N.D.Cal.: Failure to produce SW at scene of search doesn’t violate Rule 41 or 4A

Failure to produce a search warrant at the time of the search doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment or Rule 41. Also, the search was particular. “In our case, a San Francisco Superior Court issued the search warrant, which federal ATF agents and San Francisco police department officers executed. Mr. Jah and his adult son and daughter witnessed the search, during which police seized a firearm, ammunition, and electronic devices. Mr. Jah protests that officers failed to produce the warrant during or after the search, despite his and his daughters’ requests (Dkt No. 203). This alleged failure did not cause discovery or seizure of the gun or electronics. Whether the warrant was provided or not provided, the search itself (pursuant to the warrant) would have unfolded in exactly the same way.” United States v. Jah, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 242913 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 26, 2020).

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Failure to produce SW at scene of search doesn’t violate Rule 41 or 4A

IL: Conversation with passenger while waiting for transport for arrested driver didn’t extend the stop

Defendant was a passenger in a car stopped for a seat belt violation. The driver had no DL and he was handcuffed. While waiting for transport of the driver, the arresting officer engaged him in conversation. This was reasonable and didn’t prolong the stop. People v. Sutton, 2020 IL App (1st) 181616, 2020 Ill. App. LEXIS 889 (Dec. 22, 2020).

“None of the facts that Simonson identified undermine the existence of probable cause. That Loretta did not report the incident for five days and initially denied that anything occurred does not detract from what the officers saw or their actions based on the details she provided. Because probable cause existed to arrest Simonson for aggravated assault, he cannot establish that he was unlawfully seized, maliciously prosecuted, or falsely arrested and imprisoned. Accordingly, he cannot show that Roche’s conduct violated the Fourth Amendment, and the District Court thus properly dismissed the § 1983 claim against him.” Simonson v. Borough of Taylor, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 40406 (3d Cir. Dec. 28, 2020).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Conversation with passenger while waiting for transport for arrested driver didn’t extend the stop

Vox: The real cost of smart speakers

Vox: The real cost of smart speakers by Sam Ellis (“But essentially, smart speakers are microphones that connect to the internet. And they come with a hidden cost: some of our privacy. After listening to our questions and demands, these devices send recordings to servers where they can be stored indefinitely. But what do these tech companies do with the recordings?”)

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Vox: The real cost of smart speakers

W.D.Tenn.: Merely being in a friend’s house in one’s underwear during an early morning search isn’t standing

A nonresident defendant found in his underwear at the scene of house search didn’t show guest standing. That alone wasn’t enough. Probably if he brought a toothbrush. United States v. Davenport, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 242449 (W.D. Tenn. Dec. 28, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Merely being in a friend’s house in one’s underwear during an early morning search isn’t standing

OH12: RS for stop after drugs found in 70 other traffic stops leaving suspected drug house

Suppose just for the sake of argument a law enforcement officer conducts 70 potentially legal stops of cars leaving a drug house but then finds drugs in the car. Assume further there was no reasonable suspicion for a detention or probable cause for a search. Suppose further the officer finds drugs nearly 100% of the time. Few of them are arrested to keep the investigation on the down low. Then the officer gets a search warrant for the house they were all leaving based on all the drugs coming out of there. Does the target of the search in the house have standing for a motion to suppress on how the probable cause was developed? Almost certainly not, and see § 4.17 on target standing. But would a potential Rochin due process “shocking to the conscience” claim be viable? Probably not, because the target wasn’t the victim of the conscious shocking police work. This might be suggested by State v. Hinkston, 2020-Ohio-6903, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4720 (12th Dist. Dec. 28, 2020), although these aren’t the facts. There,

Continue reading →
Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH12: RS for stop after drugs found in 70 other traffic stops leaving suspected drug house

UT: PC can dissipate over time; just because they had it once doesn’t mean they always will

The trial court refused to bind over defendant for trial on arson charges. The state investigated (but not completely apparently) and never sought a search warrant for evidence at the scene while they found it suspicious. The fact there might have been probable cause on the day of the fire, the passage of time and learning new facts could result in dissipation of probable cause. The magistrate did not abuse his discretion in refusing to bind the case over. State v. Prisbrey, 2020 UT App 172, 2020 Utah App. LEXIS 173 (Dec. 24, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on UT: PC can dissipate over time; just because they had it once doesn’t mean they always will

D.Utah: Govt had burden on proving RS to continue stop and failed to put on justification; suppressed

The government carried the burden on the basis for the stop but not why it was continued, and the record tells the court nothing about the first 65 minutes of delay. “[T]he court concludes that the dog’s entry into the car constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment and, therefore, must have been supported by probable cause.” Also, defendant’s statements are fruit of the poisonous tree. United States v. Pena-Armenta, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 242184 (D. Utah Dec. 23, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Utah: Govt had burden on proving RS to continue stop and failed to put on justification; suppressed

CA11: Obscured LPN justified stop, even if statute was unconstitutionally vague

Defendant’s obscured LPN gave probable cause for the stop, even if the statute were to later prove to be unconstitutionally vague. The latter question is not decided. United States v. Sanchez, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 40243 (11th Cir. Dec. 23, 2020).

