Category Archives: Waiver

CA7: Despite govt’s not raising abandonment, the court finds it anyway

The government conceded no abandonment and sought other exceptions to the warrant requirement. The court of appeals finds abandonment anyway because the record is clear. In addition, an allegation of a Franks violation fails without alleging that probable cause does … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on CA7: Despite govt’s not raising abandonment, the court finds it anyway

N.D.Ga.: Pro forma objection to R&R doesn’t articulate argument, so it’s waived

Defendant didn’t fairly articulate his objections to the R&R, so his objection is waived. United States v. Hill, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83707 (N.D.Ga. May 9, 2022). There was probable cause for this search authorization, and the good faith exception … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Military searches, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Pro forma objection to R&R doesn’t articulate argument, so it’s waived

D.Kan.: 10 weeks of pole camera surveillance in disability fraud investigation was reasonable

Defendant was on disability. The government placed a pole camera across the street from his house to see whether he was able or not, and he was indicted for theft of public funds. Ten weeks of pole camera surveillance was … Continue reading →

Posted in Pole cameras, Roadblocks, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Kan.: 10 weeks of pole camera surveillance in disability fraud investigation was reasonable

IN: State const’l arguments have to be raised in trial court first

Defendant’s argument for a change in standing law under the state constitution that he should have the ability to challenge the search of another person’s person and clothing wasn’t raised below, so it’s waived. State v. Allen, 2022 Ind. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Overbreadth, Reasonableness, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on IN: State const’l arguments have to be raised in trial court first

D.Mont.: Acting strange walking down the street is not RS

“While Vasquez was indeed acting strangely, for the stop to be valid, his conduct must be indicative of criminal behavior. The Court here simply cannot bridge the connection between the conduct here that is suspicious or odd in the lay … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Acting strange walking down the street is not RS

OH1: GPS pings on stolen vehicle led to attempted knock-and-talk and observation of its tracks

Officers following a GPS ping on stolen vehicle with off-road tires came to defendant’s home for a knock-and-talk. Receiving no answer, the officer followed the driveway and saw three storage buildings. “Because the driveway is open to the public and … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Curtilage, Knock and talk, Waiver | Comments Off on OH1: GPS pings on stolen vehicle led to attempted knock-and-talk and observation of its tracks

NY3: Pleading guilty after suppression hearing but before decision is waiver

Pleading guilty after the suppression hearing but before it was decided is waiver. People v. Lende, 2022 NY Slip Op 02581, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2476 (3d Dept. Apr. 21, 2022). The stop here was with reasonable suspicion. Officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on NY3: Pleading guilty after suppression hearing but before decision is waiver

MO: Def’s actions when coming upon a ruse checkpoint on I-44 was RS

“[T]he procedures of the ruse drug checkpoint, coupled with Defendant’s conduct of abruptly changing lanes and taking Exit 33 at the last second, meets the standard for individualized suspicion required by Edmond and Mack.” State v. Barnum, 2022 Mo. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: Def’s actions when coming upon a ruse checkpoint on I-44 was RS

D.C.Cir.: Admin. law: 4A claims must be brought at agency level first

In an action before the Board for Correction of Naval Records, the service member had to raise his Fourth Amendment claim before the agency or it is waived, which is what happened here. McPherson v. Del Toro, Sec’y of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Particularity, Waiver | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Admin. law: 4A claims must be brought at agency level first

E.D.Okla.: Lack of nexus to cell phone saved by GFE

The affidavit for the search warrant for defendant’s phone didn’t show nexus, but it was still relied upon in good faith. R&R rejected. United States v. Langford, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55162 (E.D.Okla. Mar. 28, 2022). Sounds and observations of … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Nexus, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Lack of nexus to cell phone saved by GFE

WI: After suppression of blood BAC test in hospital, SDT for hospital’s own test reasonable and independent

“After crashing his car, Daniel Van Linn was taken to the hospital, where two blood tests were performed: the first one by the hospital for diagnostic and treatment purposes; a later one at the direction of a sheriff’s deputy for … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Independent source, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on WI: After suppression of blood BAC test in hospital, SDT for hospital’s own test reasonable and independent

D.Guam: Issuing magistrate’s later recusal for knowing target’s dad doesn’t show he wasn’t neutral and detached

After search warrant was issued, the issuing magistrate recused from the rest of the matter because defendant’s father was a longstanding employee of the court. There apparently was no relationship with defendant. This did not present a constitutional problem for … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Guam: Issuing magistrate’s later recusal for knowing target’s dad doesn’t show he wasn’t neutral and detached

D.Neb.: State officer’s jurisdiction is not a 4A question

State officers outside their jurisdiction making an arrest is not alone a Fourth Amendment violation. Virginia v. Moore. United States v. Blair, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47833 (D.Neb. Mar. 17, 2022).* Defendant found to have consented to a search after … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Voluntariness, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Neb.: State officer’s jurisdiction is not a 4A question

CA9: Fed SW for state SW product was with PC and cured alleged deficiencies in state affidavit

The state obtained phone records by search warrant which defendant claimed was without probable cause. The federal government also got a search warrant for the same records from the state, and it showed probable cause. That was via independent source. … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on CA9: Fed SW for state SW product was with PC and cured alleged deficiencies in state affidavit

NY Oneida: Order for DNA sample doesn’t require a pending criminal case

A DNA sample can be sought by court order before a criminal case is filed. People v. Forte, 2022 NY Slip Op 22066, 2022 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 873 (Oneida Co. Mar. 9, 2022). The scope and manner of the stop … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on NY Oneida: Order for DNA sample doesn’t require a pending criminal case

CA2: Hand-to-hand transaction supports search incident

Hand-to-hand transaction as probable cause supports search incident to arrest. United States v. Campbell, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 6060 (2d Cir. Mar. 9, 2022). This is a prison employee drug testing case. The employee left the premises rather than submit … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Search incident, Waiver | Comments Off on CA2: Hand-to-hand transaction supports search incident

D.Ariz.: Telling def to get out of vehicle and sit on curb is seizure

“The Court concludes that the encounter transformed into a seizure only moments later, when Deputy Baptista asked Defendant to step out of the vehicle and have a seat on the curb. Although these requests were phrased as questions, they would … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Telling def to get out of vehicle and sit on curb is seizure

ID: 5th wheel trailer parked, slides out, and hooked up to electricity was an outbuilding subject to the SW

A fifth-wheel trailer parked, jacked, chocked, with extensions out and hooked up to electricity was on the property to be searched. It was not specified in the warrant, but it was treated as an outbuilding covered by the warrant. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Good faith exception, Scope of search, Waiver | Comments Off on ID: 5th wheel trailer parked, slides out, and hooked up to electricity was an outbuilding subject to the SW

D.Neb.: Officer’s personal knowledge of the accused and the place to be searched is sufficient for PC

“In short, if the source of the information here had been a citizen-informant rather than a law enforcement officer, this assertion of personal knowledge by a known informant, under oath and personally present before the clerk-magistrate, combined with corroborating details … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Open fields, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Officer’s personal knowledge of the accused and the place to be searched is sufficient for PC

CO: While trial court erred in considering officers’ subjective intent, there still wasn’t RS

“We conclude that while the trial court erred in considering the officers’ subjective intent in effectuating the seizure, it was nonetheless correct that the officers lacked reasonable and articulable suspicion to detain Brown. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CO: While trial court erred in considering officers’ subjective intent, there still wasn’t RS