CA3: Incidental conversation during a traffic stop about def’s watch and job didn’t unreasonably extend the stop

Incidental conversation during a traffic stop about defendant’s watch and job didn’t unreasonably extend the stop. United States v. Ross, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 21097 (3d Cir. Aug. 19, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA3: Incidental conversation during a traffic stop about def’s watch and job didn’t unreasonably extend the stop

S.D.Ga.: Nervousness and evasiveness about gun in open carry state was RS

While Georgia is an open carry state, defendant’s evasiveness about having a gun on him and overall nervousness was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Williams, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159777 (S.D. Ga. Aug. 18, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Nervousness and evasiveness about gun in open carry state was RS

SCOTUSBlog: The Trump administration puts ethnicity on the court’s emergency docket

SCOTUSBlog: The Trump administration puts ethnicity on the court’s emergency docket by César Cuauhtémoc García Hernandez (“Earlier this month, the Department of Justice filed an emergency request asking the Supreme Court to stay a temporary order from a district court blocking immigration agents in the Los Angeles metropolitan area from using an individual’s ‘apparent ethnicity,’ speaking Spanish or accented English, location, and occupation to determine who might be violating immigration law. To support its arguments in Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, the DOJ cites a half-century-old decision, United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, which permitted immigration agents to consider an individual’s ethnic appearance in law enforcement actions.”)

Posted in Immigration arrests, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: The Trump administration puts ethnicity on the court’s emergency docket

D.Mont.: Asking driver during traffic stop about probationary status not unreasonable

During this traffic stop, the officer asked defendant about his probationary status, and this did not unreasonably extend the stop. It relates to officer safety. United States v. Malloy, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159841 (D. Mont. Aug. 18, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Asking driver during traffic stop about probationary status not unreasonable

Reason: Do Cops Still Need a Warrant To Search Your Home in an ‘Emergency’?

Reason: Do Cops Still Need a Warrant To Search Your Home in an ‘Emergency’? by Damon Root (“SCOTUS will soon decide.”):

Continue reading
Posted in Emergency / exigency, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: Do Cops Still Need a Warrant To Search Your Home in an ‘Emergency’?

Latin Times: Arrest of Mexican Man in Hawaii Shows ICE is Using Remittance Data To Deport Migrants

Latin Times: Arrest of Mexican Man in Hawaii Shows ICE is Using Remittance Data To Deport Migrants by Pedro Camacho (“Critics argue that bulk collection of financial data without a warrant may violate the Fourth Amendment.”) But the third party doctrine? Expand please.

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Latin Times: Arrest of Mexican Man in Hawaii Shows ICE is Using Remittance Data To Deport Migrants

Bolts: New Orleans May Hand Its Police Live Facial Recognition Tech. Critics Warn It’ll Help ICE.

Bolts: New Orleans May Hand Its Police Live Facial Recognition Tech. Critics Warn It’ll Help ICE. by Piper French:

Continue reading
Posted in Facial recognition | Comments Off on Bolts: New Orleans May Hand Its Police Live Facial Recognition Tech. Critics Warn It’ll Help ICE.

Natl. Imm. Law Center: Warrants & Subpoenas: What to Look Out for and How to Respond

Natl. Imm. Law Center: Warrants & Subpoenas: What to Look Out for and How to Respond, fact sheet (Jan. 2025)

Posted in Immigration arrests, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on Natl. Imm. Law Center: Warrants & Subpoenas: What to Look Out for and How to Respond

CA10: Loud exhaust stop led to valid, albeit mixed motive, warrant arrest and inventory

Defendant’s loud exhaust led to his stop and then finding a warrant which led to his arrest and inventory which turned up fentanyl and a gun. “And although the officers decided to arrest Ulibarri for two reasons-properly for the bench warrants and improperly to search his car for evidence of a crime-the Fourth Amendment doesn’t prohibit these kinds of mixed motives.” United States v. Ulibarri, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20949 (10th Cir. Aug. 15, 2025). Update CaseMine: Community-Caretaking Revisited: United States v. Ulibarri Affirms Opperman Primacy and Validates Mixed-Motive Vehicle Impoundments : 10th Cir.

