S.D.Ga.: Nervousness and evasiveness about gun in open carry state was RS

While Georgia is an open carry state, defendant’s evasiveness about having a gun on him and overall nervousness was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Williams, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159777 (S.D. Ga. Aug. 18, 2025):

Defendant argues that officers did not have a reasonable suspicion that Defendant was both armed and dangerous, as required for a valid Terry frisk. Doc. 37-1. Defendant argues that nervous behavior “does not automatically provide officers with reasonable suspicion.” Id. at 5. Further, Defendant argues that, because Georgia is an open carry state, the fact that he possessed a firearm “without more” also did not create reasonable suspicion. Id. Defendant explains that there were multiple officers on the scene and he sat quietly in the vehicle. Defendant also argues that his nervousness was due to officers “shouting at Defendant, forcefully poking him in the head, and telling him he did not have rights.” Id. at 6.

In response, the Government argues that the Terry frisk was lawful. Doc. 40. The Government contends that the following facts support officers’ reasonable suspicion to conduct a frisk. Officers observed Defendant in an area known for crime, observed Defendant smoking marijuana, detected the odor of marijuana, and observed Defendant to be nervous and sweating. Officers also observed Defendant “shoving” an object down his waistband. Officers noted that Defendant gave evasive answers when asked whether he possessed a firearm. Id. at 7-8.

Having considered the entire record, I conclude that the officers had reasonable suspicion to believe Defendant was armed and dangerous. Therefore, the Terry frisk was lawful and evidence obtained during the stop and statement made during the subsequent custodial interview should not be suppressed. …

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.