Monthly Archives: April 2021

W.D.Pa.: Def can show standing from govt’s papers, including affidavit for SW, and its case at suppression hearing

The defendant has the burden of showing standing, if raised, but he doesn’t have to testify to do it. The affidavit for the warrant here said the place to be searched was defendant’s and that’s enough. Other cases in this … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Def can show standing from govt’s papers, including affidavit for SW, and its case at suppression hearing

N.D.Okla.: Not readily finding def in his motel room justified its protective sweep

The protective sweep of defendant’s motel room was reasonable, and it was also justified by a search waiver. There was a woman in the room who was not the defendant they were looking for. United States v. Banegas, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Not readily finding def in his motel room justified its protective sweep

Reason: Cops Are Using Facial Recognition Technology More Than Previously Revealed

Reason: Cops Are Using Facial Recognition Technology More Than Previously Revealed by J.D. Tuccille (“The surveillance state is available as a plug-and-play solution for any cop interested in a free trial period.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Reason: Cops Are Using Facial Recognition Technology More Than Previously Revealed

W.D.Tenn.: CI’s tip def had a gun was corroborated by def discarding it in view of officers

Police received a CI’s tip defendant had a gun. The tip alone lacked reliability until the officer saw defendant discard it. “Notably, the reasonable suspicion standard does not present the most demanding hurdle to overcome. See Kansas v. Glover, 140 … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: CI’s tip def had a gun was corroborated by def discarding it in view of officers

ID: Violation of citizen’s arrest statute not a const’l violation; no suppression

The officer arrested defendant for a completed misdemeanor of stealing a cell phone not occurring in his presence. The manager of the place where it happened wanted defendant arrested. The officer and the manager never informed defendant this was a … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Common law, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on ID: Violation of citizen’s arrest statute not a const’l violation; no suppression

OR: State didn’t develop its argument about RS at the hearing, and it’s found waived

The state’s justification for inquiries about travel plans isn’t reached on appeal because it wasn’t briefed or even developed below. Instead, the questions about it related only to initial reasonable suspicion. “We conclude that the record could have developed differently … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Standards of review, Waiver | Comments Off on OR: State didn’t develop its argument about RS at the hearing, and it’s found waived

D.C.: Body cam didn’t support trial court finding of consent to feel a bag; it essentially happened as one move as officer asked for consent

The record doesn’t support the trial court’s finding of consent to a squeeze of a bag that revealed a gun. The officer was reaching for the bag asking for consent. “The government played footage from Denton’s body worn camera (‘BWC’), … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.C.: Body cam didn’t support trial court finding of consent to feel a bag; it essentially happened as one move as officer asked for consent

S.D.Tex.: Affidavit of convicted felon who may have been conspirator and was deported wasn’t sufficient offer of proof under Franks in face of other evidence

Defendant’s claim was that alleged cocaine wrappers found were actually wrappers for peanut butter and jelly sandwiches and that’s a Franks violation. “The only evidence that Defendant has produced to support his contention that the bags contained sandwiches is the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Affidavit of convicted felon who may have been conspirator and was deported wasn’t sufficient offer of proof under Franks in face of other evidence

S.D.Ohio: Pole cam observation of def with blunt was RS for stop

Zooming in on a pole cam video, officers determined that defendant had a blunt in his hand when he was getting in his car. The question is reasonable suspicion, and officers don’t have to exhaust the innocent possibilities before acting … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Pole cameras, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Pole cam observation of def with blunt was RS for stop

E.D.Pa.: Warrantless arrest with PC in public place is reasonable

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights were not violated when he was arrested without a warrant with probable cause in a public place. Reaching in defendant’s sweat shirt pocket to retrieve a gun was reasonable. United States v. Kelly-Sizer, 2021 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Warrantless arrest with PC in public place is reasonable

CA6: Pre-Carpenter cell site simulator use reasonable by GFE

Defendant’s 2255 claim that the government used a cell site simulator prior to Carpenter to capture his unlisted burner phone numbers is saved by the good faith exception. Powell v. United States, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 9850 (6th Cir. Apr. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site simulators, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA6: Pre-Carpenter cell site simulator use reasonable by GFE

E.D.Cal.: Ptf inmate’s unreasonable prison strip search case survives screening

Plaintiff, an inmate at Corcoran, stated enough to survive screening for his prison strip search case. Jacobs v. CDCR, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66813 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2021):

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Ptf inmate’s unreasonable prison strip search case survives screening

S.D.N.Y.: Defense counsel giving passcode to def’s cell phone at AUSA’s request wasn’t consent; merely avoiding delay of decryption

An AUSA’s request of defense counsel for defendant’s cell phone’s passcode was not a request for consent. It was merely to avoid the delay of decryption. United States v. Mangini, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66764 (S.D. N.Y. Apr. 6, 2021):

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Privileges | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Defense counsel giving passcode to def’s cell phone at AUSA’s request wasn’t consent; merely avoiding delay of decryption

S.D.Ala.: Younger doctrine precludes ptf’s 4A claim over pending state criminal case

Plaintiff’s false arrest claim claiming, inter alia, a Fourth Amendment violation, two years into his pending state criminal case was barred by the Younger doctrine. Sweeting v. Garrett, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66705 (S.D. Ala. Apr. 6, 2021). Under Washington’s … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: Younger doctrine precludes ptf’s 4A claim over pending state criminal case

D.Mont.: Particularity for the property to be searched was shown

Defendant showed standing on the totality to challenge the search of the property where he rented a room. Particularity was shown for the place to be searched. United States v. Dolphay, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66415 (D. Mont. Apr. 6, … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Particularity for the property to be searched was shown

CA8: Warrantless seizure of computer in fraud case was reasonable because of exigency

The warrantless seizure of defendant’s computer was justified by exigent circumstances that it contained evidence of fraud. United States v. Mays, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 9861 (8th Cir. Apr. 6, 2021). “Because we conclude that the officer’s initial question about … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA8: Warrantless seizure of computer in fraud case was reasonable because of exigency

WI: Consent to search a computer was limited to def’s son’s user files; forensically searching recycle bin exceeded the scope of consent

Defendant granted consent to search only his son’s files on his computer. The forensic analyst searched the recycle bin, too, and that exceeded the scope of consent. Shared files were not within the scope of consent. State v. Jereczek, 2021 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Scope of search | Comments Off on WI: Consent to search a computer was limited to def’s son’s user files; forensically searching recycle bin exceeded the scope of consent

D.Ariz.: Def’s motion to unseal SW affidavit denied because of ongoing investigation

Defendant’s motion to unseal the affidavit for the search warrant is denied because of an ongoing investigation it would reveal and because he can’t show a lack of probable cause for the search. United States v. Calleta, 2021 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Def’s motion to unseal SW affidavit denied because of ongoing investigation

D.Minn.: Crime Stoppers tip was sufficiently corroborated to show PC

Crime Stoppers tip was sufficiently corroborated to show probable cause [under Gates]. United States v. Gaston, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65724 (D. Minn. Apr. 5, 2021):

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Crime Stoppers tip was sufficiently corroborated to show PC

OH12: Stop of bicyclist for no light produced arrest warrant; valid under Strieff

Defendant was stopped on his bicycle for no headlight, and that led to finding an arrest warrant for him. Under Strieff, the legality of the stop becomes almost irrelevant to the search incident for the arrest warrant as attenuated. State … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on OH12: Stop of bicyclist for no light produced arrest warrant; valid under Strieff