Monthly Archives: April 2022

Virginia Mercury: Virginia police routinely use secret GPS pings to track people’s cell phones

Virginia Mercury: Virginia police routinely use secret GPS pings to track people’s cell phones by Ned Oliver (“‘It’s as if the police tagged them with a chip under their skin’”):

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on Virginia Mercury: Virginia police routinely use secret GPS pings to track people’s cell phones

Since Sen. Cotton is one of my senators …

and I’ve been a criminal defender since November 1979 (after my stint at the local prosecutor’s office from mid-1973): WaPo: Cruz and Cotton cut to the chase on GOP’s suspicion of defense lawyers by Aaron Blake (“With their criticisms of … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Since Sen. Cotton is one of my senators …

N.-M.: In applying cost-benefits analysis of exclusionary rule, this was more than mere negligence and exclusion was necessary

In a military prosecution for adultery, the military judge found the search of defendant’s cell phone unreasonable and a violation of the Fourth Amendment but refused to suppress in its cost-benefits analysis. The court of appeals disagreed and found the … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on N.-M.: In applying cost-benefits analysis of exclusionary rule, this was more than mere negligence and exclusion was necessary

CA3: Def’s flight before the “Rodriguez moment” was on him

“We have ‘recognized the possibility that the Rodriguez moment occurs when an officer no longer pursues the tasks tied to the traffic stop even though he reasonably could have continued with those tasks.’ Garner, 961 F.3d at 270 (citing Green, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA3: Def’s flight before the “Rodriguez moment” was on him

PA: No apparent authority that def’s mother, a visitor outside, could consent to search

There was no apparent authority for defendant’s mother to consent to police entry. They knew she was a mere visitor herself, and she offered to let them in. She was not inside; she just came up when they were there. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Excessive force | Comments Off on PA: No apparent authority that def’s mother, a visitor outside, could consent to search

D.Colo.: A vehicle search for MJ that might have been legally possessed under CO law was still potentially a violation of federal law, and federal law controls

The probable cause analysis for arrest and search is the same. Defendant’s car was searched under the automobile exception in Colorado, and a quantity of marijuana was found. Federal law controls here (Virginia v. Moore), not state law and whether … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Colo.: A vehicle search for MJ that might have been legally possessed under CO law was still potentially a violation of federal law, and federal law controls

NC: Potential for destruction of car keys was not exigency here

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in a house he was visiting along with others late at night. When the police knocked, he answered the door, and that connoted some control over the premises. His disclaimer of ownership of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NC: Potential for destruction of car keys was not exigency here

WaPo: What to know about no-knock warrants

WaPo: What to know about no-knock warrants by Courtney Kan, Nicole Dungca, and Jenn Abelson (“No-knock raids, considered one of the most dangerous and intrusive policing tactics, have been at the center of a debate in recent years over police … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on WaPo: What to know about no-knock warrants

Techdirt: Law Prof Suggests Geofence Warrants Are A Net Gain For The Public, Even If They Invert The Probable Cause Standard

Techdirt: Law Prof Suggests Geofence Warrants Are A Net Gain For The Public, Even If They Invert The Probable Cause Standard by Tim Cushing (“On March 9th, we covered a Virginia court’s decision to reject a geofence/‘reverse’ warrant as unconstitutional. … Continue reading

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on Techdirt: Law Prof Suggests Geofence Warrants Are A Net Gain For The Public, Even If They Invert The Probable Cause Standard

Two on informant hearsay

“The information provided to the agents came from a vetted CS who had known Thomas for years. The CS’s information, as noted above, was then corroborated using audio recordings and physical surveillance as well as the agents’ independent check of … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on Two on informant hearsay

Free defense CLE on technology warrants

NACDL: 2022 NACDL and the Samuelson Clinic’s Seminar: Unlocking the Black Box, free CLE on technology warrants in Chicago May 16-17.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Free defense CLE on technology warrants

CA7: Younger and immunity bar ptf’s § 1983 claim against search

Plaintiff’s claims that the parties conspired to falsify evidence of this search against him, aside from being fantastical, was barred by Younger and qualified or absolute immunity for all the parties. Shaw v. Cnty. of Milwaukee, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Younger and immunity bar ptf’s § 1983 claim against search

E.D.La.: Photographs taken before SW issued or the SW are not suppressed, they had nothing to do with getting the SW

Metadata in photographs of defendant’s property show that they were taken before the search warrant was issued. The search warrant was going to issue anyway, and nothing relied upon the photographs. Denied. United States v. Jefferson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Photographs taken before SW issued or the SW are not suppressed, they had nothing to do with getting the SW

NJ: Facebook searches require SWs, not intercept orders

A communication data warrant requires probable cause. Facebook’s data in hand is not “intercepted” for wiretapping purposes. Facebook, Inc. v. State, 2022 N.J. Super. LEXIS 40 (Apr. 4, 2022):

Posted in Social media warrants | Comments Off on NJ: Facebook searches require SWs, not intercept orders

MI drone over curtilage case update

In the Michigan drone over the curtilage case (posted here), Long Lake Twp. v. Maxon, the parties are directed to brief application of the exclusionary rule to zoning disputes:

Posted in Curtilage, Drones | Comments Off on MI drone over curtilage case update

SCOTUS: Thompson v. Clark

Thompson v. Clark, 2022 U.S. LEXIS 1885 (Apr. 4, 2022) (ScotusBlog: “Larry Thompson’s showing that his criminal prosecution ended without a conviction satisfies the requirement to demonstrate a favorable termination of a criminal prosecution in a Fourth Amendment claim under … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Thompson v. Clark

Reason: One Cheer for Stephen Breyer

Reason: One Cheer for Stephen Breyer by Damon Root:

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: One Cheer for Stephen Breyer

CA6: There was PC for SW for real time pinging of def’s cell phone

There was probable cause for a search warrant for real time pinging of defendant’s cell phone to try and find out where he was. United States v. Ennis, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 8779 (6th Cir. Apr. 1, 2022). Defendant was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA6: There was PC for SW for real time pinging of def’s cell phone

CA8: Car seizure for overtinting and inventory were reasonable

Defendant’s car was permissibly seized for overtinting, and the subsequent search was reasonable as inventory. United States v. Perez, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 8697 (8th Cir. Apr. 1, 2022).* “Even assuming arguendo that Thrasher could make a substantial preliminary showing … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA8: Car seizure for overtinting and inventory were reasonable

E.D.N.Y.: Visual surveillance of a car in a parking lot is not a search; no REP in the license plate

Visual surveillance of plaintiff’s car in a parking lot is not a search. “Mr. Porter alleges that Investigator Tucci committed an unreasonable search by conducting surveillance of his vehicle in a parking lot and by looking up his plate and … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Visual surveillance of a car in a parking lot is not a search; no REP in the license plate