CA9: 71-day delay for iPhone SW was reasonable where software update was involved

71-day delay in getting search warrant to access defendant’s cell phone was reasonable where the delay was attributed to waiting for a software update for their device because the iPhone was a newer model. United States v. Powell, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6590 (9th Cir. Mar. 19, 2025).*

“We determine that Tate failed to preserve error on his argument that ‘the magistrate failed to make credibility determinations in the order granting the search warrant concerning the confidential informant.’ We therefore affirm without reaching the merits of Tate’s appeal.” State v. Tate, 2025 Iowa App. LEXIS 257 (Mar. 19, 2025).*

Appellant lost his Franks challenge below and then pled guilty without a conditional plea. He wouldn’t have won any appeal of the Franks challenge. United States v. Petitfrere, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50957 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 26, 2025).*

Exhibit A to the search warrant wasn’t present at the search so the officers didn’t know all that was seized. Here, plain view carries the search anyway. United States v. Gilmore, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6581 (11th Cir. Mar. 21, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.