Monthly Archives: February 2026

GA: Curtilage for 4A purposes isn’t the same for defense of the home from an intruder

Curtilage for Fourth Amendment purposes isn’t the same for defense of the home from an intruder. Graham v. State, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 25 (Feb. 3, 2026):

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on GA: Curtilage for 4A purposes isn’t the same for defense of the home from an intruder

WaPo: Homeland Security is targeting Americans with this secretive legal weapon

WaPo: Homeland Security is targeting Americans with this secretive legal weapon by John Woodrow Cox (“In October, a retiree emailed a DHS attorney to urge mercy for an asylum seeker. Then DHS subpoenaed his Google account and sent investigators to … Continue reading

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on WaPo: Homeland Security is targeting Americans with this secretive legal weapon

D.Ariz.: No standing to raise fruit of poisonous tree argument because “it’s not his tree”

No standing to challenge the stop of a car he wasn’t in or wasn’t his. United States v. Flores-Mendivil, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20776 (D. Ariz. Feb. 2, 2026)*:

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: No standing to raise fruit of poisonous tree argument because “it’s not his tree”

N.D.Iowa: Nexus shown to cell phone in harassing letters case

The ubiquity of cell phones makes them likely sources of evidence in crimes. Here, there was [at least a slim] nexus to the cell phone and iPad being involved in sending harassing letters. United States v. Goodman, 2026 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Nexus shown to cell phone in harassing letters case

D.Minn.: No continuing preservation order for state BCA v. federal investigators in Pretti killing

The State of Minnesota obtained a search warrant for DHS investigative materials, which was ignored, and then sued DHS over its investigation into the Alex Pretti killing. The District of Minnesota still applies the presumption of regularity and declines to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Minn.: No continuing preservation order for state BCA v. federal investigators in Pretti killing

CNS: 10th Circuit flags ‘Kansas two-step’ traffic cop trick as unconstitutional

CNS: 10th Circuit flags ‘Kansas two-step’ traffic cop trick as unconstitutional by Andrew J. Nelson (case posted here) (“A 10th Circuit panel on Thursday found that out-of-state motorists who sued Kansas over a traffic stop tactic have standing, but a … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CNS: 10th Circuit flags ‘Kansas two-step’ traffic cop trick as unconstitutional

D.S.D.: “Dismissal of an indictment is not an appropriate remedy for a Fourth Amendment violation.”

“Dismissal of an indictment is not an appropriate remedy for a Fourth Amendment violation. United States v. Chavez, 705 F.3d 381, 386 (8th Cir. 2013).” It may be for a due process violation. United States v. Pryor, 2026 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on D.S.D.: “Dismissal of an indictment is not an appropriate remedy for a Fourth Amendment violation.”

N.D.Ga.: 28-day delay in getting SW for phones wasn’t unreasonable here

Defendant was driving a car with a fraudulent VIN but claimed he knew nothing about that, having borrowed the car. Other things in the car added to probable cause to believe he was involved in frauds, and that ultimately led … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: 28-day delay in getting SW for phones wasn’t unreasonable here

OH6: Search claim resolved in criminal case is collateral estoppel in forfeiture

This is a forfeiture after defendant lost his search claim in his criminal case. The search issue is res judicata or collateral estoppel in the forfeiture. State v. Pitts, 2026-Ohio-292 (6th Dist. Jan. 30, 2026). Defendant’s superseding indictment raising the … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on OH6: Search claim resolved in criminal case is collateral estoppel in forfeiture

ND: When the main way into a house is through the garage, no violation of curtilage to enter

While this house was being worked on, the way in was through the garage and door inside there, not the front door. Therefore, police were able to come through the garage to knock. Therefore, no violation of curtilage making the … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ND: When the main way into a house is through the garage, no violation of curtilage to enter

CA9: No QI for knowingly presenting material false testimony in support of a warrant

No qualified immunity for knowingly presenting material false testimony in support of a warrant. Gibson v. City of Portland, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 2646 (9th Cir. Jan. 29, 2026). As to Franks: “Even if there were a material omission, inclusion … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: No QI for knowingly presenting material false testimony in support of a warrant

S.D.N.Y.: Mangione’s backpack subject to safety search and inventory on his arrest in a McDonald’s

Luigi Mangione’s backpack was properly searched both as a safety search and an inventory yet incident to his arrest at an Altoona, PA McDonald’s. He was the subject of a multistate manhunt for gunning down an insurance executive in broad … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Mangione’s backpack subject to safety search and inventory on his arrest in a McDonald’s

W.D.Tex.: Arias deportation stayed, habeas granted, citing 4A and Declaration of Independence

Arias v. Noem, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20726 (W.D. Tex. Jan. 31, 2026) [they are detained in Texas]: Before the Court is the petition of asylum seeker Adrian Conejo Arias and his five-year-old son for protection of the Great Writ … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Arias deportation stayed, habeas granted, citing 4A and Declaration of Independence

CA10: KS’s enforcement policy on MJ stops was sufficient to create standing for some injunctive relief

Plaintiffs, motorists driving between Oklahoma, where marijuana is legal, and Kansas, where it’s not, showed standing with a sufficient likelihood of being stopped again by the state’s own enforcement policy to ‘STOP A LOT OF CARS!’ Shaw v. Smith, 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on CA10: KS’s enforcement policy on MJ stops was sufficient to create standing for some injunctive relief