Monthly Archives: February 2018

California Lawyer: Drone Searches: A New Frontier for the Fourth Amendment

California Lawyer: Drone Searches: A New Frontier for the Fourth Amendment By Kevin Moon and Brandon Franklin: The use of drones spurs reassessment of time-honored privacy concerns.

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on California Lawyer: Drone Searches: A New Frontier for the Fourth Amendment

NYTimes: Facial Recognition Is Accurate, if You’re a White Guy

NYTimes: Facial Recognition Is Accurate, if You’re a White Guy by Steve Lohr: When the person in the photo is a white man, the software is right 99 percent of the time. But the darker the skin, the more errors … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: Facial Recognition Is Accurate, if You’re a White Guy

MA: Two men walking together are stopped because of RS as to one; frisk of second was reasonable for officer safety

The officer here stopped Perez and Ramirez when he reasonably suspected Perez of carrying a firearm. The situation was tense, and, on the totality, the court finds the frisk of Ramirez, too, was reasonable for officer and public safety. Commonwealth … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MA: Two men walking together are stopped because of RS as to one; frisk of second was reasonable for officer safety

OH8: Affidavit for SW showed PC for weapons only; search for drugs exceeded SW’s limits

The affidavit only showed probable cause to search for weapons, not drugs, and there was no probable cause for drugs in the affidavit. As to drugs, the search warrant is suppressed. Defendant also raised the argument that the officer sought … Continue reading

Posted in Overseizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH8: Affidavit for SW showed PC for weapons only; search for drugs exceeded SW’s limits

E.D.N.C.: State law limits on parole and probation’s search authority applies in federal court; it defines the REP

Defendant was subject to a state parole search condition that required reasonable suspicion and is also governed by Griffin’s special needs exception. “the language in a parole search condition is an important factor to consider when assessing the reasonableness of … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: State law limits on parole and probation’s search authority applies in federal court; it defines the REP

ME: Nondeadly force can’t be used on a LEO arresting def in def’s own home

“This means that pursuant to section 108(1-A), French was not entitled to use nondeadly force against Ferland—who was trying to arrest her—for the purpose of defending her premises, regardless of the lawfulness of Ferland’s entry into the residence or his … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on ME: Nondeadly force can’t be used on a LEO arresting def in def’s own home

TN: Judge who issued SW can also try the case

It doesn’t violate any law or constitutional provision for a state trial court judge to issue a search warrant and then preside over the trial of the case. McKinley v. State, 2018 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 91 (Feb. 9, 2018). … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on TN: Judge who issued SW can also try the case

NE: Even if OnStar produced information the same day before the SW actually issued, inevitable discovery applies

Defendant claimed that the police obtained his OnStar information just before the search warrant for it issued. While that’s not conceded, it doesn’t matter because the search warrant was issued and the information retrieved the same day. Inevitable discovery applies, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on NE: Even if OnStar produced information the same day before the SW actually issued, inevitable discovery applies

D.Idaho: Movant failed to show govt had “callous regard” of rights for early return of property seized

The DEA seized unapproved pain relief products by a search warrant, and the company from which it was seized moved for return of the property. The court finds company hasn’t satisfied the requirements for equitable jurisdiction for return of property … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Movant failed to show govt had “callous regard” of rights for early return of property seized

E.D.N.Y.: The exclusionary doesn’t apply at sentencing

The exclusionary doesn’t apply at sentencing. United States v. Carrillo, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21731 (E.D. N.Y. Feb. 9, 2018):

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: The exclusionary doesn’t apply at sentencing

C.D.Cal.: Strong air freshener isn’t RS to extend a stop

“The Domestic Highway Enforcement Team of the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department is a special criminal investigation team employed to patrol Los Angeles County highways in search of criminal activity carried on in vehicles traveling on those highways. The team’s purpose … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Strong air freshener isn’t RS to extend a stop

E.D.N.C.: The parole search here violated the state parole search authorization and is suppressed

Defendant was subject to a state parole search condition that required reasonable suspicion and is also governed by Griffin’s special needs exception. “the language in a parole search condition is an important factor to consider when assessing the reasonableness of … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: The parole search here violated the state parole search authorization and is suppressed

D.D.C.: It doesn’t violate Franks to fail to mention a Miranda violation to gain def’s admissions (no violatIon either)

Officers had probable cause for a warrantless arrest of defendant for child pornography. “But Mr. Lieu argues that the names ‘Dave’ and ‘John’ are relatively common names and that the clothing description is too general to support the connection that … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.D.C.: It doesn’t violate Franks to fail to mention a Miranda violation to gain def’s admissions (no violatIon either)

E.D.Mich.: There was nexus for SW to def’s address from present and observed activities there

“In light of the above, there is a sufficient nexus between defendant and the Bunert address such that it was more likely than not that evidence of drug activity would be at the residence. Defendant was seen at Bunert both … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: There was nexus for SW to def’s address from present and observed activities there

CA8: Ptf couldn’t overcome QI on his facts of consent

After a search warrant was executed with a flash bang device, a St. Louis building inspector came and got consent from the occupant to conduct a search. The building inspector was entitled to qualified immunity because they can’t show their … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Ptf couldn’t overcome QI on his facts of consent

CA11: The exact description in the SW was incorrect, but the attachment cured it

“Importantly, the warrant itself refers only to ‘[t]he premises located at: 1701 Bainbridge Avenue, Pensacola, Florida 32507.’ Although Attachment A incorrectly attributes that address to the trailer, the photo and description support the conclusion that the trailer and building are … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Particularity, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA11: The exact description in the SW was incorrect, but the attachment cured it

CA4 doesn’t have to decide circuit conflict of whether smell of MJ justifies search of trunk

The smell of marijuana in the passenger compartment and more about the stop and place of stop provided probable cause for search of the entire car, including the trunk. The court notes a circuit split of whether smell in the … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA4 doesn’t have to decide circuit conflict of whether smell of MJ justifies search of trunk

GA: Hot pursuit of a traffic stop over jurisdictional lines not unlawful

Officer’s hot pursuit of a traffic offender into a different state jurisdiction didn’t void the stop. In addition, it was reasonable for the officer to time the stop for more level ground. State v. Charles, 2018 Ga. App. LEXIS 51 … Continue reading

Posted in Hot pursuit, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on GA: Hot pursuit of a traffic stop over jurisdictional lines not unlawful

D.Nev.: Motion to join motion to suppress requires showing standing, too

This defendant moved to join the motion to suppress the search of a codefendant, but “Santilli’s Motion for Joinder does not provide any details about how McGuire’s Objection applies to a search or seizure of Santilli’s property or an invasion … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Motion to join motion to suppress requires showing standing, too

S.D.Cal.: Cell phones tool of trade of border smugglers, too

“That drug smuggling operations use cell phones to contact each other, to give direction and instructions, that they use scouts and multiple vehicles to cross drugs, are all well-known strategies. [¶] It is also well-known that smugglers will buy cars … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Cell phones tool of trade of border smugglers, too