Monthly Archives: August 2025

Reason: Automated License Plate Readers Are Watching You

Reason: Automated License Plate Readers Are Watching You by Jacob Sullum (“The technology enables routine surveillance that would have troubled the Fourth Amendment’s framers.”)

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on Reason: Automated License Plate Readers Are Watching You

VA: Dog repeatedly jumping onto the vehicle during the dog sniff was a search

The drug-sniffing dog’s repeatedly jumping onto and placing paws on a vehicle during a drug sniff constitutes a physical trespass for the purpose of obtaining information, and therefore qualifies as a search under the Fourth Amendment. Commonwealth v. Wiggins, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Search, Trespass | Comments Off on VA: Dog repeatedly jumping onto the vehicle during the dog sniff was a search

MS: The CIs were co-conspirators and eyewitnesses and could be credited

The three informants were co-conspirators, eyewitnesses, and participants in the crime, and their information could be credited for search warrant. Taylor v. State, 2025 Miss. App. LEXIS 292 (Aug. 12, 2025). Defendant’s 2255 re-raises his Fourth Amendment claim already rejected. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: The CIs were co-conspirators and eyewitnesses and could be credited

Reason: Warrantless Use of License Plate Reader Cameras Is Unconstitutional

Reason: Warrantless Use of License Plate Reader Cameras Is Unconstitutional by Joe Lancaster (“A new campaign pushes back against the widespread use of automatic license plate readers without warrants.”) {Not likely.}

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on Reason: Warrantless Use of License Plate Reader Cameras Is Unconstitutional

CA2: Subsequent officer’s entry into protective sweep wasn’t unreasonable; it was considered part of the first

The protective sweep of defendant’s garage which led to an observation that made it into the warrant application was reasonable. A later entry into the garage by another officer wasn’t unreasonable. It mimicked the first. United States v. Constantinescu, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Subsequent officer’s entry into protective sweep wasn’t unreasonable; it was considered part of the first

MN: Mere propinquity to armed person not RS

Frisk of appellant for merely being near an armed person was without reasonable suspicion. In re C.T.B., 2025 Minn. LEXIS 392 (Aug. 13, 2025). There was arguable probable cause for defendant’s arrest. The claim that evidence was fabricated fails. “But … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Trespass, Waiver | Comments Off on MN: Mere propinquity to armed person not RS

CA5: Officer’s resting hand on truck while talking to def wasn’t a seizure

The officer resting his hand on defendant’s truck while talking to him during a stop was not a separate seizure of him. United States v. Larremore, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20757 (5th Cir. Aug. 14, 2025). The closest case plaintiff … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Qualified immunity, Seizure, Standards of review, Trespass | Comments Off on CA5: Officer’s resting hand on truck while talking to def wasn’t a seizure

M.D.Ala.: Open carry is not RS

Alabama permits open carry, and doing so is not reasonable suspicion. United States v. Mitchell, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156980 (M.D. Ala. Aug. 13, 2025):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Open carry is not RS

CA9: Day care centers pervasively regulated for administrative searches

Child day care centers are sufficiently regulated by the state that they may be inspected. Foothills Christian Ministries v. Johnson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20697 (9th Cir. Aug. 14, 2025). Defendant’s challenge to the basis for his stop that led … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Day care centers pervasively regulated for administrative searches

WaPo: Checkpoint with ICE agents met by protesters in D.C.

WaPo: Checkpoint with ICE agents met by protesters in D.C. by Emma Uber and Lauren Morello (“Department of Homeland Security agents stopped cars at a busy intersection for seat belt violations and broken taillights.”):

Posted in Immigration checkpoints, Roadblocks | Comments Off on WaPo: Checkpoint with ICE agents met by protesters in D.C.

W.D.N.C.: Photographic evidence of basis of stop not required

Where the stop is based on partial covering of the LPN, a photograph is not required at the suppression hearing. United States v. Tribble, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156885 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 13, 2025). Plaintiff’s issue of “the application for and … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Photographic evidence of basis of stop not required

TX8 sustains geofence warrant

TX8, El Paso without much discussion sustains a geofence warrant. Also the warrants for the phone and social media accounts were issued with probable cause and were particular. Alvarez v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 6106 (Tex. App. – El … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, geofence, Social media warrants | Comments Off on TX8 sustains geofence warrant

CA8: Running when asked about a gun was RS

“Running in response to the question about the gun is what gave the officers reasonable suspicion to think he might have one.” Then he tossed his gun “while tussling with officers.” United States v. Chumley, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20497 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA8: Running when asked about a gun was RS

W.D.N.Y.: No exigency shown for warrantless domestic entry

Based on the complaint, there were no exigent circumstances justifying the warrantless entry into the home for a domestic disturbance that had calmed way down before police got there. Intertwined is the qualified immunity claim, and there’s not enough here … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: No exigency shown for warrantless domestic entry

N.D.Ill.: A mistake on the address was made up for by other detail; no Franks violation

“To the extent the lack of an address lessens a warrant’s particularity, the other information more than makes up for it. … In this case, Walters highlights one factual error: No glass door bearing the numbers ‘13624’ existed when the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: A mistake on the address was made up for by other detail; no Franks violation

S.D.W.Va.: RS determined at the time of stop, not by what found after

A “black man with a waving a gun” did not justify defendant’s stop. When officers arrived, he was just there. No gun visible or apparent. Reasonable suspicion is determined at the time, not after the fact. United States v. Wilder, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: RS determined at the time of stop, not by what found after

D.C.Cir.: Pole camera not governed by mosaic theory

Pole camera surveillance of a resident was reasonable and the mosaic theory did not apply. United States v. Green, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20410 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 12, 2025):

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Pole camera not governed by mosaic theory

Latin Times: Trump Administration Pushes to Use Spanish Language as Grounds for Immigration Stops

Latin Times: Trump Administration Pushes to Use Spanish Language as Grounds for Immigration Stops in California by Pedro Camacho (“The administration argued that agents should be able to rely on these indicators when enforcing immigration laws.”) I had an associate … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Latin Times: Trump Administration Pushes to Use Spanish Language as Grounds for Immigration Stops

MI: Two controlled buys where def left house to do it and returned was PC for house

The informant’s information here [to me] was conclusorily stated by the officer to be reliable [not discussed], except there were also two controlled buys from the defendant where he left his place and returned. [The latter is enough.] People v. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on MI: Two controlled buys where def left house to do it and returned was PC for house

Four on IAC claims

Appellant doesn’t get a CoA on his claim he could have appealed the denial of the suppression motion despite the guilty plea. United States v. Penton, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20172 (5th Cir. Aug. 7, 2025).* “Thus, Loston’s claim fails … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on Four on IAC claims