Petitioner claims defense counsel was ineffective for not seeking to suppress his search. But he did (three times) and lost. Ivory v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 241355 (N.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2020).*

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA11: Obscured LPN justified stop, even if statute was unconstitutionally vague

IL: A stop and a frisk require independent factual bases

Stop and frisk are separate questions in their justification and scope, citing Terry. People v. Baker, 2020 IL App (2d) 180300, 2020 Ill. App. LEXIS 880 (Dec. 22, 2020).

Police came for a wellness check on defendant’s mother. The search warrant was based on two prior entries. The first was on exigency to investigate a noxious odor they could smell outside the home. The second was consented to by her brother, a cotenant with her. People v. Grant, 2020 NY Slip Op 07914, 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7956 (2d Dept. Dec. 23, 2020).*

Posted in Community caretaking function, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: A stop and a frisk require independent factual bases

CA8: Pulling a gun on officers in pursuit justified deadly force

Plaintiff’s decedent’s vehicle was stopped as part of a pseudoephedrine buying investigation. A shotgun was admitted to being in the truck, and decedent repeatedly reached to his waist. Officers got him out, but, as soon as he hit the ground, he struggled and broke away and ran. He was stopped by the police dog but pulled a gun, and pointed it toward officers. “Here, Garringer and Jones reasonably believed Gossman posed a serious threat to their safety and that deadly force was justified. When Bane caught him, Gossman drew a handgun. That drawn handgun ‘pose[d] a threat of serious physical harm’ to the officers and justified their use of deadly force against Gossman.” It matters not that one of the officers erroneously thought decedent fired his gun. McElree v. City of Cedar Rapids, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 40217 (8th Cir. Dec. 23, 2020).*

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA8: Pulling a gun on officers in pursuit justified deadly force

OH6: CI was identified and admitted his culpability and that bolstered PC

“The fact that Chad was an identified informant and that his statements acted as an admission of his own criminal activity bolstered his credibility. This when viewed collectively with the other three instances of drug activity set forth in the affidavit, provides a sufficient basis to support the issuance of a search warrant.” Even if it didn’t provide probable cause, the good faith exception would apply. State v. Connin, 2020-Ohio-6867, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4706 (6th Dist. Dec. 23, 2020).

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails for lack of intentional false statement and materiality. United States v. Houdersheldt, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 241736 (S.D. W.Va. Dec. 23, 2020).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OH6: CI was identified and admitted his culpability and that bolstered PC

W.D.Ky.: Corroboration of CI’s unique details supported CI’s reliability

“Here, the corroboration of unique details about where and how Daniels conducted drug transactions buttresses CS #2’s tip. The investigative measures taken by Detective Troutman make it probable that the informant was being truthful and gained his knowledge through access to reliable information, whether it be from firsthand experience or from elsewhere. This helps make up for any deficiency in the statement about CS #2’s reliability included in the affidavit.” United States v. Daniels, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 240687 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 22, 2020).

Defendant’s challenge to his tracking warrant was waived when it first was raised in his objections to the R&R. United States v. Pickens, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 240703 (D. Minn. Dec. 22, 2020).*

Posted in Informant hearsay, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Corroboration of CI’s unique details supported CI’s reliability

N.Y.Co.: Warrant to seize DNA includes state’s ability to test

When a warrant is obtained to get evidence, here DNA, a separate warrant isn’t required to test it. People v. Belliard, 2020 NY Slip Op 20346, 2020 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 10747 (N.Y. Co. Dec. 22, 2020).

“The totality of the circumstances outlined in the warrant point to a fair probability that the Defendant drove under the influence of alcohol. Corporal Duffy stated in her affidavit that when she arrived at the scene of this two-vehicle accident she observed a pickup that belonged to the Defendant. In and around that pick up were bottles of alcohol and beer. When questioned, Mr. Binkley admitted to drinking earlier in the day at around 3 p.m. This fact was confirmed by a passenger in Binkley’s car. Corporal Duffy observed that the Defendant’s eyes were glassy and that there was an odor of alcohol about the defendant.” State v. Binkley, 2020 Del. Super. LEXIS 3014 (Dec. 21, 2020).*

Posted in DNA, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.Y.Co.: Warrant to seize DNA includes state’s ability to test

OH2: Post-conviction 4A claim of lack of PC for SW fails for failure to include affidavit in record

Defendant’s post-conviction claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging the validity of the search warrant in his case fails. He has to show he would have prevailed on the search issue, but the affidavit for the warrant isn’t part of the record so it’s waived. State v. Lawson, 2020-Ohio-6852, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4689 (2d Dist. Dec. 23, 2020).

