NY Times: He Says He Stabbed a Student to Defend His Home. His Home Is a Box.

NY Times: He Says He Stabbed a Student to Defend His Home. His Home Is a Box. By Nikita Stewart and Jan Ransom (“A homeless man is fighting his case by invoking New York’s “castle doctrine,” which gives people the right to defend their dwellings.”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NY Times: He Says He Stabbed a Student to Defend His Home. His Home Is a Box.

injusticewatch.org: Illinois Supreme Court to decide whether smell of pot is grounds to search a car

injusticewatch.org: Illinois Supreme Court to decide whether smell of pot is grounds to search a car by John Seasly (“With marijuana now legal in Illinois, the state high court heard arguments Tuesday on whether the smell of marijuana grants police the right to conduct warrantless vehicle searches.”)

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on injusticewatch.org: Illinois Supreme Court to decide whether smell of pot is grounds to search a car

NYTimes: Apple Takes a (Cautious) Stand Against Opening a Killer’s iPhones

NYTimes: Apple Takes a (Cautious) Stand Against Opening a Killer’s iPhones By Jack Nicas and Katie Benner (“The Silicon Valley giant is preparing for a legal fight over encryption, even as it works to reduce tensions with the Justice Department.”)

Posted in Digital privacy, Privileges | Comments Off on NYTimes: Apple Takes a (Cautious) Stand Against Opening a Killer’s iPhones

techdirt: DHS Move Ahead With Plan To Harvest DNA Samples From Nearly Everyone Detained By ICE And CBP Privacy

techdirt: DHS Move Ahead With Plan To Harvest DNA Samples From Nearly Everyone Detained By ICE And CBPPrivacy by Tim Cushing:
Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on techdirt: DHS Move Ahead With Plan To Harvest DNA Samples From Nearly Everyone Detained By ICE And CBP Privacy

W.D.Ky.: Asking questions while writing out a warning ticket do not measurably extend a stop

Asking questions while writing out a warning ticket do not measurably extend a stop. United States v. Green, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4421 (W.D. Ky. Jan. 10, 2020).

Defendant’s arrest was valid, so his statement wasn’t fruit of the poisonous tree. United States v. Thomas, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 836 (3d Cir. Jan. 10, 2020).*

The CI’s statement was sufficiently corroborated to provide probable cause, and the affidavit provides detailed information from the CI’s first hand knowledge. United States v. Malone, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4420 (W.D. Ky. Jan. 10, 2020).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Asking questions while writing out a warning ticket do not measurably extend a stop

CA3: Nondisclosure order of GJ subpoena and later SW under SCA was reasonable based on GJ secrecy

A court order to not disclose the existence of a grand jury subpoena for records under the Stored Communications Act led to a search warrant for additional data. The order to not disclose is based on grand jury secrecy, and it survives strict scrutiny under the First Amendment. In re Application of Subpoena 2018R00776, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 842 (3d Cir. Jan. 10, 2020):
Continue reading →

Posted in Gag orders, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA3: Nondisclosure order of GJ subpoena and later SW under SCA was reasonable based on GJ secrecy

DE: Question about “Anything illegal in the car: Human beings, guns, drugs, dead bodies in the trunk” wasn’t unreasonable and didn’t measurably extend the stop.

Officer’s routine question about “Anything illegal in the car: Human beings, guns, drugs, dead bodies in the trunk” wasn’t unreasonable and didn’t measurably extend the stop. State v. Medina, 2020 Del. Super. LEXIS 18 (Jan. 7, 2020):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on DE: Question about “Anything illegal in the car: Human beings, guns, drugs, dead bodies in the trunk” wasn’t unreasonable and didn’t measurably extend the stop.

NYTimes: How the Police Use Facial Recognition, and Where It Falls Short

NYTimes: How the Police Use Facial Recognition, and Where It Falls Short by Jennifer Valentino-DeVries (“Records from Florida, where law enforcement has long used the controversial technology, offer an inside look at its risks and rewards.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: How the Police Use Facial Recognition, and Where It Falls Short

Law360: Lawmakers Push To Extend Atty-Client Shield To Prison Emails

Law360: Lawmakers Push To Extend Atty-Client Shield To Prison Emails by RJ Vogt:
Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on Law360: Lawmakers Push To Extend Atty-Client Shield To Prison Emails