The officer did not unreasonably extend this stop. The officer here knew that the car wasn’t stolen, but the computer check didn’t readily confirm the car was an Enterprise rental. The drug dog arrived and the sniff occurred before the stop was completed. McGhee v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 6229 (Tex. App. – Dallas Aug. 15, 2025).*

Officers came to defendant’s house on a CI’s tip and evasive conduct at the door supplied more reasonable suspicion. United States v. Fuller, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158918 (E.D. Va. Aug. 15, 2025).*

Posted in Informant hearsay, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Loud exhaust stop led to valid, albeit mixed motive, warrant arrest and inventory

LATimes: Immigration agent fires shots at vehicle with people inside in San Bernardino operation

LATimes: Immigration agent fires shots at vehicle with people inside in San Bernardino operation by Brittny Mejia. The officers claim shooting at the vehicle was in self-defense:

Continue reading
Posted in Excessive force, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on LATimes: Immigration agent fires shots at vehicle with people inside in San Bernardino operation

CA11: Officers’ random drug stops on the jetbridge of departing passengers at ATL were unreasonable

Officers’ random drug stops on the jetbridge of departing passengers at ATL were unreasonable on the face of the pleadings. The officers get qualified immunity, but their employer does not. André v. Clayton County, Georgia, No. 23-13253 (11th Cir. Aug. 15, 2025). See Tampa Free Press: Appeals Court Sides With Comedians, Rules Against Police In Georgia Airport Stop Lawsuit. Remember DEA agent Markonni working ATL with the infamous “drug courier profile” in the 1980s that matched whatever facts he had at hand? [First off, last off; walking fast, walking slow; no luggage, too much luggage. There used to be CLEs just on his claims. Lexis and Westlaw showed the discrepancies of his claims.]

There was probable cause to search defendant’s car based on the cloud of smoke that came out of the window when he rolled down the window, then admitting to opioids in the car. State v. Olvarrieta, 2025 La. App. LEXIS 1492 (La. App. 4 Cir Aug. 8, 2025).*

“Although the Court finds that Deputy Fuston had reasonable suspicion that Ford and the passenger were hiding something, that level of suspicion was not required in order for him to order Ford to exit the vehicle. An officer may always order a driver to exit his vehicle during a lawful traffic stop. See Pennsylvania v. Mimms, …” United States v. Ford, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154803 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2025).*

Posted in Airport searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Officers’ random drug stops on the jetbridge of departing passengers at ATL were unreasonable

RawStory: ‘Horrible!’ Trump accused of using immigrants as guinea pigs for terrifying tech trial

RawStory: ‘Horrible!’ Trump accused of using immigrants as guinea pigs for terrifying tech trial by Matt Lasso:

Continue reading
Posted in DNA, Facial recognition, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on RawStory: ‘Horrible!’ Trump accused of using immigrants as guinea pigs for terrifying tech trial

D.P.R.: Franks: “defendants must do more than construct self-serving statements that refute the warrant affidavit”

United States v. Ruiz-Ruiz, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158695 (D.P.R. Aug. 14, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Franks: “defendants must do more than construct self-serving statements that refute the warrant affidavit”

Reason: Automated License Plate Readers Are Watching You

Reason: Automated License Plate Readers Are Watching You by Jacob Sullum (“The technology enables routine surveillance that would have troubled the Fourth Amendment’s framers.”)

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on Reason: Automated License Plate Readers Are Watching You

VA: Dog repeatedly jumping onto the vehicle during the dog sniff was a search

The drug-sniffing dog’s repeatedly jumping onto and placing paws on a vehicle during a drug sniff constitutes a physical trespass for the purpose of obtaining information, and therefore qualifies as a search under the Fourth Amendment. Commonwealth v. Wiggins, 2025 Va. App. LEXIS 464 (Aug. 12, 2025) (unpublished).

Habeas petitioner’s Fourth Amendment claim can’t be reviewed in a 2255. Wood v. Warden, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20417 (6th Cir. Aug. 11, 2025).*

“We likewise agree with the District Court that the circumstances here support the officers’ reasonable suspicion that Brown was engaged in criminal activity. First, the remote lot where Brown was driven to was well known for criminal activity, with one officer testifying that it was ‘an area involved in high crime’ and ‘a haven for illegal activity, especially, regarding drugs and stolen property.’ … Second, the officers were already at the scene to investigate stolen property. Third, the officers had already arrested another individual who had an active warrant out for his arrest. Fourth, Brown, unprovoked, ran into a wooded area despite the cool temperatures and rainfall so heavy that the vehicle became stuck in the mud.” United States v. Brown, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20388 (3d Cir. Aug. 12, 2025).*

Posted in Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Search, Trespass | Comments Off on VA: Dog repeatedly jumping onto the vehicle during the dog sniff was a search

MS: The CIs were co-conspirators and eyewitnesses and could be credited

The three informants were co-conspirators, eyewitnesses, and participants in the crime, and their information could be credited for search warrant. Taylor v. State, 2025 Miss. App. LEXIS 292 (Aug. 12, 2025).

