D.P.R.: Franks: “defendants must do more than construct self-serving statements that refute the warrant affidavit”

United States v. Ruiz-Ruiz, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158695 (D.P.R. Aug. 14, 2025):

Furthermore, to overcome the presumptive validity of an application supporting a search warrant, defendants must do more than construct self-serving statements that refute the warrant affidavit. United States v. Andujar-Ortiz, 575 F.Supp. 2d 373, 377 (D.P.R. 2008) (finding that “a Defendant’s self[-]serving statement is not a sufficient offer of proof”); see United States v. McDonald, 723 F.2d 1288, 1294 (7th Cir. 1983). “[F]lat denials of allegations … fall short of the ‘substantial preliminary showing’ required to justify a Franks hearing because this only ‘set[s] up a swearing contest.'” United States v. Pérez-Greaux, 83 F.4th 1, 33 (1st Cir. 2023) (citation omitted). Thus, a “flat denial alone ‘do[es] not demonstrate a substantial possibility of affiant perjury.'” Id. (citation omitted); see also United States v. Southard, 700 F.2d 1, 10 (1st Cir. 1983) (holding bare denials of facts stated in law enforcement affidavits “do not demonstrate a substantial possibility of affiant perjury” and thus fail to help defendants meet a “substantial preliminary showing” of falsehood).

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.