectively a single family dwelling; it had common living areas

W.D.Pa.: A state court dispute over return of seized property held by feds heading toward contempt was removable to federal court

Defendant’s property was seized under a state search warrant. Defendant sought return in state court, but it had been transferred to federal officers. They refused return. Contempt was sought against the federal officers in state court and this was removable … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: A state court dispute over return of seized property held by feds heading toward contempt was removable to federal court

WA: Arrest and search for a probation violation of a conviction that could have been sealed but wasn’t yet was valid

While defendant’s drug conviction could have been sealed and thus not supported his probation violation arrest, it hadn’t been yet, and the arrest was still valid. State v. Balles, 2024 Wash. App. LEXIS 1937 (Sep. 27, 2024). “Having reviewed [the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on WA: Arrest and search for a probation violation of a conviction that could have been sealed but wasn’t yet was valid

D.P.R.: REP in workplace isn’t automatic; here there wasn’t any in a postal sorting area

A reasonable expectation of privacy in one’s workspace is not automatic. Here it was a postal worker in a sorting area, and that wasn’t private. United States v. Alarcón-Rodríguez, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175916 (D.P.R. Sep. 25, 2024).* “Because a … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.P.R.: REP in workplace isn’t automatic; here there wasn’t any in a postal sorting area

AL: Officer being unable to differentiate smell of MJ and hemp doesn’t negate PC

“Because probable cause does not require certainty, but only probability, we agree with the trial court that the fact that officers cannot distinguish between hemp and marijuana based on odor alone ‘does not void probable cause.’ … Other jurisdictions have … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AL: Officer being unable to differentiate smell of MJ and hemp doesn’t negate PC

AK: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases in Alaska. Alaska R.E. 412. O’Brien v. Delaplain, 2024 Alas. LEXIS 99 n.35(Sep. 27, 2024). The officer’s observations on a table near the door from outside the dwelling during a knock-and-talk provided … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule, Knock and talk, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases

D.Minn.: A cell phone tracking order was permitted where there was an arrest warrant for defendant

“Despite a dearth of binding precedent, this Court is satisfied that the existence of an active arrest warrant provides a sufficient basis for a magistrate judge to find probable cause to issue a tracking warrant allowing law enforcement to monitor … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Inventory, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Minn.: A cell phone tracking order was permitted where there was an arrest warrant for defendant

N.D.Okla.: Pipe on console of MMJ card holder not PC for plain view

A pipe on the car console of a MMJ card holder was not “immediately apparent” it was incriminating for plain view. United States v. Vasquez, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174528 (N.D. Okla. Sep. 25, 2024). Plaintiff filed his Fourth Amendment … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Pipe on console of MMJ card holder not PC for plain view

AR & PA: Def’s statements at time of search used at trial

Defendant’s DNA was taken by warrant at the jail, and his admissions about the offense during that captured on bodycam were admitted at trial. There was no questioning; it was voluntary. Torres v. State, 2024 Ark. App. 457 (Sep. 25, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Custody, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on AR & PA: Def’s statements at time of search used at trial

N.D.Tex.: GFE applies, but PC, too

The affidavit for the warrant here is more than “bare bones” so the good faith exception applies. “Even if the good-faith exception did not apply, the warrant is still valid because it is supported by probable cause.” United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: GFE applies, but PC, too

FL4: REP in Facebook private messages

(1) Florida’s 4th DCA finds a reasonable expectation of privacy in Facebook private messages as analogous to cell phone text messages. (2) When the records were seized under a warrant for a theft, they couldn’t be searched for evidence of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Scope of search, Social media warrants | Comments Off on FL4: REP in Facebook private messages

M.D.Pa.: No constitutional requirement to get arrest warrant for misdemeanor committed in officer’s presence

There is no constitutional requirement for an officer to get an arrest warrant to arrest based on a misdemeanor committed in his presence. The common law says the officer can. United States v. Alvarez, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172609 (M.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Community caretaking function, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: No constitutional requirement to get arrest warrant for misdemeanor committed in officer’s presence

OR: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to criminally dangerous person civil commitments

Neither the state nor federal exclusionary rule does not apply in criminal dangerous person civil commitments. State v. T.L.B. (In re T.L.B.), 335 Or. App. 225 (Sep. 25, 2024). The officer here saw defendant walking at night in a neighborhood … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to criminally dangerous person civil commitments

PA: The Rule of Law here counsels against suppression for a jurisdictional violation

A stop outside the officer’s jurisdiction in violation of statute should not lead to suppression of evidence. The rule of law counsels against suppression. The jurisdictional statutes are for accountabiliy. Commonwealth v. Eakin, 2024 PA Super 222, 2024 Pa. Super. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on PA: The Rule of Law here counsels against suppression for a jurisdictional violation

NE: Not IAC to not challenge state’s obtaining phone records

It was settled in this state long ago that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in third-party cell phone records. Therefore, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging it. State v. Rush, 317 Neb. 622 (Sep. 20, 2024).* On … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NE: Not IAC to not challenge state’s obtaining phone records

Security Boulevard: Virginia Court Strikes Down Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)

A trial court, so not binding: Security Boulevard: An Unexamined Life – Virginia Court Strikes Down Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) by Mark Rasch

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Security Boulevard: Virginia Court Strikes Down Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)

D.D.C.: Even if electronic search protocol is a const’l requirement, GFE applies

The lack of an electronics search protocol in the warrant, even if it was constitutionally required, doesn’t even have to be decided because of the good faith exception. “Okafor suggests that the Constitution might nonetheless demand that a warrant specify … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Even if electronic search protocol is a const’l requirement, GFE applies

CT: Exigency shown for animal control entry

“Our scrupulous examination of the entire record supports the court’s conclusion that the officers had reasonable cause to believe that the dogs contained within the barn were in imminent harm and neglected, or cruelly treated.” City of Middletown v. Wagner, … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Emergency / exigency, Waiver | Comments Off on CT: Exigency shown for animal control entry