CA8 refuses to extend Bivens to case on false arrest on false evidence

Congress has to determine the scope of Bivens, and the court declines to extend it to a false arrest case involving a “rogue officer” alleged to have fabricated evidence in sex crime prosecutions. “This appeal is another chapter in the aftermath of an investigation into an alleged interstate sex-trafficking scheme that was plagued with problems from the start. Of the thirty people who were indicted, United States v. Adan, 913 F. Supp. 2d 555, 558-59 (M.D. Tenn. 2012), only nine were ultimately tried, United States v. Fahra, 643 F. App’x 480, 483 (6th Cir. 2016), and each was acquitted, id. at 484. Since then, numerous civil-rights complaints have been filed against St. Paul Police Officer Heather Weyker for her conduct during the investigation.” Farah v. Weyker, 926 F.3d 492 (8th Cir. 2019), involves the same officer in another case. Ahmed v. Weyker, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 40221 (8th Cir. Dec. 23, 2020).

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA8 refuses to extend Bivens to case on false arrest on false evidence

OH7: Drug testing of drug def after conviction but before sentencing was reasonable

A court ordered drug test after conviction but before sentencing was reasonable because it factors into sentence. State v. Fisher, 2020-Ohio-6829, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4672 (7th Dist. Nov. 7, 2020).

Defendant, convicted of child pornography, had a release condition that he submit to electronic searches. The condition was reasonably related to his offense, and it is reasonable under the state constitution’s heightened standard for parole searches. Commonwealth v. Feliz, 2020 Mass. LEXIS 787 (Dec. 23, 2020).

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH7: Drug testing of drug def after conviction but before sentencing was reasonable

D.Md.: Taking driver’s cell phone with DL during traffic stop unreasonably extended stop and violated 4A

Taking defendant’s cell phone with DL during a traffic stop unreasonably extended the stop and was in excess of the purpose of a traffic stop. United States v. Morganstern, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 240746 (D. Me. Dec. 22, 2020).

A police officer approaching a parked car late at night was acting in his community caretaking capacity when he asked for the driver to roll down the window so he could check on her. State v. Foote, 2020 ND 266, 2020 N.D. LEXIS 265 (Dec. 17, 2020).*

Defendant’s staleness challenge was not raised as an IAC claim below. Even if it’s considered on the merits, he would lose because it wasn’t stale. Moore v. State, 2020 Md. App. LEXIS 1208 (Dec. 21, 2020).*

Posted in Cell phones, Community caretaking function, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Md.: Taking driver’s cell phone with DL during traffic stop unreasonably extended stop and violated 4A

ND: Evidence seized by SW still needs to comply with rules of evidence to be admissible

Just because evidence was seized with a search warrant doesn’t make it admissible. The rules of evidence or other statute or rule still have to be complied with. City of Fargo v. Hofer, 2020 ND 252, 2020 N.D. LEXIS 264 (Dec. 17, 2020).

Defendant’s motion for new trial sought reassessment of a motion to suppress with a post-trial Franks challenge. Defendant doesn’t show it was newly discovered information. People v. Abcumby-Blair, 2020 Mich. App. LEXIS 8611 (Dec. 22, 2020).*

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on ND: Evidence seized by SW still needs to comply with rules of evidence to be admissible

E.D.Tenn.: SW for premises didn’t justify stop of car allowed to leave

A search warrant for the premises here did not justify defendants’ stop in their car after they were allowed to leave it. Moreover, there was no reasonable suspicion for the stop; no traffic violation, no nothing. United States v. Williamson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 239551 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 24, 2020), adopted 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238592 (E.D. Tenn. Dec. 18, 2020).

Two Secret Service agents at defendant’s car window showing their credentials wasn’t a seizure. Claiming the racial difference between defendant and the agents isn’t an issue: “These facts do not actually distinguish Debona because that opinion does not indicate the race of any of the participants. Assuming without deciding that Defendant points to a meaningful distinction, it is not enough, when considering the totality of the circumstances, to render Defendant’s encounter a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.” United States v. Miller, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 240420 (N.D. Ga. Nov. 5, 2020).*

Posted in Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: SW for premises didn’t justify stop of car allowed to leave

The Intercept: Powerful Mobile Phone Surveillance Tool Operates in Obscurity Across the Country

The Intercept: Powerful Mobile Phone Surveillance Tool Operates in Obscurity Across the Country by Sam Richards (“CellHawk helps law enforcement visualize large quantities of information collected by cellular towers and providers.”)

