D.Nev.: Motion to join motion to suppress requires showing standing, too

This defendant moved to join the motion to suppress the search of a codefendant, but “Santilli’s Motion for Joinder does not provide any details about how McGuire’s Objection applies to a search or seizure of Santilli’s property or an invasion of his privacy.” United States v. McGuire, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18135 (D. Nev. Feb. 5, 2018).*

Defendant knew during the plea colloquy that he was giving up the right to appeal the denial of suppression motion. Therefore, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective. Garza v. United States, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18026 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 5, 2018).*

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress where defendant’s 2255 argument about the search warrant wasn’t even coherent about why there was no probable cause.
United States v. Heard, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18063 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 5, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.