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective in how he pursued a motion to suppress and lost [it wasn’t remotely a winner]. Wilson v. State, 2020 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 806 (Dec. 22, 2020).*

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance, Waiver | Comments Off on OH2: Post-conviction 4A claim of lack of PC for SW fails for failure to include affidavit in record

CAAF: Not all details of alleged offense need to be included in request for search authorization

The military trial judge erred in concluding that the search authorization required AFOSI complete information to determine probable cause for defendant’s DNA in a sex assault case. It’s not. Just because there were differing versions of how dressed the victim was when she woke up doesn’t make the authorization without probable cause. After the first DNA search was [erroneously] suppressed, the independent source doctrine permitted a second search authorization with more information backing it up. United States v. Garcia, 2020 CAAF LEXIS 706 (C.A.A.F. Dec. 9, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Franks doctrine, Military searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on CAAF: Not all details of alleged offense need to be included in request for search authorization

D.Neb.: Knights eliminated stalking horse theory of police using POs to conduct searches

Knights eliminated the stalking horse theory of police using POs to conduct searches because they can, too. United States v. Brun, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 239791 (D. Neb. Dec. 21, 2020).

There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop from a call to a police administrative line, not 911. It was on a recorded line, and that enhanced its reliability. Kinnett v. State, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 10140 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) Dec. 22, 2020).

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Knights eliminated stalking horse theory of police using POs to conduct searches

CA11: Record supports third-party consent argued but not decided below

Defendant operated through a corporate website running a gold bullion scam where money was received and no gold delivered. Another corporate employee with administrative privileges received complaints and looked in the non-public parts of the website to print evidence for federal investigators. The district court decided it on lack of standing. The court of appeals instead decides on third-party consent. “Courts have likewise concluded that an employer having administrative access to an employee’s computer could validly consent to a search of the computer, even when the computer is password-protected and contains non-work-related, personal files of the employee. United States v. Ziegler, 474 F.3d 1184, 1192 (9th Cir. 2007).” While consent wasn’t decided below, it was the focus of the hearing, and the record made supports this result under this alternate theory. “Both our Court and the Supreme Court have issued decisions that, while not totally on point, make clear that an organization’s status as the legal owner of the premises searched or information obtained is not the dispositive factor as to whether an individual affiliated with that company or organization, and the objects searched, might not also enjoy Fourth Amendment protection in connection with the search.” United States v. Waddell, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 40248 (11th Cir. Dec. 23, 2020).

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on CA11: Record supports third-party consent argued but not decided below

TX3: No “sua sponte duty” in trial court to suppress evidence that the defense didn’t move to suppress

The trial court has no “sua sponte duty” to suppress evidence that the defense didn’t move to suppress. Chila v. State, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 10219 (Tex. App. – Austin Dec. 23, 2020).

Police along with USMs entered defendant’s place with an arrest warrant. They did a protective sweep and then obtained a search warrant. The sweep was valid. No search occurred until the warrant was signed. State v. Fisher, 2020 La. App. LEXIS 1880 (La. App. 5 Cir. Dec. 23, 2020).* To the same effect, but without USMs is State v. Lane, 2020 La. App. LEXIS 1884 (La. App. 5 Cir. Dec. 23, 2020).*

The uncontested search warrant in this case was for clothing to match defendant to a store security video. State v. Dastrup, 2020 N.H. LEXIS 217 (Nov. 16, 2020).*

Posted in Motion to suppress, Protective sweep, Scope of search | Comments Off on TX3: No “sua sponte duty” in trial court to suppress evidence that the defense didn’t move to suppress

OH7: Police going to def’s back window and video recording him in house violated curtilage

A police officer coming to the back of defendant’s house to look in the window and video him with a cell phone violated curtilage and his reasonable expectation of privacy. State v. Desarro, 2020-Ohio-6815, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4661 (7th Dist. Dec. 16, 2020).

India seeks extradition for murder, and the papers show probable cause to believe defendant was involved. United States v. Rana, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 240386 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2020).*

Posted in Curtilage, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH7: Police going to def’s back window and video recording him in house violated curtilage

N.D.Ga.: Two decades of drug activity in SW for cell phone wasn’t stale because of recent information

A two decade long drug investigation into defendant didn’t rely solely on stale information to obtain a search warrant for her cell phone. “The affidavit established that she was involved in a prolonged criminal activity, that she used electronic media to communicate with gang members, and that she wanted a new phone number after her arrest to continue communicating with gang members. It also alleged that those involved in drug trafficking conspiracies often use cell phones to communicate (describing phones as ‘vital instruments’ of drug trafficking) and that such devices store information for long periods of time. … Based on all of this, the Magistrate Judge concluded the warrant information was not stale and that it established probable cause for the search of Defendant Rau’s phone.” United States v. Rau, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 239415 (N.D. Ga. Dec. 21, 2020).*

Posted in Cell phones, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Two decades of drug activity in SW for cell phone wasn’t stale because of recent information