OH12: Father’s admission of using heroin justified hair follicle testing in custody matter

The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in ordering hair follicle testing of the father because of his admissions he’d used heroin. Hatfield v. Cornell, 2018-Ohio-798, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 840 (12th Dist. Mar. 5, 2018).

Defendant’s Franks challenge is rejected because the omitted things don’t undermine the probable cause. A reference to “it” on a jail telephone call was reasonably inferred by the police to be a handgun. Common sense is a part of finding probable cause. United States v. Anaya, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37519 (D. N.M. Mar. 7, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Drug or alcohol testing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.