Monthly Archives: March 2018

MA: CSLI warrant based on unsupported hearsay suppressed

The 2008 CSLI warrant here was based on a “conclusory statement” of witness statements being credible and “bereft of the factual details required to establish probable cause.” It had to be suppressed. (Based on Fourth Amendment and state constitution.) Commonwealth … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on MA: CSLI warrant based on unsupported hearsay suppressed

MA: Alternative inference to facts not drawn by hearing judge doesn’t permit reversal

An alternative interpretation of a witness’s testimony at a suppression hearing not drawn by the judge hearing the motion doesn’t permit reversal. Commonwealth v. Gonzalez, 2018 Mass. App. LEXIS 28 (Mar. 12, 2018).* Plaintiff’s complaint against a judge for an … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standards of review | Comments Off on MA: Alternative inference to facts not drawn by hearing judge doesn’t permit reversal

NE: Because of direct evidence def was involved in crime, computer search history was harmless error, if error at all

Defendant challenged the search for lack of probable cause of the search history of his computer that produced evidence he searched for violent pornographic videos that matched how the victim was killed. There was direct evidence he was involved in … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Standards of review | Comments Off on NE: Because of direct evidence def was involved in crime, computer search history was harmless error, if error at all

M.D.La.: Where def shared a car with one key, he had no standing when it was searched when he was out of possession

Defendant lacked standing in the car a gun was found in. He was free to use the car when he wanted, but he wasn’t at the time of the search. It was his grandfather’s car, there was one key, and … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Where def shared a car with one key, he had no standing when it was searched when he was out of possession

Politico: The Legal Way to Seize Guns From Dangerous People

Politico: The Legal Way to Seize Guns From Dangerous People by Alex Yablon It’s not the way President Trump suggested.

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on Politico: The Legal Way to Seize Guns From Dangerous People

W.D.Pa.: Ordering occupants to stay in parked car officer pulled up behind was a seizure, but with RS

The officer pulled up behind defendant’s parked car. “[T]he Court concludes that the officers pulling up behind the parked vehicle constituted a mere encounter that did not ripen into a seizure for Fourth Amendment purposes until Sergeant Spangler ordered Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Ordering occupants to stay in parked car officer pulled up behind was a seizure, but with RS

CA6: 4A doesn’t apply to removal of stuff from an inmate’s cell after a shakedown search

“Cody failed to state a Fourth Amendment claim for relief. He claimed that the defendants violated his Fourth Amendment rights by removing property from his cell during routine searches. But Cody was in prison, and ‘the Fourth Amendment proscription against … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA6: 4A doesn’t apply to removal of stuff from an inmate’s cell after a shakedown search

S.D.Ohio: Def was driver for drug dealer selling from car; a trash pull from his house was sufficient to show nexus

More was shown than just that defendant was a drug dealer. He was the driver for a man who regularly did drug deals and he watched them all go down. He was seen leaving a house attributed to him in … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Search | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Def was driver for drug dealer selling from car; a trash pull from his house was sufficient to show nexus

S.D.Ind.: The sole fact of being a drug trafficker doesn’t provide nexus to house; something has to be shown, and it wasn’t and GFE doesn’t apply

Being a drug trafficker is not enough to search defendant’s home. The government had to show nexus, and it never did anywhere in the affidavit for search warrant. The affidavit for the search warrant was, in fact, so lacking in … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: The sole fact of being a drug trafficker doesn’t provide nexus to house; something has to be shown, and it wasn’t and GFE doesn’t apply

OH12: Father’s admission of using heroin justified hair follicle testing in custody matter

The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in ordering hair follicle testing of the father because of his admissions he’d used heroin. Hatfield v. Cornell, 2018-Ohio-798, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 840 (12th Dist. Mar. 5, 2018). Defendant’s Franks challenge … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on OH12: Father’s admission of using heroin justified hair follicle testing in custody matter

Cal.1: Def’s false name was intended to avoid probation search condition; he’s estopped to argue exclusionary rule

“We hold that when a probationer gives a false name to a police officer, and a record check of that name fails to reveal that the probationer is in fact subject to a search condition, the probationer is estopped from … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.1: Def’s false name was intended to avoid probation search condition; he’s estopped to argue exclusionary rule

NY3: Call from DEA to stop def was based on their PC

The officers stopping defendant received a call from the DEA to stop him because he was involved with a place they were searching, having just left with a backpack as the DEA was arriving. The stop was based on their … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY3: Call from DEA to stop def was based on their PC

CA7: No 4A right to see SW before search; therefore, accidentally showing wrong warrant doesn’t violate 4A either

The Fourth Amendment does not require the search warrant be presented to the person whose premises were to be searched before it occurred. Thus, accidently presenting the wrong search warrant at the time of the search doesn’t constitutionally matter. Also, … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA7: No 4A right to see SW before search; therefore, accidentally showing wrong warrant doesn’t violate 4A either

N.D.Ohio: No IAC for not raising search issue that would lose on merits by inevitable discovery

“Nevertheless, Petitioner’s arguments for suppression do not succeed. [¶] This is because police ultimately found the firearm and ammunition from an independent source, thus defeating the need for suppression. Under the independent source doctrine, evidence that was ‘initially discovered during … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: No IAC for not raising search issue that would lose on merits by inevitable discovery

ID: Search of driver while waiting for confirmation of outstanding warrant suppressed; second search after finding it was valid; no inevitable discovery

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and it came back that there might be a warrant for him. Under state practice, the police then seek confirmation of the warrant before acting on it. Here, however, defendant was frisked incident … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Search of driver while waiting for confirmation of outstanding warrant suppressed; second search after finding it was valid; no inevitable discovery

NY2: Def ordered out of backseat of car during speeding stop resulted in admission of gun; suppressed for lack of RS

Defendant was in the backseat of a car stopped in Queens for speeding. The officer decided he was a little too nervous and had him get out and asked him what he had. Defendant said “I have a piece.” Based … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY2: Def ordered out of backseat of car during speeding stop resulted in admission of gun; suppressed for lack of RS

N.D.Ohio: Affidavit for SW didn’t support def’s claim of standing

Defendant relied on the affidavit for search warrant as showing his standing, but it didn’t resolve the question, so he fails in his burden of proof and lacks standing. The government showed nexus in the 61 page affidavit for residences … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Nexus, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Affidavit for SW didn’t support def’s claim of standing

CA10: GFE applied to cell phone SW in KS where phone was actually searched in MO

Search incident did not justify seizure of defendant’s cell phone when he was arrested because he’d been separated from the cell phone. The government’s claim that officers seizing the cell phone were proceeding under “direction of” defendant’s PO is rejected … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Search incident, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA10: GFE applied to cell phone SW in KS where phone was actually searched in MO

CA3: SW issued after alleged illegal entry was based on independent source and valid

“[W]hen police search a home pursuant to a warrant obtained after a warrantless search, evidence obtained pursuant to the warrant need not be suppressed so long as: (1) a neutral magistrate would still have issued the warrant ‘even if not … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: SW issued after alleged illegal entry was based on independent source and valid

Gizmodo: Georgetown Lawyers Sue NYPD to Reveal Its Secret Face Recognition Programs

Gizmodo: Georgetown Lawyers Sue NYPD to Reveal Its Secret Face Recognition Programs by Sidney Fussell: Researchers at the Georgetown Center of Privacy and Technology have filed suit against the NYPD for more details on the department’s highly secretive face recognition … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Gizmodo: Georgetown Lawyers Sue NYPD to Reveal Its Secret Face Recognition Programs