Cal.1: Def’s false name was intended to avoid probation search condition; he’s estopped to argue exclusionary rule

“We hold that when a probationer gives a false name to a police officer, and a record check of that name fails to reveal that the probationer is in fact subject to a search condition, the probationer is estopped from challenging the legality of an ensuing search or seizure that would have been authorized had the officer been aware of the condition.” People v. Mathews, 2018 Cal. App. LEXIS 195 (1st Dist. Mar. 9, 2018).

The search warrant for defendant’s house for cruelty to children for locking them in and not caring for them was issued with probable cause. Wimbush v. State, 2018 Ga. App. LEXIS 174 (Mar. 8, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.