OH5: CIs’ reliability shown by other facts

The CIs’ statements weren’t individually supported by a showing of why they were reliable. Instead, corroboration came from the rest of the detail in the affidavit. State v. Shannon, 2025-Ohio-1224, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 1188 (5th Dist. Apr. 7, 2025).

County of Riverside v. McLaughlin’s 48-hour rule doesn’t apply to arrests outside the U.S., here near the Dominican Republic with 978kg of cocaine. United States v. Palanco, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8081 (11th Cir. Apr. 7, 2025).

Defendant’s case supported the imposition of a suspicionless supervised release search condition. United States v. Poole, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8052 (2d Cir. Apr. 7, 2025).

Stopping defendant’s car because of knowledge of an extradition warrant was reasonable. United States v. Coles, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8049 (3d Cir. Apr. 7, 2025).

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.