Category Archives: Informant hearsay

Reason: Denver Case Highlights the Potentially Deadly Hazards of Police Raids Based on Secondhand Information

Reason: Denver Case Highlights the Potentially Deadly Hazards of Police Raids Based on Secondhand Information by Jacob Sullum (“Michael Mendenhall wants the Supreme Court to reconsider a precedent that allows home invasions based on nothing but hearsay.”). Cert. petitions almost … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on Reason: Denver Case Highlights the Potentially Deadly Hazards of Police Raids Based on Secondhand Information

NM: Aguilar-Spinelli are still followed here and they were satisfied

Aguilar-Spinelli is still followed in New Mexico, and its strictures were met here. Motion to suppress properly denied, and court of appeals reversed. State v. Perea, 2025 N.M. LEXIS 91 (June 5, 2025):

Posted in Informant hearsay, State constitution | Comments Off on NM: Aguilar-Spinelli are still followed here and they were satisfied

CA9: No warrant required for CI to record def

No warrant was required for the CI to record defendant, following White (1971). United States v. Sudbury, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13921 (9th Cir. June 6, 2025). The state can’t be compelled to seek to unseal the CI’s testimony for … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Waiver | Comments Off on CA9: No warrant required for CI to record def

E.D.Va.: Lack of a recording for SW application in violation of state law didn’t violate 4A

There was no recording of the showing of probable cause for this state warrant that became a part of a federal prosecution. The lack of a recording isn’t fatal to the showing of probable cause found by the issuing magistrate … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Neutral and detached magistrate, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Lack of a recording for SW application in violation of state law didn’t violate 4A

MO: Uncorroborated anonymous tip wasn’t PC and GFE doesn’t apply

Uncorroborated anonymous tip: “Because the affidavit relies almost entirely on an uncorroborated anonymous tip and includes no information regarding the tipster’s reliability or the specific details of the anonymous tip, it failed to supply the warrant-issuing judge with a reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MO: Uncorroborated anonymous tip wasn’t PC and GFE doesn’t apply

MI: Lifetime electronic monitoring of this sex offender on parole not 4A violation

Lifetime electronic monitoring of this sex offender when on parole doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. People v. Van Mai, 2025 Mich. App. LEXIS 3912 (May 20, 2025). DUI checkpoint: “The only issue Defendant raises is whether the check point was … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Informant hearsay, Roadblocks, Waiver | Comments Off on MI: Lifetime electronic monitoring of this sex offender on parole not 4A violation

CA6: Affidavit about smell of MJ from house was not so bare bones GFE didn’t apply

“Even if the search-warrant affidavit at issue lacked probable cause, the district court did not err in denying Noble’s motion to suppress because the good-faith exception applies. The search-warrant affidavit is not bare bones.” The smell of marijuana coming from … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA6: Affidavit about smell of MJ from house was not so bare bones GFE didn’t apply

WA: 911 call about following a DUI was RS for stop

Officers could rely on a 911 call about an alleged drunk driver who was reporting what she was seeing. “Law enforcement officers may effectuate a Terry stop based on a 911 caller’s tip when the tip is reliable and contains … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Waiver | Comments Off on WA: 911 call about following a DUI was RS for stop

W.D.Wash.: Corroborated anonymous tip was enough for probation search

An anonymous tip “here predicted Dodd would engage in future criminal activity and the tipster explained how they knew this information. Bullard then investigated these claims and learned new, non-public information that corroborated many of the allegations.” This was “reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Corroborated anonymous tip was enough for probation search

D.Neb.: First time CI was corroborated

This first time CI, arrested the day before, was corroborated and there was probable cause. United States v. Schelling, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83754 (D. Neb. May 2, 2025).* There was reasonable suspicion with collective knowledge, and the search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Neb.: First time CI was corroborated

CA4: No downward variance for 4A violation in revocation of supervised release

Defendant was on supervised release and revoked. No downward variance because the search violated the Fourth Amendment and led to dismissal of that separate case. United States v. Corbett, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8758 (4th Cir. Apr. 14, 2025). “In … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: No downward variance for 4A violation in revocation of supervised release

VA: Arrest warrant not needed for DUI arrest in def’s driveway

Defendant wasn’t under arrest when he consented to a field sobriety test in his own driveway. Officers didn’t need an arrest warrant to arrest him there. Poulson v. Commonwealth, 2025 Va. LEXIS 17 (Apr. 10, 2025). The affidavit as a … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on VA: Arrest warrant not needed for DUI arrest in def’s driveway

N.D.N.Y.: No REP in workplace computer

Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his workplace computer. Zennamo v. Cty. of Oneida, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66916 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2025). One officer accidentally shooting another when using deadly force against a civilian was not an … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: No REP in workplace computer

OH5: CIs’ reliability shown by other facts

The CIs’ statements weren’t individually supported by a showing of why they were reliable. Instead, corroboration came from the rest of the detail in the affidavit. State v. Shannon, 2025-Ohio-1224, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 1188 (5th Dist. Apr. 7, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH5: CIs’ reliability shown by other facts

CA9: 71-day delay for iPhone SW was reasonable where software update was involved

71-day delay in getting search warrant to access defendant’s cell phone was reasonable where the delay was attributed to waiting for a software update for their device because the iPhone was a newer model. United States v. Powell, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: 71-day delay for iPhone SW was reasonable where software update was involved

D.Neb.: Officer asking same question three different ways didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop

Asking the same question of defendant a different way three times while doing the traffic citation did not unreasonably prolong the stop. The officer said he was not trying to be “robotic” sounding. United States v. Burns, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Officer asking same question three different ways didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop

CA10: Siccing police dog on sleeping man wasn’t subject to QI

Siccing a police dog on a sleeping man not subject to qualified immunity. Luethje v. Kyle, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6385 (10th Cir. Mar. 19, 2025). The CI’s information on a video showed his basis of knowledge and provided probable … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: Siccing police dog on sleeping man wasn’t subject to QI

D.Minn.: Probable cause for evidence of tax evasion in the home where records would be

Probable cause for evidence of tax evasion in the home where records would be: “Here, the affidavit sought to establish probable cause to believe Mr. Erickson took part in an ongoing scheme to evade paying taxes. Toward that end, the … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Probable cause for evidence of tax evasion in the home where records would be

E.D.Mo.: Single image that officer opined was CP is PC

“Under Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit law, Detective Erwin’s professional opinion [based on her experience] that the file contained child pornography was sufficient to establish probable case for the issuance of the search warrant. See Ornelas, 517 U.S. at 700; … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Single image that officer opined was CP is PC

CA10: Eight 911 calls about shots from a car essentially corroborated each other

“Taken together, eight corroborating emergency calls, all from the same general geographic area, all reporting gunshots, combined with the time of night and an exact match to the make, model, and color of the vehicle described in the call shows … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Eight 911 calls about shots from a car essentially corroborated each other