Category Archives: Reasonableness

CA8: Motion to suppress via motion for judgment of acquittal results in plain error review

Defendant’s motion to suppress was made as a motion for judgment of acquittal, so it was subject to plain error review, which it was not. United States v. Thornton, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 20109 (8th Cir. Aug. 4, 2023). “The … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Pretext, Reasonableness, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA8: Motion to suppress via motion for judgment of acquittal results in plain error review

W.D.Tenn.: Violation of police dept. vehicle chase policy doesn’t equate to a violation of the 4A

An alleged violation of department policy on police chases doesn’t equal a Fourth Amendment violation. United States v. Moore, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130238 (W.D. Tenn. July 27, 2023). Speeding and erratic driving justified the stop, and alcohol was seen … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Violation of police dept. vehicle chase policy doesn’t equate to a violation of the 4A

DE: SW issuing magistrate not barred from hearing suppression motion

The suppression hearing judge is not disqualified just because he or she considered the affidavit and issued the search warrant. Willis v. State, 2023 Del. LEXIS 238 (July 24, 2023). Setting inaccuracies in the search warrant affidavit aside, there was … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonableness | Comments Off on DE: SW issuing magistrate not barred from hearing suppression motion

MO: Virginia v. Moore does not require officer see the crime to have PC for arrest outside jurisdiction

Virginia v. Moore does not require that an arresting officer personally have seen the act that led to the arrest outside the officer’s jurisdiction as long as there was probable cause. State v. Barton, 2023 Mo. LEXIS 183 (June 27, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on MO: Virginia v. Moore does not require officer see the crime to have PC for arrest outside jurisdiction

RI: Exigency of hot pursuit in a homicide case made pinging cell phone reasonable

Despite Carpenter saying it is limited to historical CSLI, this court concludes there is no meaningful difference between real-time and historical CSLI under Carpenter. Exigency, however, was real. The police were in hot pursuit seeking to question defendant for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Hot pursuit, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on RI: Exigency of hot pursuit in a homicide case made pinging cell phone reasonable

PA: Justified inquiry about presence of a firearm didn’t unreasonably extend stop

It was reasonable during defendant’s traffic stop for the officer to inquire into whether he had a firearm because the officer figured out defendant was a security guard likely with a weapon. That did not unreasonably extend the stop. Commonwealth … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on PA: Justified inquiry about presence of a firearm didn’t unreasonably extend stop

KY: The conditions of parole factor into reasonableness of a parole search

Defendant did not properly preserve his state constitutional claim that warrantless parole searches should be more protective of a suspect’s rights than the Fourth Amendment. On the Fourth Amendment claim, the search complied with Samson and Knights. The conditions of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, DNA, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on KY: The conditions of parole factor into reasonableness of a parole search

E.D.Wis.: 40 day delay in getting cell phone SW was not unreasonable where def was still in custody and could not possess it

Delays in the case were to work out a plea agreement, not file motions. For that reason, the motion to suppress is denied. On the merits, the 40 day delay in seeking a warrant for his cell phone was reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: 40 day delay in getting cell phone SW was not unreasonable where def was still in custody and could not possess it

KY: Officer’s mistake of law on effective date of new traffic law was reasonable and stop not suppressed under Heien

Officer’s mistake of law on the effective date of a new traffic law was reasonable, and the stop would not be suppressed under Heien. Vincent v. Commonwealth, 2023 Ky. App. LEXIS 41 (June 9, 2023):

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on KY: Officer’s mistake of law on effective date of new traffic law was reasonable and stop not suppressed under Heien

E.D.Cal.: 30-minute seizure of cell phone in school that was never searched was not unreasonable

Seizure of a cell phone in school for 30 minutes that was not searched at all was not unreasonable. McGuire v. Roseville Joint Union High Sch. Dist., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98392 (E.D. Cal. June 5, 2023).* The warrantless blood … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Due process, Reasonableness, School searches | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: 30-minute seizure of cell phone in school that was never searched was not unreasonable

LA4: State carries burden on inevitable discovery and it failed here

Here there was a warrantless entry into the house for a gun. Defendant was in custody outside. The state had the burden on inevitable discovery and failed. “In the instant case, the state failed to point to any alternative lawful … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on LA4: State carries burden on inevitable discovery and it failed here

NY: Second SW for phone a year later after first SW failed to show PC wasn’t timely

The first cell phone search warrant was rejected for lack of probable cause. It only provided a generic description of cell phones as repositories of potential evidence without linking it to this case. The phone was still in the evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Scope of search | Comments Off on NY: Second SW for phone a year later after first SW failed to show PC wasn’t timely

S.D.Ga.: Review of PC for a SW is not de novo

Review of whether there is probable cause for a warrant is not de novo; it’s whether there is a substantial basis for finding probable cause, and there’s that here. United States v. Jones, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81177 (S.D. Ga. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Review of PC for a SW is not de novo

NE: Officer’s own sniff of unmarked bag on train was reasonable

Officer’s sniff of an unmarked bag on a train was not unreasonable. He was trained on the smell, and it interfered with no known person’s rights at the time. State v. Vaughn, 314 Neb. 167 (May 5, 2023). The officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on NE: Officer’s own sniff of unmarked bag on train was reasonable

N.D.Tex.: Arrest on NCIC warrant from Michigan reasonable despite it not labeled extraditable

Defendant’s arrest in Texas on a Michigan warrant shown on NCIC was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment despite the claim that it was not flagged for out-of-state extradition. Six months earlier, he was arrested and released before getting to jail … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Arrest on NCIC warrant from Michigan reasonable despite it not labeled extraditable

D.V.I.: No REP against a flyover of a MJ grow

There was no objective reasonable expectation of privacy in a flyover of a marijuana grow operation. A warrant to flyover and photograph was not required. United States v. Soogrim, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75183 (D.V.I. May 1, 2023). The court … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.V.I.: No REP against a flyover of a MJ grow

CA11: Roadside dog sniff during the records check was reasonable and did not extend the stop

A roadside dog sniff during the records check was reasonable even without reasonable suspicion and did not extend the stop. United States v. Ramirez-Rivera, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 10325 (11th Cir. Apr. 27, 2023). On collective knowledge: “As the surveillance … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Roadside dog sniff during the records check was reasonable and did not extend the stop

IL4: Despite legalization of possession of small amounts of MJ, dog alert still PC

The drug dog’s “positive alert on the vehicle in this case established a fair probability that drugs or evidence of a crime would be found in the vehicle. This is true despite recent changes in the law regarding the legalization … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on IL4: Despite legalization of possession of small amounts of MJ, dog alert still PC

OH12: Fact LEO broke traffic laws to catch speeder isn’t a 4A reasonableness defense

The fact a police officer arguably broke traffic laws to effect a stop of a fleeing motorist isn’t a defense to a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment or the state constitution. State v. Johnson, 2023-Ohio-1320, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH12: Fact LEO broke traffic laws to catch speeder isn’t a 4A reasonableness defense

NC: Arrest warrant for def permitted entry into house when he retreated inside; protective sweep valid

Officers had an arrest warrant for defendant for a violent crime, and he was found at home. They saw him outside, and he retreated inside. The SRT showed up too. The entry for the arrest was valid, as was the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on NC: Arrest warrant for def permitted entry into house when he retreated inside; protective sweep valid