N.D.Ohio: Ongoing drug operation overcame staleness challenge

The 71-page affidavit for search warrant here did not go stale before issuance. There was plenty of information about an ongoing drug operation. Between then and when the officers decided to get a search warrant, the original information hadn’t gone stale. The nature of the drug operation was ongoing and logically still would be. “[W]hy should law enforcement (or anyone else for that matter) think the subject matter radically changed to innocent family banter a couple of months later?” Nexus was also shown. United States v. Dawson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224421 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 20, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Ongoing drug operation overcame staleness challenge

E.D.Pa.: Furtive movements and excessive nervousness when stopped was RS

Defendant’s furtive movements while driving and nervousness after the stop justified extending the stop for fear there might be a weapon. United States v. Miller, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224424 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 4, 2019).*

The odor of alcohol, fumbling with paperwork, and failing the FST was reasonable suspicion to extend the stop and then probable cause for arrest. State v. Murray, 2020-Ohio-45, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 38 (2d Dist. Jan. 10, 2020).*

Reversed again for lack of a hearing and findings of fact and conclusions of law. The court remanded once, Peterson v. State, 249 So. 3d 1264, 1264-65 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018), and it does so again. Peterson v. State, 2020 Fla. App. LEXIS 249 (Fla. 5th DCA Jan. 10, 2020).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Furtive movements and excessive nervousness when stopped was RS

CA8: Unauthorized driver of a rental car, a person close to the renter, wasn’t strawman and had standing

Defendant was in a rental car but wasn’t an authorized driver. Nothing suggests a strawman situation, and defendant and the renter had a longstanding relationship. The court finds standing and refuses to entertain overruling prior authority because it isn’t inconsistent with Byrd. On the merits, however, the court affirmed the stop and searches were justified. United States v. Bettis, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 746 (8th Cir. Jan. 10, 2020).

Defendant’s cell phone search argument depended upon his statements being suppressed. But they weren’t and that was affirmed on appeal. United States v. Leyva, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 787 (6th Cir. Jan. 9, 2020).*

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Unauthorized driver of a rental car, a person close to the renter, wasn’t strawman and had standing

KS: Def’s actions after the police entry and signing the consent form clearly show voluntariness

“We note, however, that Daino’s acts after the officers entered his residence confirm, instead of refute, his intent to consent to their entry. Daino never protested the officers’ presence. Instead, he later opened a safe for the officers, agreed officers could search his bedroom, showed officers where the drugs were hidden, then signed a voluntary consent to search form that the officer had reviewed with him. That form states: … [it was comprehensive].” State v. Daino, 2020 Kan. App. LEXIS 4 (Jan. 10, 2020).

A shots fired call led police to a high crime area, and reasonable suspicion justified the stop of defendant and two others on the street. A shirtless mail in black pants was described. Two were shirtless, and defendant had on blue jeans. When the man in black was frisked, there was no weapon. It was reasonable then to frisk defendant. United States v. Mayfield, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224325 (D. Neb. Dec. 12, 2019).*

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: Def’s actions after the police entry and signing the consent form clearly show voluntariness

CA7: Handcuffing winded obese man behind his back led to death because of unknown heart condition; not excessive force

Plaintiff’s decedent was in a foot chase with officers after a shoplifting incident. He was winded, obese, and, unknown to officers, had a heart condition. He was handcuffed behind his back and died from lack of oxygen in his blood. The officers get qualified immunity because no case says that these circumstances lead to an excessive force claim. Day v. Wooten, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 825 (7th Cir. Jan. 10, 2020).

Denial of qualified immunity for excessive force can’t be appealed when there’s disputed questions of fact for trial. Adams v. Blount Cty., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 574 (6th Cir. Jan. 7, 2020).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Handcuffing winded obese man behind his back led to death because of unknown heart condition; not excessive force

D.Me.: State bail condition that def submit to searches permitted this search

Defendant’s state court bail condition included that he submit to reasonable searches of his person and place at anytime. There’s no showing that he didn’t understand the condition. United States v. Kissh, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3767 (D. Me. Jan. 7, 2020). [This is just wrong and cannot be supported by implied or contractual consent. It’s coercion in the same order as a probation or parole search, which is permitted because probation and parole have the accused under supervision and they have been found guilty. Nothing in the Fourth Amendment justifies this, including forced implied consent. The court went with consent, not special needs.]

Under Texas’s jury exclusionary rule statute, Article 38.23(a), defense counsel didn’t object to the instruction given which might have been erroneous. Under their standard of review, assuming it was error, the defense can’t show “egregious error.” Hernandez v. State, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 203 (Tex. App. – Eastland Jan. 9, 2020).*

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Me.: State bail condition that def submit to searches permitted this search

WaPo: You need a good reason to curb privacy. None exists for collecting DNA at the border.

