Category Archives: Cell phones

CA5: Siccing police dog on woman in mental health crisis was excessive force; no crime involved

“Without any further attempts to subdue Sligh without the use of a dog bite, and without providing Sligh any warning that she may be subjected to a dog bite if she did not comply, Sutton sicced a dog on a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA5: Siccing police dog on woman in mental health crisis was excessive force; no crime involved

S.D.Fla.: Scrolling through electronic devices at the border is reasonable in CA11

Merely scrolling through an electronic device at the border is a reasonable border search. United States v. Vrdoljak, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208332 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 20, 2023). The officer was incidentally following defendant, and he observed her driving within … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Scrolling through electronic devices at the border is reasonable in CA11

N.D.Iowa: Even though stop showed def wasn’t impaired, DL and LPN could still be run

Even though defendant apparently wasn’t driving impaired, once validly stopped, the officer could run DL and LPN checks. The dog sniff didn’t prolong the stop at all. United States v. Drayton, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206461 (N.D. Iowa Oct. 10, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Even though stop showed def wasn’t impaired, DL and LPN could still be run

S.D.N.Y.: If the SW lacks PC, the remedy is a motion to suppress, not a motion to rescind the SW via 41(g)

Defendant filed a motion for the court to rescind the search warrant for his cell phone under Rule 41(g) because it was allegedly defective. The remedy is a motion to suppress, not to rescind. United States v. Cardenas, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: If the SW lacks PC, the remedy is a motion to suppress, not a motion to rescind the SW via 41(g)

CA5: After a fire at def’s trailer, his false statements as to his whereabouts added to PC for SW for cell phone

Defendant lived at a trailer that burned, and a body was found inside. After it was determined that he gave false information about his whereabouts that day, state officers got a search warrant for his cell phone and location information. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA5: After a fire at def’s trailer, his false statements as to his whereabouts added to PC for SW for cell phone

D.Vt.: Delay in searching one cell phone here leads to suppression but not as to a second one

Considering the four factors to consider in the delay in searching defendant’s cell phone, all the factors favor him. As to the exclusionary rule, “Because there is an ‘appreciable deterrent value’ in suppressing the evidence from the 9/15/22 Warrant, as … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, E-mail, Pretext | Comments Off on D.Vt.: Delay in searching one cell phone here leads to suppression but not as to a second one

N.D.Tex.: Protective sweep of meth lab property was objectively reasonable

The officers’ protective sweep of a property with a working meth lab was objectively reasonable. United States v. Moreno, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201424 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 9, 2023). Defendant’s cell phone was used during the period the rape victim … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Protective sweep of meth lab property was objectively reasonable

NYT: CIA officer’s cell phone search case pled yesterday

The cell phone search case of the CIA officer noted here from two weeks ago resulted in a guilty plea yesterday to some counts. NYT: Former C.I.A. Officer Pleads Guilty to Sexual Abuse Charges (“The former officer, Brian Jeffrey Raymond, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on NYT: CIA officer’s cell phone search case pled yesterday

OH11: Person seeking return of property seized need not provide actual evidence in the petition

In a petition for return of property seized from a business, it was only required to show a possessory interest and likelihood of return. An evidentiary quality response isn’t required. State v. Allen, 2023-Ohio-4032, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 3869 (11th … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OH11: Person seeking return of property seized need not provide actual evidence in the petition

D.Nev.: Def can’t be conclusory attempting to show standing in a rented vehicle

Conclusory statement of standing in a rented vehicle fails without some proof. “Defendant’s expectation of privacy rests on his contention that he rented the Taurus on Turo and lacked knowledge of the possibly stolen character of the vehicle. But if … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Seizure, Stored Communications Act | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Def can’t be conclusory attempting to show standing in a rented vehicle

CA11: Gov’t adequately protected against A-C materials being searched in border search of Venezuelan attorney’s cell phone; “no privileged material was ever found”

Defendant was a Venezuelan attorney whose cell phone was searched at the border. He said there likely was privileged attorney-client information on his phone, but it was searched under a DHS protocols to safeguard privileged information and legal advice was … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Excessive force, Privileges | Comments Off on CA11: Gov’t adequately protected against A-C materials being searched in border search of Venezuelan attorney’s cell phone; “no privileged material was ever found”

D.D.C.: Telling def the SW for his phone required his passcode was unreasonable because it didn’t

Defendant was in U.S. diplomatic service in Mexico, and he was accused of sex with drugged women there. Proof was ultimately found on his phone with a search warrant on his return to the U.S. Officers returned to his hotel … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Telling def the SW for his phone required his passcode was unreasonable because it didn’t

TX5: A safe removed from a car under the automobile exception was subject to search without a warrant

A safe removed from a car that was otherwise subject to search under the automobile exception was still subject to a warrantless search after it was removed and taken to the police station. Defendant’s effort to compare it to a … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Cell phones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on TX5: A safe removed from a car under the automobile exception was subject to search without a warrant

E.D.Mich.: CA6 previously suggested cell phone on drug trafficker was nexus to evidence, so GFE at least applied

The Sixth Circuit has suggested that a cell phone on the person of a drug trafficker likely has evidence of drug trafficking on it, so the cell phone warrant was issued with probable cause. Even if not, the good faith … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: CA6 previously suggested cell phone on drug trafficker was nexus to evidence, so GFE at least applied

DE: Def consented to search of his cell phone in an effort to prove his alibi

Defendant consented to search of his cell phone in an effort to prove his alibi. Blackwood v. State, 2023 Del. LEXIS 328 (Oct. 11, 2023). Defendant’s guilty plea wasn’t a conditional plea, so the search issue was waived. If he … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on DE: Def consented to search of his cell phone in an effort to prove his alibi

N.D.Cal.: Motion to suppress based on state court issuing judge lacking jurisdiction saved by GFE even if true

Defendant’s motion to suppress based on the state court judge issuing the warrant lacking jurisdiction is denied on the merits and by the good faith exception. United States v. Bailey, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179249 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Motion to suppress based on state court issuing judge lacking jurisdiction saved by GFE even if true

CA6: Smell of MJ on student’s person justified school search

The smell of marijuana on a student’s person justified a school search, and here it was their backpack then pockets. Stanford v. Northmont City Sch. Dist., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 26336 (6th Cir. Oct. 2, 2023). This § 1983 plaintiff … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, School searches, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Smell of MJ on student’s person justified school search

DE: No standing in another’s cell phone

There’s no reasonable expectation of privacy or standing in someone else’s cell phone. State v. Hunt, 2023 Del. Super. LEXIS 775 (Sep. 19, 2023).* Defendant was mistaken that GX48 for trial was the product of a search warrant. It wasn’t. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on DE: No standing in another’s cell phone

D.S.D.: Two anonymous tips about a car built upon one another and provided RS

Two anonymous tips about a car built upon one another and finding the car on the interstate was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Gonzalez, No. 422-CR-40119-KES, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167068 (D.S.D. Sep. 15, 2023). Defendant was indicted for conspiring … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Foreign searches, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Two anonymous tips about a car built upon one another and provided RS

M.D.Tenn.: Repeatedly re-asking for consent to search cell phone doesn’t make it coercive

“Guerrero argues he was coerced into consenting to the search because the agents continued to ask for consent after he avoided answering the question and they threatened to obtain a search warrant if he did not consent. True, the agents … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Repeatedly re-asking for consent to search cell phone doesn’t make it coercive