Author Archives: Hall

techdirt: Federal Court Says Three Hits From Flock ALPR Cameras Isn’t Enough For A ‘Carpenter’ Violation

techdirt: Federal Court Says Three Hits From Flock ALPR Cameras Isn’t Enough For A ‘Carpenter’ Violation by Tim Cushing (“The Supreme Court’s Carpenter decision created a warrant requirement for obtaining location data from service providers. It was a limited ruling, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on techdirt: Federal Court Says Three Hits From Flock ALPR Cameras Isn’t Enough For A ‘Carpenter’ Violation

404media: Lawsuit Argues Warrantless Use of Flock Surveillance Cameras Is Unconstitutional

Just filing lawsuits doesn’t normally merit comment here, but this is an exception: 404media: Lawsuit Argues Warrantless Use of Flock Surveillance Cameras Is Unconstitutional by Jason Koebler (“It is functionally impossible for people to drive anywhere without having their movements … Continue reading →

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on 404media: Lawsuit Argues Warrantless Use of Flock Surveillance Cameras Is Unconstitutional

D.Minn.: While def was a passenger in a van, it was transporting his stuff, so he had standing

Defendant was a passenger in a van owned by a family member and transporting his stuff. He had standing to challenge the stop and detention. The stop was admittedly valid, and the extension of 15 minutes was based on reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in FISA, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: While def was a passenger in a van, it was transporting his stuff, so he had standing

W.D.Ark.: State remedy for return of property bars § 1983 claim for it

Plaintiff’s § 1983 suit for return of property is denied because there is a state law remedy, even if a federal claim was barred by Heck. Owens v. Samuel, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189894 (W.D. Ark. Sep. 24, 2024), adopted, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: State remedy for return of property bars § 1983 claim for it

M.D.Ga.: Cell phone search started before SW’s completion date isn’t unreasonable

The fact execution of the warrant on defendant’s cell phone took longer than the time limitation in the warrant doesn’t justify suppression if the search process started before its expiration. United States v. Hewlett, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189371 (M.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: Cell phone search started before SW’s completion date isn’t unreasonable

N.D.Ga.: Opening car door during stop requires RS

Opening a car door during a traffic stop requires reasonable suspicion and is governed by Terry. On the totality, officers had it based on a detailed BOLO. United States v. Crumbley, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189567 (N.D. Ga. Oct. 18, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Opening car door during stop requires RS

S.D.W.Va.: The fact officers planned to stop def doesn’t mean they weren’t credible when they said he committed a traffic violation to justify it

Just because officers planned to stop defendant if they had a traffic offense to justify it doesn’t mean that they weren’t credible when they testified there was a traffic violation. United States v. Murphy, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189184 (S.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: The fact officers planned to stop def doesn’t mean they weren’t credible when they said he committed a traffic violation to justify it

CA11: CI’s veracity wasn’t really specific enough, but it was still enough for the GFE to apply

“Second, the affidavit establishes the informant’s veracity. … But the statements about the informant’s reliability, while lacking specificity, are at the very least ‘indicia of probable cause.’ Whether or not probable cause existed, this warrant (though inartfully drafted) presents enough … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA11: CI’s veracity wasn’t really specific enough, but it was still enough for the GFE to apply

AZ: ALPR info from DEA could contribute to RS

A state officer running defendant’s car’s LPN through DEASIL (Drug Enforcement Agency Special Intelligence Link) showing its movements can contribute to reasonable suspicion. (Here, the vehicle was on a drug courier route twice before.) Also, defendant borrowed the car for … Continue reading →

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AZ: ALPR info from DEA could contribute to RS

D.Colo.: Failure to produce paperwork promptly justifies an extension of the stop

Defendant’s failure to promptly produce the insurance information and registration on his car justified ordering him out of the car and reasonably extended the stop. United States v. Malone, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188452 (D. Colo. Oct. 16, 2024).* 2254 … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Failure to produce paperwork promptly justifies an extension of the stop

NY3: Cell phones found in proximity to drugs isn’t PC in itself

The search warrant for defendant’s phone should have been granted. The application for the first warrant to search failed to establish probable cause. While the officer stated in the affidavit that a quantity of drugs were found in the motel … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY3: Cell phones found in proximity to drugs isn’t PC in itself

M.D.Fla.: T.L.O. informs the use of handcuffs in school v. excessive force

T.L.O. informs the use of handcuffs in school v. excessive force. Here, the student was objectively enough of a safety risk to justify handcuffs. “Further, because the Fourth Amendment reasonableness inquiry is an objective standard, more discovery to determine Defendants’ … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: T.L.O. informs the use of handcuffs in school v. excessive force

YouTube: What is the warrant requirement?

What is the warrant requirement? — YouTube from the National Constitution Center with Orin S. Kerr

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on YouTube: What is the warrant requirement?

IA: When there’s PC and the automobile exception, inventory irrelevant

There was probable cause for search of the car under the automobile exception so the impoundment and inventory are irrelevant. State v. Baylor, 2024 Iowa App. LEXIS 740 (Oct. 16, 2024).* Defendant’s car was parked with lights on at night … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Inventory, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: When there’s PC and the automobile exception, inventory irrelevant

NC: Defendant abandoned this real property

Defendant abandoned this real property. State v. Moore, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS 806 (Oct. 15, 2024). Failure to renew a motion to suppress when the evidence is offered is waiver in this state. State v. Rowdy, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on NC: Defendant abandoned this real property

CA3: Collective knowledge applies to reasons to extend a stop

With collective knowledge there was reason to extend the stop. United States v. McAliley, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 25982 (3d Cir. Oct. 15, 2024).* (After all, collective knowledge applies to reasonable suspicion too.) The USMJ’s decision denying the motion to … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Collective knowledge applies to reasons to extend a stop

Pre-Ordering “The Digital Fourth Amendment” by Orin S. Kerr

Reason: You Can Now Pre-Order “The Digital Fourth Amendment” by Orin S. Kerr (“My book will be out January 10th, but you can pre-order it now.” “I’m pleased to say that you can now pre-order my book, The Digital Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Pre-Ordering “The Digital Fourth Amendment” by Orin S. Kerr

YouTube: How has the Supreme Court applied the Fourth Amendment in the context of automobiles?

YouTube: How has the Supreme Court applied the Fourth Amendment in the context of automobiles? with Orin Kerr

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on YouTube: How has the Supreme Court applied the Fourth Amendment in the context of automobiles?

OH3: Even where the SW return was overlooked for a year, no exclusion

The state violated its rule 41 because the return was a year late. The exclusionary rule applies to constitutional violations, not rule violations, and the trial court erred in fashioning its own exclusionary rule here. State v. Nevels, 2024-Ohio-4964, 2024 … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Warrant papers | Comments Off on OH3: Even where the SW return was overlooked for a year, no exclusion

CA2: That a DNA sample was potentially excludable didn’t need to be disclosed in SW affidavit

There were two DNA samples here. The fact the second was potentially subject to suppression didn’t need to be disclosed in the affidavit for more testing. United States v. Green, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 25836 (2d Cir. Oct. 15, 2024). … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA2: That a DNA sample was potentially excludable didn’t need to be disclosed in SW affidavit