Posted in Cell phones, Digital privacy | Comments Off on The Intercept: Powerful Mobile Phone Surveillance Tool Operates in Obscurity Across the Country

The Crime Report: Is Your Phone Safe? The Dangers of Police Access to Private Digital Data

The Crime Report: Is Your Phone Safe? The Dangers of Police Access to Private Digital Data by Christa Miller (“A recent report from the Washington, D.C. nonprofit Upturn highlights the privacy and civil rights concerns arising from the use of mobile device forensic tools (MDFTs) by law enforcement agencies in the United States. ‘Mass Extraction: The Widespread Power of U.S. Law Enforcement to Search Mobile Phones’ documents the use of MDFTs by more than 2,000 state and local law enforcement agencies.”)

Posted in Cell phones, Digital privacy | Comments Off on The Crime Report: Is Your Phone Safe? The Dangers of Police Access to Private Digital Data

E.D.Ky.: Standing established by def’s own recorded jail call

A jail call showed defendant’s standing that he lived in the house where the search occurred. The entry to arrest him on an arrest warrant led to a valid plain view. United States v. Essex, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238989 (E.D. Ky. Oct. 22, 2020).

“And based on the collective knowledge of the law enforcement agents, Deputy Britt had probable cause to stop and search Defendant’s car regardless of any traffic violations.” United States v. Morris, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 240421 (N.D. Ga. Nov. 11, 2020).*

Posted in Collective knowledge, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Standing established by def’s own recorded jail call

OH: Touching fog line not traffic violation

Resolving a state conflict, touching the right fog line is not a violation of Ohio’s traffic laws. State v. Turner, 2020-Ohio-6773, 2020 Ohio LEXIS 2814 (Dec. 22, 2020).

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing at a hearing an issue that was briefed before the hearing and was considered by the trial court. State v. Murray, 2020 Del. Super. LEXIS 3003 (Dec. 22, 2020).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH: Touching fog line not traffic violation

PA state const. requires actual exigency for automobile exception

Resolving tension in its cases, Pennsylvania holds that its state automobile exception requires both probable cause and an actual exigency. Commonwealth v. Alexander, 2020 Pa. LEXIS 6439 (Dec. 22, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Automobile exception, State constitution | Comments Off on PA state const. requires actual exigency for automobile exception

Law.com: Fired COVID-19 Data Scientist Sues Over Police Raid: ‘I’m Worried … Where We’re Going’

Law.com: Fired COVID-19 Data Scientist Sues Over Police Raid: ‘I’m Worried … Where We’re Going’ by Rachel Lean (“An armed police raid of a fired COVID-19 data scientist’s home sparked a lawsuit Monday in Leon Circuit Court, which claims the ‘sham’ search warrant was actually served to punish her for speaking out against Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Law.com: Fired COVID-19 Data Scientist Sues Over Police Raid: ‘I’m Worried … Where We’re Going’

CA8: Forgetting to get SW signed for a vehicle didn’t matter where there was PC

The officer prepared an affidavit and search warrant for a vehicle search and took the paperwork to a state judge. They forgot to get the warrant signed. The search was still valid because there was probable cause to search the car, even though it had been impounded and removed from the scene. United States v. Soderman, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 39884 (8th Cir. Dec. 21, 2020).

Pro se plaintiff’s § 1983 case was barred by limitations. The fact he wasn’t from New Jersey and didn’t know of their two year SoL doesn’t matter because ignorance of the law is no excuse. The court does not credit his equitable tolling claim he was threatened to do nothing when he did something, albeit late. Burk v. N.J. State Police, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 239505 (D.N.J. Dec. 21, 2020).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA8: Forgetting to get SW signed for a vehicle didn’t matter where there was PC

CA5: GFE applies to SW with outdated Google Map image but with correct address

The good faith exception applies to the officer’s accidentally using an outdated Google maps image in a search warrant application but with a correct actual address. “The circumstances make clear that [Officer] Herron’s mistake was an honest one-a far cry from ‘reckless disregard for the truth.’ Id. What’s more, Herron’s mistake was not really a mistake at all, for any alleged error was cured when Purser led the officers to his correct address and they searched his actual residence. Thus, the good-faith exception applies.” United States v. Purser, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 39963 (5th Cir. Dec. 21, 2020).

Defendant showed ineffective assistance of counsel for defense counsel’s failure to argue a Fourth Amendment violation for seizure of a gun that came into evidence at trial. People v. Bloxton, 2020 IL App (1st) 181216, 2020 Ill. App. LEXIS 867 (Dec. 21, 2020).*

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA5: GFE applies to SW with outdated Google Map image but with correct address

D.N.H.: Separate PC was shown even though stop was made to aid DEA investigation

Officers wanted defendant’s car stopped and probable cause for a searched developed because they didn’t want to reveal a DEA investigation. The traffic officer waited for a traffic violation and then developed probable cause during the stop. United States v. Balser, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 239177 (D.N.H. Dec. 21, 2020). [Watch for stops that appear to have an alternative actual basis. I’ve had at least a dozen traffic stops where it became apparent that the officers knew the defendant was coming, likely from a CI, and then made the stop and hoped for reason to call in a drug dog to sanitize the stop from its actual cause to not burn their CI.]

