Category Archives: Franks doctrine

N.D.Cal.: Failure to pursue alleged traffic violation made stop unreasonable

Defendant was stopped ostensibly for a traffic violation, and he was handcuffed and the officers literally did nothing to investigate that–they didn’t even ask for his license and registration. Despite the fact Whren says pretext doesn’t matter, that lack of … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Failure to pursue alleged traffic violation made stop unreasonable

IA: RS: “cries of ‘please help me, don’t hurt me’ could lead an officer to infer that an assault is taking place”

Caller’s “cries of ‘please help me, don’t hurt me’ could lead an officer to infer that an assault is taking place.” That was reasonable suspicion. State v. Sinclair, 2024 Iowa App. LEXIS 74 (Ct. App. Jan. 24, 2024). “Cordova argues … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: RS: “cries of ‘please help me, don’t hurt me’ could lead an officer to infer that an assault is taking place”

SD: Failure to put SW materials in record means trial court presumed correct

There were two search warrants for location data and defendant’s cell phone. Without the search warrant materials in the appellate record, there’s nothing to review and the trial court is assumed to be correct. State v. Horse, 2024 S.D. 4, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Warrant papers | Comments Off on SD: Failure to put SW materials in record means trial court presumed correct

D.Me.: SW affidavit mentioned a licensing complaint against defendant doctor, but omission that the complaint was resolved favorably gets a Franks hearing

Defendant is a D.O. accused of over prescribing. She made her substantial preliminary showing to get a Franks hearing because the affiant omitted from the affidavit for warrant that the licensing authority considered the same claims and found she acted … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Me.: SW affidavit mentioned a licensing complaint against defendant doctor, but omission that the complaint was resolved favorably gets a Franks hearing

CA7: SW affidavit omitted things but it wasn’t intentionally or recklessly misleading

The affidavit was lacking some important information, but it was not intentionally or recklessly misleading to the issuing magistrate. Thus, defendant’s Franks challenge fails. United States v. Hueston, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 832 (7th Cir. Jan. 12, 2024):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA7: SW affidavit omitted things but it wasn’t intentionally or recklessly misleading

LA2: Anonymous report of man with a gun without some other possible crime is not RS

An anonymous tip that a man had a gun wasn’t reasonable suspicion. There was no report of any crime being committed at the time. State v. McCall, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 27 (La. App. 2 Cir. Jan. 10, 2024). Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA2: Anonymous report of man with a gun without some other possible crime is not RS

CA11: Austrian SW executed in Austria couldn’t be questioned here under “act of state” doctrine

Plaintiff, apparently while in the United States, had his property in Austria searched by Austrian authorities with an Austrian search warrant. [Aside from what jurisdiction is there here?,] The “act of state” doctrine prohibits a U.S. court from questioning the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA11: Austrian SW executed in Austria couldn’t be questioned here under “act of state” doctrine

TX1: Arrest on PC when standing next to vehicle justified its search incident

Defendant’s arrest for a parole violation while he was standing next to his vehicle resulted in a search of the person finding drugs, and that justified a search incident of the vehicle, too. Badyrka v. State, 2024 Tex. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Search incident | Comments Off on TX1: Arrest on PC when standing next to vehicle justified its search incident

N.D.Iowa: Police car pulling up with activated blue and red lights wasn’t necessarily a seizure; here, it is not

“I conclude that a law enforcement officer’s activation of red and blue emergency does not, by itself, establish a seizure for Fourth Amendment purposes. However, it is a factor that weighs in favor of finding a seizure. Certain other facts … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Police car pulling up with activated blue and red lights wasn’t necessarily a seizure; here, it is not

CA10: City driveway shared with house next door not curtilage

A driveway shared with the house next door was not curtilage. A driveway in a city usually isn’t anyway. United States v. Vasquez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 75 (10th Cir. Jan. 3, 2024). Defendant’s objection to the R&R that the … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Search incident | Comments Off on CA10: City driveway shared with house next door not curtilage

D.N.M.: Squatter in building labeled “unsafe” had no standing

Defendant was a squatter in a building with posted sign warning it was substandard and unsafe. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the premises. United States v. Guzman, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 550 (D.N.M. Jan. 2, 2024). Michael … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Squatter in building labeled “unsafe” had no standing

LA5: Omission wasn’t material for Franks and it was only negligent, if anything

“There is no evidence to demonstrate that any omission of Mr. Daleo’s prior statement in the probable cause affidavits was intentional. Further, we find the applications demonstrate that the attesting officers had reasonable grounds to believe that defendant’s residence and … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on LA5: Omission wasn’t material for Franks and it was only negligent, if anything

E.D.Mich.: Typo in affidavit for SW doesn’t support Franks challenge

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails. “At the hearing, Hill presented nothing to establish that this inconsistency was anything other than a negligent typographical error. While he maintained that the affidavits were riddled with falsehoods, he was unable—despite repeated questioning—to pinpoint any … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Typo in affidavit for SW doesn’t support Franks challenge

GA: A court order for medical records by statute requires PC

There is a statutory privacy interest in one’s medical records, and an “appropriate court order” is required for the government to access them in a criminal case. An ex parte order not shown to be based on probable cause is … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA: A court order for medical records by statute requires PC

M.D.Pa.: Cut-and-paste errors and delay in execution and discovery results in suppression of cell phone

A Franks violation from cut-and-paste of another cell phone search affidavit resulted in serious factual errors in this one. Coupled with the government’s late disclosure of the phone’s contents despite a date certain trial, the court concludes the exclusionary rule … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Cut-and-paste errors and delay in execution and discovery results in suppression of cell phone

CA4: 2255 pet’r gets discovery and evidentiary hearing on “dirty cop” the govt both embraced and disavowed at its convenience

2255 petitioner gets an evidentiary hearing on his motion to withdraw his guilty plea after he discovered the affiant, who he’d previously complained to all was a “dirty cop,” actually lied on the search warrant affidavit back in 2015. At … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA4: 2255 pet’r gets discovery and evidentiary hearing on “dirty cop” the govt both embraced and disavowed at its convenience

D.Haw.: Def’s use of known alias to rent property gave standing

Rental of storage unit in one of defendant’s known aliases gave him standing. United States v. Eberhart, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 222575 (D. Haw. Dec. 14, 2023). Defendant’s Franks challenge fails for lack of the proffer of good reason. Aside … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on D.Haw.: Def’s use of known alias to rent property gave standing

D.N.J.: Expert saying drug dog not reliable not a Franks issue

Defendant’s expert report that the drug dog here wasn’t reliable doesn’t make a Franks challenge. Besides, there was good faith as to it. United States v. Estevez-Castillo, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 221601 (D.N.J. Dec. 13, 2023). That officers created the … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Knock and talk | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Expert saying drug dog not reliable not a Franks issue

D.S.D.: Def’s lies to police during arrest completely undermines his credibility in a pro se Franks challenge

Defendant pro se makes allegations of a Franks violation but nothing substantive is offered for the “substantial preliminary showing.” Moreover, because he lied to the officers during his arrest, the court finds him without credibility. United States v. Ward, 2023 … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Consent, Franks doctrine, Strip search | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Def’s lies to police during arrest completely undermines his credibility in a pro se Franks challenge

NY1: Def’s Franks challenge denial and 7 year sentence summarily affirmed 7½ years later

“Defendant’s request for a Franks hearing was properly summarily denied. He failed to make a ‘substantial preliminary showing’ that the purported statements he made to his wife and at the precinct relating to his ownership of the vehicle were false … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY1: Def’s Franks challenge denial and 7 year sentence summarily affirmed 7½ years later