CA11: Service of SW without attachments isn’t 4A violation

Defendant’s effort to subpoena five witnesses in support of his Franks challenge was properly denied. Their testimony would be material to the outcome, and they were also speculative. As to the execution of the warrant, the fact he got a copy of the warrant but without attachments isn’t a Fourth Amendment violation. (Defendant was suspected of using a computer to hack into an NFL game Jumbotron and the computer search revealed child pornography.) United States v. Thompson, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 25633 (11th Cir. Aug. 24, 2026).

There was probable cause for defendant’s arrest where he was seen picking up a person who walked across the border and got into his car. United States v. Quintero-Morales, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189224 (D. Ariz. Aug. 3, 2026).*

No Rodriguez moment occurred because the length of stop was not extended and the Ranger diligently pursued the reckless driving mission. United States v. Alba, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189133 (D. Utah Aug. 21, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Immigration arrests, immigration stops, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.