Monthly Archives: January 2021

E.D.Tenn.: Def’s car that others were known to drive being outside house of another wasn’t reasonable belief he was there

Officers did not have a reasonable belief defendant was on the premises of another just because he was seen there a month earlier and what was somewhat believed to be his car was parked out outside just before the entry. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Def’s car that others were known to drive being outside house of another wasn’t reasonable belief he was there

MA: Planning of homicide with co-conspirator was nexus for cell phone SW

It was reasonable for the magistrate to conclude that evidence of defendant’s planning of a homicide would be on his cell phone because he communicated with co-conspirators. Therefore, nexus to the phone was shown. Commonwealth v. Snow, 2021 Mass. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on MA: Planning of homicide with co-conspirator was nexus for cell phone SW

GA: Cell phone believed to be on def’s person at time of robbery and murder is subject for SW for evidence of the crimes

The affidavit for the warrant showed probable cause and particularity for search of defendant’s cell phone for evidence of an armed robbery and murder [essentially on the officer’s experience]. The trial court suppressed a pre-warrant search of defendant’s cell phone, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Particularity | Comments Off on GA: Cell phone believed to be on def’s person at time of robbery and murder is subject for SW for evidence of the crimes

NE: State failed in its burden of proof on inventory; the defense has no duty to clear up confusion in the proof

The state carried the burden, and it failed to prove that the inventory of defendant’s vehicle followed standardized procedure or was reasonable. The defense had no burden to clear up any evidentiary confusion because the state had the burden. State … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Inventory, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on NE: State failed in its burden of proof on inventory; the defense has no duty to clear up confusion in the proof

AZ: Third party doctrine after Carpenter doesn’t require SW for IP addresses and subscriber info

The third party doctrine after Carpenter does not make IP addresses and subscriber information protected by the Fourth Amendment or the state constitution. State v. Mixon, 2021 Ariz. LEXIS 3 (Jan. 11, 2021):

Posted in Digital privacy, State constitution, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on AZ: Third party doctrine after Carpenter doesn’t require SW for IP addresses and subscriber info

KY: Smell of burning marijuana from a house alone is not exigency

The entry here could not be justified as a protective sweep because of a lack of reason to believe the person sought was there. It also can’t be justified by exigency because of the smell of burning marijuana alone. Nothing … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on KY: Smell of burning marijuana from a house alone is not exigency

E.D.Cal.: 8A applies to excessive force claims in prison

The Eighth Amendment applies to excessive force claims in prison; the Fourth Amendment to free worlders. Rodriguez v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4100 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2021). The court believes the officer over the defendant on whether … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: 8A applies to excessive force claims in prison

NY: Tenants can consent to a rental property inspection

In a rental property inspection, the tenants consented, and that was constitutionally sufficient. Town of Huntington v. CFLNYNY, LLC, 2021 NY Slip Op 50009(U), 2021 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 27 (Suffolk Co. Jan. 7, 2021).* There was probable cause for a … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY: Tenants can consent to a rental property inspection

E.D.Tenn.: Address wasn’t required where picture of property was in SW

Defendant’s address wasn’t included in the affidavit for the search warrant, but its picture was and there was no mistake on the place searched. That was sufficient. United States v. Lingo, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3861 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 8, … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Address wasn’t required where picture of property was in SW

D.Del.: Videotaping an otherwise valid prison strip search isn’t a per se 4A violation

“Plaintiff does not allege that the search itself violated his rights but, rather, it is the recording of the search that he finds objectionable.” “[U]sing a camera to record a strip search in a prison does not, by itself, amount … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search | Comments Off on D.Del.: Videotaping an otherwise valid prison strip search isn’t a per se 4A violation

CA10: Ptf’s conviction barred his 1983 claim because it established facts against him under Heck

“Mr. Birch’s convictions preclude him from establishing a genuine issue of material fact as to his Fourth Amendment excessive force claims against Officers Sinclair, Page, and Stout, Fourteenth Amendment malicious prosecution claims, and Fourth Amendment false arrest claims. In dismissing … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA10: Ptf’s conviction barred his 1983 claim because it established facts against him under Heck

D.Colo.: Failure to call the officers with enough information to show collective knowledge as witnesses made govt fail in its burden of proof

The government failed to prove collective knowledge at the hearing on the motion to suppress. A critical witness to collective knowledge wasn’t called. United States v. De La Rosa-Calderon, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3378 (D. Colo. Jan. 7, 2021):

Posted in Burden of proof, Collective knowledge | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Failure to call the officers with enough information to show collective knowledge as witnesses made govt fail in its burden of proof

CA6: 4A 1983 claim brought after state court reversal on search claim was untimely

Plaintiff’s 1983 unreasonable search claim is untimely. He brought the claim after his state appeal reversed his conviction on a bad search. “Dibrell’s claim is untimely under these rules. His detention ended on February 18, 2014, when he was released … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Search | Comments Off on CA6: 4A 1983 claim brought after state court reversal on search claim was untimely

CA11: Successor habeas over detention that led to confession not based on newly discovered evidence

Petitioner’s 2254 successor petition is denied on his claim that his detention was unreasonable that led to his confession. “Nero’s claims do not meet the statutory criteria. He indicates that his claims do not rely on a new rule of … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on CA11: Successor habeas over detention that led to confession not based on newly discovered evidence

D.VI.: CBP questions at border like “Did you pack the bag yourself” not subject to Miranda

Questions at Customs “Is this your bag?”; “Did you pack the bag yourself?”; and “Are you carrying anything for anyone?” are not subject to Miranda. They related to admissibility of the traveler. United States v. Bailey, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on D.VI.: CBP questions at border like “Did you pack the bag yourself” not subject to Miranda

W.D.Wash.: Demand for records from federal govt didn’t state a Washington state law claim

A demand for records from the federal government doesn’t state a claim under Washington state law when plaintiff grudgingly gave up the records. Daviscourt v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 246610 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 10, 2020)*:

Posted in State constitution, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Demand for records from federal govt didn’t state a Washington state law claim

Geofence warrants can be used to identify those who invaded the Capitol, not to mention Facebook warrants

The government’s prior use of geofence warrants were a prelude to this: With the invasion of the Capitol on Wednesday, the government now can attempt to locate all the cell phones inside the Capitol to identify those to potentially charge. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Digital privacy, Digital Searches, geofence, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Geofence warrants can be used to identify those who invaded the Capitol, not to mention Facebook warrants

W.D.Wash.: Demand for records complied with doesn’t state a state law claim for invasion of privacy

A demand for records from the federal government doesn’t state a claim under Washington state law when plaintiff grudgingly gave up the records. Daviscourt v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 246610 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 10, 2020)*:

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Demand for records complied with doesn’t state a state law claim for invasion of privacy

D.Minn.: When nexus of drugs to a residence is established, it can move with the def

If defendant moves and nexus to his residence and drugs has been established, it is a reasonable inference that the drugs went with the move. United States v. Hudson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 246482 (D. Minn. Dec.19, 2020). “On the … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: When nexus of drugs to a residence is established, it can move with the def

OR: With recreational marijuana, the smell alone isn’t RS or PC

Because possession of recreational marijuana is legal in Oregon, the smell alone is not reasonable suspicion. Here, however, there was reasonable suspicion based on additional facts of attempted concealment. State v. T.T. (In re T.T.), 308 Ore. App. 408 (Jan. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: With recreational marijuana, the smell alone isn’t RS or PC