MO: Def’s actions when coming upon a ruse checkpoint on I-44 was RS

“[T]he procedures of the ruse drug checkpoint, coupled with Defendant’s conduct of abruptly changing lanes and taking Exit 33 at the last second, meets the standard for individualized suspicion required by Edmond and Mack.” State v. Barnum, 2022 Mo. App. LEXIS 174 (Mar. 30, 2022).

Failure to fully argue a suppression motion and then get a ruling was waiver. State v. Milstead, 2022 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 144 (Mar. 30, 2022).*

The lack of a time limitation in the search warrant for complex business records was not overbroad. A lesser time period may have been ideal, but that doesn’t make this one unreasonable. United States v. Farhat, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60240 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.