Monthly Archives: July 2025

CA3: Driveway was not curtilage

Defendant’s driveway was not curtilage, so his stop and ultimate search of the car was not in violation of the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Moses, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 16484 (3d Cir. July 3, 2025). De minimis force, even … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Curtilage, Excessive force, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Driveway was not curtilage

UT: Merely possible is not sufficient for inevitable discovery to apply

Merely possible is not sufficient for inevitable discovery to apply. State v. Abonza, 2025 UT App 101, 2025 Utah App. LEXIS 102 (July 3, 2025). Based on collective knowledge, there was probable cause for defendant’s stop. Morris v. State, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on UT: Merely possible is not sufficient for inevitable discovery to apply

OH: No REP in single location info entered into a phone app

Defendant’s single location information entered into a phone app that was used to set up a robbery was basic third-party information not protected by Carpenter. State v. Diaw, 2025-Ohio-2323 (July 2, 2025):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on OH: No REP in single location info entered into a phone app

E.D.Ark.: Reacting defensively to request for consent contributed to RS

[While it was thin,] The officer had reasonable suspicion for a dog sniff, including “react[ing] defensively when asked for consent to search the Sentra by making a facial expression, flailing his arms to the side, and offering unprompted explanations as … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Reacting defensively to request for consent contributed to RS

N.D.Iowa: USMJ recommends grant of motion to suppress; second SW to cure defects in first not proper for attenuation doctrine

The government admits that the warrant lacked particularity, but they sought to use the good faith exception to sustain a limited search. The problem there is that the person who sought the warrant didn’t search it, and he instructed the … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: USMJ recommends grant of motion to suppress; second SW to cure defects in first not proper for attenuation doctrine

KS: There’s a statutory right of def to SW affidavits

A person accused has a statutory right of access to search warrant affidavits in his own case. “The applicable provisions state only that the documents ‘shall be made available’ to defendants ‘when requested,’ without specifying to whom the request should … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on KS: There’s a statutory right of def to SW affidavits

W.D.Wash.: No 4A right to personal service of a SW

In this 2254, petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim that defense counsel didn’t object that the search warrant was not personally served on him wasn’t a constitutional requirement. Also barred by Stone. Witkowski v. Bennett, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126262 … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: No 4A right to personal service of a SW

CA1: Video of SW execution sufficiently authenticated for trial

The video of execution of the search warrant was sufficiently authenticated to be admissible at trial despite coming in through a witness other than the one who took it. United States v. Reyes-Rosario, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 16316 (1st Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Private search, Probable cause, Search incident, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA1: Video of SW execution sufficiently authenticated for trial

Reason: Do Arrest Warrants Have a Diligence Requirement?

Reason: Do Arrest Warrants Have a Diligence Requirement? by Orin Kerr:

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on Reason: Do Arrest Warrants Have a Diligence Requirement?

OR: Use of a powerful zoom to show covered up marijuana plants violated state constitution

Officers were doing a marijuana flyover looking for another operation and saw what appeared to be a grow operation on defendant’s property. The affidavit for probable cause only said that the officer saw and photographed evidence that could indicate a … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: Use of a powerful zoom to show covered up marijuana plants violated state constitution

CO: Incorporation of SW affidavit saves warrant from lack of particularity

“[T]he warrant in this case authorized collection of location data and certain message content surrounding the crimes. While the warrant could have been more particular by limiting each category using the language ‘related to the crimes,’ the warrant’s incorporation of … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CO: Incorporation of SW affidavit saves warrant from lack of particularity

WaPo: What is and isn’t legal when ICE officers make an immigration arrest

WaPo: What is and isn’t legal when ICE officers make an immigration arrest by Arelis R. Hernández (“Videos showing masked officers whisking people into unmarked cars have sparked outcry. A look at ICE’s powers as Congress prepares to give the … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on WaPo: What is and isn’t legal when ICE officers make an immigration arrest

CNS: Washington allows state, local police to execute tribal arrests

CNS: Washington allows state, local police to execute tribal arrests by Edvard Pettersson (“A change in state law will allow tribes certified by the attorney general’s office to avoid extradition proceedings to have wanted individuals returned to tribal lands.”)

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CNS: Washington allows state, local police to execute tribal arrests

W.D.Pa.: Someone actually succeeds in a Franks challenge

Defendant succeeds in a Franks challenge: Defendant’s case arose because the officer swore that defendant matched a surveillance video of a robbery. He really believed it, but he was wrong because there were obvious reasons to discount his belief. The … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Someone actually succeeds in a Franks challenge

KS: Arrest and search were in KCMO, trial in KCKS; 4A applies no matter what; no state law issues

Conflict of laws: Defendant’s arrest and search was in Kansas City, Missouri, but his offense was tried in Kansas City, Kansas. State law on this doesn’t matter. Applying the Fourth Amendment, it was all legal. State v. Green, 2025 Kan. … Continue reading

Posted in Conflict of laws, Good faith exception, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Strip search | Comments Off on KS: Arrest and search were in KCMO, trial in KCKS; 4A applies no matter what; no state law issues

CO: Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting SW for it was reasonable

Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting a warrant to search was reasonable. People v. Mills, 2025 CO 47, 2025 Colo. LEXIS 572 (June 30, 2025). Defendant’s cell phone was linked to his prostitution/human trafficking case, so there … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CO: Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting SW for it was reasonable