Category Archives: Standing

D.Minn.: Disavowing ownership of the thing seized means no standing

“Here, Jackson appears to have denied any possessory interest in the SUV and the backpack. (Dkt. 22 ¶ 7 (‘Jackson was not the registered owner of the vehicle. He further claims all of the items in the vehicle and the … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Disavowing ownership of the thing seized means no standing

E.D.Ky.: § 1983 complaint against his state case is barred by Younger

Plaintiff’s § 1983 complaint against his state case is barred by Younger. Cuffee v. Cabuay, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 233153 (E.D. Ky. Dec. 27, 2024).* Defendant has no standing to challenge the search of another person’s cell phone. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: § 1983 complaint against his state case is barred by Younger

CA5: Ptf’s excessive force claim arising from a traffic stop expands Bivens

Plaintiff’s shooting during a traffic stop gone bad is an expansion of Bivens and is rejected. Hernandez v. Causey, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 32527 (5th Cir. Dec. 23, 2024). Defendant had standing to contest the search of his room at … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Excessive force, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf’s excessive force claim arising from a traffic stop expands Bivens

MT: Cell phone probation search condition based on generalizations of cell phones and crime was unreasonable

This cell phone probation search condition based on generalizations of cell phones and crime was unreasonable. State v. LeDeau, 2024 MT 305 (Dec. 17, 2024). Plaintiff makes numerous claims against a city short term rental ordinance, including a Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on MT: Cell phone probation search condition based on generalizations of cell phones and crime was unreasonable

D.S.C.: No standing in suitcase on def’s back porch he wouldn’t claim

Defendant didn’t have standing to challenge the search of a suitcase on the back porch of his house that he didn’t claim ownership of. United States v. Lane, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227893 (D.S.C. Dec. 17, 2024).* Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Issue preclusion, Standing | Comments Off on D.S.C.: No standing in suitcase on def’s back porch he wouldn’t claim

N.D.Iowa: Govt’s exigency claim to enter defendant’s garage is rejected

“To the extent defendants assert that the warrantless entry was necessary to continue a purported temporary detention of Wheelock to further their investigation, that is not a recognized exigency or exception to justify a warrantless entry into a home or … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Govt’s exigency claim to enter defendant’s garage is rejected

PA: State failed in its burden of proof on inventory policy

The state failed to put on proof of the impoundment and inventory policy, so the trial court erred in finding it was reasonable. Commonwealth v. Brinson, 2024 PA Super 293, 2024 Pa. Super. LEXIS 536 (Dec. 9, 2024). Defendant’s car … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Burden of proof, Exclusionary rule, Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on PA: State failed in its burden of proof on inventory policy

E.D.Mo.: Squatter owner had knowledge of still had no standing

Defendant was essentially a squatter who was wrongfully on the premises and had no standing. The owner lived on the second floor, and he squatted on the first floor for months. The building was condemned. His claim the owner’s tolerating … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Squatter owner had knowledge of still had no standing

N.Y.Co.: Shareholders cannot bring a 4A claim on behalf of a corporation that isn’t a party

Shareholders cannot bring a Fourth Amendment claim on behalf of a corporation that isn’t a party. Elfand v. Adams, 2024 NY Slip Op 24289, 2024 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 19021 (N.Y. Co. Nov. 18, 2024). The CI’s information led to a … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on N.Y.Co.: Shareholders cannot bring a 4A claim on behalf of a corporation that isn’t a party

N.D.Iowa: DUI stop justifies search for open containers

Defendant’s DUI stop justified a search for open containers, and a firearm was validly found. United States v. Stuckey, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207801 (N.D. Iowa Nov. 15, 2024). Defendant moved to suppress a cell phone warrant at the border … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Informant hearsay, Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: DUI stop justifies search for open containers

OH4: Return of cell phone denied; it’s still potential evidence, and part of delay is refusing to give passcode

“Based on our review of the record, we find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Smith’s motion for return of his electronic devices. At the time of Smith’s request, it appears that the property was still … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Privileges, Standing | Comments Off on OH4: Return of cell phone denied; it’s still potential evidence, and part of delay is refusing to give passcode

CA6: Shooting at officers executing SW justified 6 level USSG increase

Shooting at SWAT officers executing a warrant justified a 6 level Sentencing Guideline enhancement. United States v. Weaver, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 27036 (6th Cir. Oct. 24, 2024). The affidavit for warrant describing two CI’s buys from defendant at his … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Probable cause, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: Shooting at officers executing SW justified 6 level USSG increase

D.Mass.: Four-month delay in searching lawfully seized cell phone here not unreasonable

Four month delay in searching cell phones after lawfully seizing them was not unreasonable. “Defendant relies primarily on United States v. Smith, a Second Circuit case. … There, in assessing whether a thirty-one day delay between police seizing a tablet … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Probable cause, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Four-month delay in searching lawfully seized cell phone here not unreasonable

D.Minn.: While def was a passenger in a van, it was transporting his stuff, so he had standing

Defendant was a passenger in a van owned by a family member and transporting his stuff. He had standing to challenge the stop and detention. The stop was admittedly valid, and the extension of 15 minutes was based on reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in FISA, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: While def was a passenger in a van, it was transporting his stuff, so he had standing

S.D.W.Va.: The fact officers planned to stop def doesn’t mean they weren’t credible when they said he committed a traffic violation to justify it

Just because officers planned to stop defendant if they had a traffic offense to justify it doesn’t mean that they weren’t credible when they testified there was a traffic violation. United States v. Murphy, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189184 (S.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: The fact officers planned to stop def doesn’t mean they weren’t credible when they said he committed a traffic violation to justify it

WA: Arrest and search for a probation violation of a conviction that could have been sealed but wasn’t yet was valid

While defendant’s drug conviction could have been sealed and thus not supported his probation violation arrest, it hadn’t been yet, and the arrest was still valid. State v. Balles, 2024 Wash. App. LEXIS 1937 (Sep. 27, 2024). “Having reviewed [the … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on WA: Arrest and search for a probation violation of a conviction that could have been sealed but wasn’t yet was valid

N.D.Tex.: GFE applies, but PC, too

The affidavit for the warrant here is more than “bare bones” so the good faith exception applies. “Even if the good-faith exception did not apply, the warrant is still valid because it is supported by probable cause.” United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: GFE applies, but PC, too

D.Minn.: “Cars on the property” was particular enough for SW

“Cars on the property” was particular enough for the search warrant for defendant’s property. United States v. Stucky, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166040 (D. Minn. Sep. 16, 2024). Plaintiff inmate stated enough to proceed that he was subjected to harassing … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: “Cars on the property” was particular enough for SW

TX2: Overnight guest staying with a registered hotel guest has standing over the room

“[A]n overnight guest of a registered hotel guest shares the registered guest’s reasonable expectation of privacy in the hotel room and thus has standing to contest the search.” Fitzgerald v. State, 2024 Tex. App. LEXIS 6161 n.11 (Tex. App. — … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Inventory, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on TX2: Overnight guest staying with a registered hotel guest has standing over the room

N.D.Miss.: Def’s arguments against the PC showing in the SW go more toward a trial defense, not PC

Probable cause and good faith arguments about three images of child pornography in the affidavit out of 121 total, were more toward a defense of the charge and do not undermine probable cause. United States v. Murphy, 2024 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: Def’s arguments against the PC showing in the SW go more toward a trial defense, not PC