MT: Cell phone probation search condition based on generalizations of cell phones and crime was unreasonable

This cell phone probation search condition based on generalizations of cell phones and crime was unreasonable. State v. LeDeau, 2024 MT 305 (Dec. 17, 2024).

Plaintiff makes numerous claims against a city short term rental ordinance, including a Fourth Amendment claim. As to this claim, it is speculative and it is dismissed for lack of Art. III standing. Hause v. City of Fayetteville, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229421 (W.D. Ark. Dec. 19, 2024).*

Defendant was convicted of child endangerment of his own children. Police were called to his house by a neighbor concerned about the welfare of the children. A naked and obviously dirty child appeared alone at a window, and they entered to check on the child. The emergency exception applied. United States v. Myers, 2024 CCA LEXIS 535 (Army Ct. Crim. App. Dec. 16, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.