An arrest on mistaken identity but with probable cause doesn’t usually violate the Fourth Amendment. “Williams argues, for the first time, that Geier and Shirah violated his right to an unreasonable seizure by detaining him on a charge of harassment without probable cause after they discovered his true identity. But, as a court of review, we do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal.” Williams v. City of Montgomery, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 39925 (11th Cir. Dec. 21, 2020).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Pretext, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Separate PC was shown even though stop was made to aid DEA investigation

OH5: For collective knowledge, state needs to call all officers involved

Defendant prevails on his claim the state failed to show collective knowledge. Only one officer testified at the suppression hearing, and nothing showed what the reporting officer knew. State v. Chattoo, 2020-Ohio-6800, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4635 (5th Dist. Dec. 18, 2020).

Defendant was not in custody during a traffic stop when he was asked for consent and consented. Cox v. State, 2020 Ind. App. LEXIS 545 (Dec. 21, 2020).*

The search warrant here was based on a year-long report of gunfire near defendant’s place, and the most recent was rapid fire consistent with the weapon they were seeking. Therefore, it was not stale. United States v. Duke, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 39901 (6th Cir. Dec. 18, 2020).*

Posted in Collective knowledge, Consent, Staleness | Comments Off on OH5: For collective knowledge, state needs to call all officers involved

The Crime Report: Chicago Mayor Fires Top Lawyer Over Botched Raid Video

The Crime Report: Chicago Mayor Fires Top Lawyer Over Botched Raid Video (“Chicago city lawyers made the rare move of apologetically withdrawing a request for federal court sanctions against a lawyer after the public release of video of a botched police raid, reports the Chicago Sun-Times. Mayor Lori Lightfoot told NBC 5 she ‘sought and received’ the resignation of Mark Flessner as the city’s top lawyer after criticism of his actions in the case. “)

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on The Crime Report: Chicago Mayor Fires Top Lawyer Over Botched Raid Video

GA: LPN at nursing home had no REP in patient’s room from video recording

A rehabilitation center resident’s son put a video camera in his father’s room because of the father’s concern that “strange things” were happening there at night. The resident wanted his son to stay there but he couldn’t because of his stepchildren while his wife was a work. An LPN at the center charged with elder abuse claimed she had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the room under the state recording statute. Looking at Fourth Amendment cases, the court concludes she didn’t. Nuckles v. State, 2020 Ga. LEXIS 927 (Dec. 21, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA: LPN at nursing home had no REP in patient’s room from video recording

CA8: DV order of protection and def’s seeking his firearms was PC for SW

Defendant was under a DV order of protection and repeatedly attempted to recover firearms from the police department, and that was probable cause for a warrant for his house. United States v. Bachler, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 39772 (8th Cir. Dec. 18, 2020).*

A stop of a full vehicle parked on the wrong side of the street with the motor running after a nearby shots fired call led to asking defendant about a firearm, and he said he had a concealed carry permit. Seeing a likely other gun in the car was justification for a weapons search. United States v. Anderson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238349 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 18, 2020).*

Posted in Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA8: DV order of protection and def’s seeking his firearms was PC for SW

ND: While cracked windshield isn’t violation of state law, it wasn’t unreasonable for officer to conclude it was

A cracked windshield on the passenger side is not a violation of state law, but it was not unreasonable for the officer to conclude that it was. Therefore, the stop was not unreasonable. State v. Bolme, 2020 ND 255, 2020 N.D. LEXIS 258 (Dec. 17, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on ND: While cracked windshield isn’t violation of state law, it wasn’t unreasonable for officer to conclude it was

OR: The fact some people lie is not RS

The officer had no subjective or objective reasonable suspicion that the vehicle defendant was driving, his mother’s, was without her permission, just become some people lie. State v. Smith, 308 Ore. App. 84 (Dec. 16, 2020).

Defendant was claimed to have threated a fast food worker with violence in the store and said he was coming back with a gun. He came back and the police came too. He didn’t have a weapon on his person, and the automobile exception permitted a search of his car. “Anderson has not disputed the facts proffered by the government in opposition to the motion to suppress. As a consequence, no evidentiary hearing was required and the motion could be decided based on the briefs of the parties and supporting documentation.” United States v. Anderson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238480 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 18, 2020).*

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: The fact some people lie is not RS