Author Archives: Hall

CA8: Duty to warn of use of police dog was clearly established

Officers sicced a police dog on plaintiff who was fleeing, but without warning. Use of a police dog usually requires a warning. “The warning requirement was clearly established by the time of Cameron’s arrest. As we stated in Adams, Kuha … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA8: Duty to warn of use of police dog was clearly established

CNS: Iowa accuses General Motors of not disclosing OnStar data sharing

CNS: Iowa accuses General Motors of not disclosing OnStar data sharing by Rox Laird (“General Motors failed to disclose to car buyers that driving data collected by the automaker’s OnStar program installed in its vehicles is sold to auto insurance … Continue reading

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CNS: Iowa accuses General Motors of not disclosing OnStar data sharing

CNS: Judge finds IRS violated the law thousands of times by handing over taxpayer addresses to ICE

CNS: Judge finds IRS violated the law thousands of times by handing over taxpayer addresses to ICE by Ryan Knappenberger (“A federal judge on Thursday slammed the Internal Revenue Service for handing over confidential taxpayer information to the U.S. Immigration … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CNS: Judge finds IRS violated the law thousands of times by handing over taxpayer addresses to ICE

N.D. Iowa: Drug dog’s 50% hit rate was reliable enough

Past cases in this circuit hold that even a drug dog’s 50% hit rate is sufficient for probable cause. “And other indications of the presence of illicit drugs can rehabilitate a less-than-reliable canine alert.” United States v. Harbach, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on N.D. Iowa: Drug dog’s 50% hit rate was reliable enough

CA6: Ptf’s expert in a civil Franks claim only provided a legal conclusion, and “That’s not enough”

Plaintiff in a civil Franks claim failed to show that the officer knowingly misrepresented facts. Of note, however, is that he used an expert witness on falsity which essentially only provided a legal conclusion. Chancellor v. Geelhood, 2026 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA6: Ptf’s expert in a civil Franks claim only provided a legal conclusion, and “That’s not enough”

OH9: Smell of burnt MJ justified search even though officers found none

The smell of burnt marijuana justified the search of defendant’s car even though none was found. State v. Dejournett, 2026-Ohio-640 (9th Dist. Feb. 25, 2026).* An empty beer can in the beverage holder doesn’t justify a search of the car. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH9: Smell of burnt MJ justified search even though officers found none

GA: Def let someone use his computer, and they found letters they turned over to the police in a private search

Private search: Defendant let someone use his computer and that person found two incriminating letters which were turned over to the police. Bunn v. State, 2026 Ga. App. LEXIS 110 (Feb. 25, 2026).* The parties agreed that references to the … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Private search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on GA: Def let someone use his computer, and they found letters they turned over to the police in a private search

E.D.Va.: WaPo SW: gov’t squandered deference by failing to cite Privacy Protection Act

WaPo reporter search warrant: The government failed to even acknowledge the Privacy Protection Act of 1980 in its warrant application. “The government’s conduct has disturbed that baseline posture of deference” that it always gets. In re Search of the Real … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: WaPo SW: gov’t squandered deference by failing to cite Privacy Protection Act

D.S.D.: Volatile home situation justified sweep for gun

A volatile situation in the house justified an exigency search (or sweep) of other rooms for a weapon. United States v. Boyd, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38079 (D.S.D. Feb. 23, 2026).* 2254 petitioner’s CSLI claim and trial were all before … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Neutral and detached magistrate, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Volatile home situation justified sweep for gun

IL: Probationer’s ankle monitor search put him at scene of murder

A codefendant was on probation, and a search warrant was used to get information from his ankle monitor. That put him at the scene of a murder. People v. Irby, 2026 IL App (4th) 241389 (Feb. 23, 2026).* Separate exigency … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Probationer’s ankle monitor search put him at scene of murder

W.D.Okla.: Def bears no burden on applying crime-fraud exception to his cell phone search

The government seized this Oklahoman’s cell phone and searched it with a warrant. Oklahoma is largely marijuana legal. Pleading the crime-fraud exception, the government bears the burden of segregating the valid conversations from the federal conspiracy allegations. Defendant bears no … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Privileges, Probable cause, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Def bears no burden on applying crime-fraud exception to his cell phone search

S.D.Fla.: No dog alert shown on video

Defendant’s stop in front of his house on the curtilage was a valid stop. A dog sniff was based on reasonable suspicion but the court finds no valid alert. The search of the car came after an ambiguous statement from … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Dog sniff | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: No dog alert shown on video

E.D.Mo. sustains geofence warrant

Noting Chatrie is pending and that the Eighth Circuit hasn’t ruled, but has in something close, the court denies suppression of a geofence warrant. United States v. Washington, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37462 (E.D. Mo. Feb. 4, 2026)*:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on E.D.Mo. sustains geofence warrant

CA6: Administrative search that is a ruse for a criminal search was clearly established as 4A violation

An administrative search that is a ruse for a criminal search was clearly established at the time this one happened. Qualified immunity denied. Generis Ent., LLC v. Donley, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5197 (6th Cir. Feb. 19, 2026). Not the … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Administrative search, Franks doctrine, Pretext | Comments Off on CA6: Administrative search that is a ruse for a criminal search was clearly established as 4A violation

Wired: Here’s What a Google Subpoena Response Looks Like, Courtesy of the Epstein Files

Wired: Here’s What a Google Subpoena Response Looks Like, Courtesy of the Epstein Files by Maddie Varner (“The US Justice Department disclosures give fresh clues about how tech companies handle government inquiries about your data.”)

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on Wired: Here’s What a Google Subpoena Response Looks Like, Courtesy of the Epstein Files

M.D.Fla.: Frisk on entering VA hospital was justified on RS

Defendant’s frisk on entering a VA hospital could be justified as an area entry search, but the facts known to the officers, that defendant was already considered a safety risk, justified it by reasonable suspicion under Terry. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Frisk on entering VA hospital was justified on RS

CA4: Leasing property from a parolee doesn’t make that property subject to his parole search condition

When a person on parole owns property and lets others use or rent it, the others aren’t subject to the parolee’s search waiver. United States v. Perez, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5305 (4th Cir. Feb. 23, 2026):

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA4: Leasing property from a parolee doesn’t make that property subject to his parole search condition

D.N.J.: One without a DL can still have standing in the car he’s driving

Defendant was driving a borrowed car without a valid DL. He still has standing, and that’s not conditioned on a driver’s license. United States v. Huggins, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34758 (D.N.J. Feb. 20, 2026). Defendant’s vehicle was parked unlocked … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.J.: One without a DL can still have standing in the car he’s driving

D.Utah: Asking about drug history during traffic stop lacked RS and unreasonably extended stop

“Considering the totality of the circumstances, there are insufficient facts before the court to establish reasonable suspicion that would allow Officer Embley to prolong the stop and inquire about Kummer’s drug history. Reasonable suspicion is a low standard, but it … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on D.Utah: Asking about drug history during traffic stop lacked RS and unreasonably extended stop

S.D.N.Y.: No REP in what is shared with a cloud AI program

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in what is shared with a cloud AI program, even if it’s in anticipation of litigation. Therefore, no attorney-client privilege in what the client shares with AI trying to help his attorney. United … Continue reading

Posted in AI, Apparent authority, Computer and cloud searches, Emergency / exigency, Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No REP in what is shared with a cloud AI program