WaPo: Editorial Board: You need a good reason to curb privacy. None exists for collecting DNA at the border.

NEWS THIS MONTH that the U.S. government would start collecting DNA from people detained at the border seemed to sketch out a picture of dystopia: citizens, green-card holders and immigrants, including asylum-seekers, all required to hand over their most intimate identifying information to be shipped off to a massive FBI-run criminal database. The reality isn’t quite so dire, but it’s still far from rosy.

Posted in Body searches, DNA | Comments Off on WaPo: You need a good reason to curb privacy. None exists for collecting DNA at the border.

D.Nev.: Def’s motion to join codef’s motion to suppress requires showing of REP in joinder motion

Defendant’s motion to join a codefendant’s motion to suppress requires a showing of his reasonable expectation of privacy in the joinder motion. United States v. Palafox, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3698 (D. Nev. Jan. 7, 2020).

“[T]he affidavit includes facts supporting probable cause that evidence of a crime would be found in the residence. The confidential source accounts, homicide investigation, and police surveillance detailed above and in the affidavit suggest that, in order to purchase methamphetamine from Danny Burks, customers would knock on the garage door and then, if unsuccessful, proceed to the front door.” Other drug buyers had been seen there for that purpose, too. United States v. Butler, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224486 (D. Nev. Nov. 20, 2019),* adopted 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3198 (D.Nev. Jan. 8, 2020).*

Posted in Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Def’s motion to join codef’s motion to suppress requires showing of REP in joinder motion

D.N.M.: Govt fails in burden of showing consent. Was “yes” acknowledgement of statement to def or assent to search?

The government fails in its burden to show consent to a patdown of defendant’s person. There was a language barrier, and previous questions and statements were translated, but this one wasn’t. “Even though that defendant said ‘yes’ in response to SA Perry’s request, the court interpreted the word ‘yes’ ‘as an acknowledgment that Perry had spoken to her, rather than consent to submit to a search…’ 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201450, [WL] at *8.” United States v. Garcia-Guzman, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3731 (D. N.M. Jan. 7, 2020).*

The government showed reasonable suspicion for a cell phone search at the border based on what else was on her and her travels in a rental car and suspicion she was running firearms. United States v. Haynes, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3426 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 9, 2020).*

Posted in Border search, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Govt fails in burden of showing consent. Was “yes” acknowledgement of statement to def or assent to search?

S.D.Ohio: Lack of factual basis for stop deprives state of Heien mistake of law argument

The video from the patrol car doesn’t support the officer’s claim that defendant didn’t properly stop at a stop sign that that was the basis for the stop. The court doesn’t find Heien applies because this isn’t a mistake of law. United States v. Britton, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3465 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 9, 2020).

Plaintiff prison inmate’s strip search was not clearly unconstitutional and had an apparent penological interest. The case was properly dismissed. Peoples v. Baker, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 637 (10th Cir. Jan. 9, 2020).*

2255 petitioner claims defense counsel was ineffective for not raising an issue that actually was raised, lost, appealed, and affirmed. Denied. Covarrubias v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3457 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 9, 2020).*

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Lack of factual basis for stop deprives state of Heien mistake of law argument

OH8: When police at door ask to come in and the occupant stands back and aside, that implies permission and consent

When defendant opened the door and police were there and asked for admission, stepping back and aside implied consent to enter. Police then did a proper protective sweep of the room. City of Westlake v. Dudas, 2020-Ohio-31, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 28 (8th Dist. Jan. 8, 2020).

The district court’s finding of voluntary consent to search is not clearly erroneous, despite the apparent language barrier between the officers and the defendant. “Construing all facts in the light most favorable to the party prevailing below, we conclude that the district court could have reasonably concluded that Rodriguez Perez consented to the search. First, Detective Arriola’s testimony that he sought, and received permission from, Rodriguez Perez while he was detained was not contradicted at the suppression hearing or at trial. Second, we reject Rodriguez Perez’s argument that his consent was not voluntary based on a totality of the circumstances. Here, we find two of our past cases-Espinosa-Orlando and Garcia-instructive.” United States v. Perez, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 600 (11th Cir. Jan. 9, 2020).*

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on OH8: When police at door ask to come in and the occupant stands back and aside, that implies permission and consent