Defendant’s 2255 re-raises his Fourth Amendment claim already rejected. Law of the case. United States v. Pea, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156071 (W.D. La. Aug. 11, 2025).*

The court credited the officer over the basis for the stop, even though it wasn’t mentioned on the bodycam. United States v. Kitchen, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20501 (8th Cir. Aug. 13, 2025).*

Plaintiff was being arrested for murder, and the force used wasn’t unreasonably excessive. It was reasonable to consider him a threat. Roe v. Fryer, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20494 (11th Cir. Aug. 13, 2025).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: The CIs were co-conspirators and eyewitnesses and could be credited

Reason: Warrantless Use of License Plate Reader Cameras Is Unconstitutional

Reason: Warrantless Use of License Plate Reader Cameras Is Unconstitutional by Joe Lancaster (“A new campaign pushes back against the widespread use of automatic license plate readers without warrants.”)

{Not likely.}

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on Reason: Warrantless Use of License Plate Reader Cameras Is Unconstitutional

CA2: Subsequent officer’s entry into protective sweep wasn’t unreasonable; it was considered part of the first

The protective sweep of defendant’s garage which led to an observation that made it into the warrant application was reasonable. A later entry into the garage by another officer wasn’t unreasonable. It mimicked the first. United States v. Constantinescu, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20686 (2d Cir. Aug. 14, 2025).

The state showed probable cause for defendant’s CSLI. State v. Evans, 2025 Conn. LEXIS 177 (Aug. 12, 2025).*

The 4-5 minute protective sweep was reasonable and justified by the facts. United States v. Francisco-Tomas, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156257 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 13, 2025).*

A game warden stopped defendant’s vehicle for suspicion of littering, and the smell of marijuana justified more. The FSTs, however, weren’t authorized by a game warden, so that part is suppressed. State v. Phelan, 2025 Wisc. App. LEXIS 735 (Aug. 14, 2025).*

Posted in Cell site location information, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Subsequent officer’s entry into protective sweep wasn’t unreasonable; it was considered part of the first

MN: Mere propinquity to armed person not RS

Frisk of appellant for merely being near an armed person was without reasonable suspicion. In re C.T.B., 2025 Minn. LEXIS 392 (Aug. 13, 2025).

There was arguable probable cause for defendant’s arrest. The claim that evidence was fabricated fails. “But a claim based on the alleged fabrication of evidence poses a ‘high bar to clear’: Mack must prove not only that Clausell’s identification as described in the officers’ reports was false, but also that the officers ‘manufactured’ it.” Mack v. City of Chi., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20594 (7th Cir. Aug. 13, 2025).*

Whether the officer touching the windshield as he peered through it for a plain view was a Fourth Amendment trespass wasn’t clearly presented below so it’s not appealable. United States v. Martinez, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20788 (10th Cir. Aug. 13, 2025).*

Defendant didn’t get seized until he was captured after he fled to avoid a possible frisk. United States v. Taylor, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157794 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2025).*

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Trespass, Waiver | Comments Off on MN: Mere propinquity to armed person not RS

CA5: Officer’s resting hand on truck while talking to def wasn’t a seizure

The officer resting his hand on defendant’s truck while talking to him during a stop was not a separate seizure of him. United States v. Larremore, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20757 (5th Cir. Aug. 14, 2025).

The closest case plaintiff has was decided two years after these events, so that doesn’t put the officers on notice. Smith v. Saenz, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20756 (5th Cir. Aug. 14, 2025).*

The trial court didn’t properly consider all the suppression issues, so the case is remanded for a further hearing. People v. Hughes, 2025 Mich. App. LEXIS 6558 (Aug. 13, 2025).*

Collective knowledge justified this traffic stop, and reasonable suspicion developed thereafter. United States v. Godbersen, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157249 (N.D. Iowa Aug. 14, 2025).*

Posted in Collective knowledge, Qualified immunity, Seizure, Standards of review, Trespass | Comments Off on CA5: Officer’s resting hand on truck while talking to def wasn’t a seizure