E.D.Va.: Lack of a recording for SW application in violation of state law didn’t violate 4A

There was no recording of the showing of probable cause for this state warrant that became a part of a federal prosecution. The lack of a recording isn’t fatal to the showing of probable cause found by the issuing magistrate under the Fourth Amendment, no matter what state law says. With eight arrest warrants for defendant, the police also obtained real time location data for him, and that was also reasonable. And, “Even if the warrants were invalid, the Court has no reason to believe that the police deliberately, recklessly, or grossly negligently disregarded the Fourth Amendment.” United States v. Cox, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103449 (E.D. Va. May 30, 2025).

Omission of “some exculpatory evidence” from the affidavit for search warrant didn’t undermine the probable cause that was shown. Honesto v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 3727 (Tex. App. – El Paso May 30, 2025).*

While other Florida appellate courts have held smell of marijuana alone not to be probable cause for a search, here there is more making probable cause. State v. Simpson, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS 4138 (Fla. 6th DCA May 30, 2025).*

The anonymous tip plus a bit more was reasonable suspicion for a probation search here. United States v. Garrett, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102836 (E.D. Wis. May 30, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Neutral and detached magistrate, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.