CA11: Officers’ random drug stops on the jetbridge of departing passengers at ATL were unreasonable

Officers’ random drug stops on the jetbridge of departing passengers at ATL were unreasonable on the face of the pleadings. The officers get qualified immunity, but their employer does not. André v. Clayton County, Georgia, No. 23-13253 (11th Cir. Aug. 15, 2025). See Tampa Free Press: Appeals Court Sides With Comedians, Rules Against Police In Georgia Airport Stop Lawsuit. Remember DEA agent Markonni working ATL with the infamous “drug courier profile” in the 1980s that matched whatever facts he had at hand? [First off, last off; walking fast, walking slow; no luggage, too much luggage. There used to be CLEs just on his claims. Lexis and Westlaw showed the discrepancies of his claims.]

There was probable cause to search defendant’s car based on the cloud of smoke that came out of the window when he rolled down the window, then admitting to opioids in the car. State v. Olvarrieta, 2025 La. App. LEXIS 1492 (La. App. 4 Cir Aug. 8, 2025).*

“Although the Court finds that Deputy Fuston had reasonable suspicion that Ford and the passenger were hiding something, that level of suspicion was not required in order for him to order Ford to exit the vehicle. An officer may always order a driver to exit his vehicle during a lawful traffic stop. See Pennsylvania v. Mimms, …” United States v. Ford, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154803 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Airport searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.