Category Archives: Staleness

N.D.Ill.: Alleged violation of police dept policy on consent didn’t affect 4A claim here

The defense claim the officer somehow violated department policy in obtaining consent doesn’t bear on the constitutional question at all. There was at least reasonable suspicion for his stop and the encounter. United States v. Lopez-Garcia, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Staleness, Voluntariness, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Alleged violation of police dept policy on consent didn’t affect 4A claim here

N.D.Cal.: If bumping def on a bike was a seizure, it ended when he ran away

The officer bumped defendant on a bike. It was potentially a seizure, but “Under Hodari D. and Torres, the seizure thus ended when Daniels got up and began running down the driveway.” United States v. Daniels, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Seizure, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: If bumping def on a bike was a seizure, it ended when he ran away

NY3: Pleading guilty after suppression hearing but before decision is waiver

Pleading guilty after the suppression hearing but before it was decided is waiver. People v. Lende, 2022 NY Slip Op 02581, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2476 (3d Dept. Apr. 21, 2022). The stop here was with reasonable suspicion. Officers … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on NY3: Pleading guilty after suppression hearing but before decision is waiver

D.N.J.: That officers could have investigated more isn’t a Franks violation

“None of these allegations is sufficient to warrant a Franks hearing either. At bottom, Rodriguez is merely criticizing the tactics employed by the police during their investigation. See United States v. Swanson, 210 F.3d 788, 791 (7th Cir. 2000) (explaining … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Staleness | Comments Off on D.N.J.: That officers could have investigated more isn’t a Franks violation

NY3: SW address for 1013 Pleasant second floor permitted search when it was actually 1015 Pleasant

The address of the place to be searched in the warrant was 1013 Pleasant Street, second floor. The second floor, however, was 1015 Pleasant Street, and it was searched. The warrant is not to be view hypertechnically, and it adequately … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Particularity, Staleness | Comments Off on NY3: SW address for 1013 Pleasant second floor permitted search when it was actually 1015 Pleasant

E.D.Tenn.: Def doesn’t show a right to see whether the SW in his case was validly issued; that’s the lawyer’s call; and he pled guilty

“Petitioner alleges that Attorney Greene failed to present critical documents for Petitioner’s review prior to his guilty plea. Petitioner contends that he should have been shown ‘evidence of there being a valid search warrant,’ ‘computer chat logs where the government … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Def doesn’t show a right to see whether the SW in his case was validly issued; that’s the lawyer’s call; and he pled guilty

E.D.Pa.: Possession of a known cutting agent is PC for drug paraphernalia

“The Court notes that there is a dearth of caselaw on the issue of whether Xylazine qualifies as ‘drug paraphernalia.’ Regardless, as the weight of the evidence supports that Xylazine is frequently used as a diluent or cutting agent, the … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Possession of a known cutting agent is PC for drug paraphernalia

FL4: Prosr’s argument def refused to give password to phone violated 4A

“The trial court erred in denying Appellant’s motion in limine and allowing the State to present evidence and argument referencing Appellant’s refusal to provide his cellphone PIN and his refusal to consent to a warrantless search of his entire cellphone. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Privileges, Staleness | Comments Off on FL4: Prosr’s argument def refused to give password to phone violated 4A

CA11: Computer searches as condition of supervised release for gun crime not plain error

The district court did not plainly err in allowing supervised release searches of defendant’s computer for a gun crime. U.S.S.G. § 5D1.3(d)(7). Under precedent, a search condition does not have to be specifically related to the crime. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Staleness, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on CA11: Computer searches as condition of supervised release for gun crime not plain error

D.Mass.: SW for def’s old car and iPhone on two-year-old information they were maybe connected to a murder was stale and probative of little; no GFE either

There was no probable cause for the search of defendant’s house for evidence of a nearly two-year-old murder. Even if what was sought was there, it was highly unlikely it would prove anything. Finally, the probable cause was so lacking … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Mass.: SW for def’s old car and iPhone on two-year-old information they were maybe connected to a murder was stale and probative of little; no GFE either

MS: No REP in contraband cell phone in prison

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a contraband cell phone in prison. United States v. Jackson, 866 F.3d 982 (8th Cir. 2017). Walker v. State, 2021 Miss. App. LEXIS 502 (Dec. 7, 2021). Accord: United States v. Basaldua, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Staleness | Comments Off on MS: No REP in contraband cell phone in prison

S.D.N.Y.: 10-14 month old information sought on cell phone SW in fraud case wasn’t stale

Defendant’s car was stopped for no front license plate, and he was found to be without a valid DL. The car was towed to the 44th Precinct and inventoried, and two cell phones were seized. An officer at another precinct … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: 10-14 month old information sought on cell phone SW in fraud case wasn’t stale

NC: Undated Facebook screenshots as a part of PC showed enduring utility in what was sought, so not stale

Defendant’s argument is that Facebook screenshots showing probable cause in the affidavit for the search warrant don’t specify dates of the electronic data that’s being sought from his place. What was being sought is of enduring utility by its nature, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on NC: Undated Facebook screenshots as a part of PC showed enduring utility in what was sought, so not stale

W.D.Ark.: 16 mo. delay in forensic search of electronics was not unreasonable; PC “remained viable”

The omitted facts from the affidavit for defendant’s child pornography search warrant had no bearing on the probable cause determination, so the Franks challenge fails. Defendant’s claim that the affidavit’s reference to two successful downloads of child pornography was false … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: 16 mo. delay in forensic search of electronics was not unreasonable; PC “remained viable”

W.D.Pa.: Warrantless production of state ALPR data to FBI not governed by Carpenter

The FBI requested the state search its Automated License Plate Reader database for defendant’s LPN to trace the movement of his car. Carpenter simply cannot be made to apply to ALPR data. 106 records were found. United States v. Bowers, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Informational privacy, Staleness, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Warrantless production of state ALPR data to FBI not governed by Carpenter

D.Alaska: SW affidavit accidentally in the jury room during deliberations wasn’t looked at so no error

The search warrant affidavit for the search warrant for defendant’s backpack accidentally went to the jury room in deliberations with the backpack. The court finds that this wasn’t error because 10 of the 12 jurors said they didn’t know that … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Alaska: SW affidavit accidentally in the jury room during deliberations wasn’t looked at so no error

S.D.Cal.: NCIS obtained def’s phone passcode by 4A violation

NCIS obtained defendant’s passcode for his iPhone 6 by a Fourth Amendment violation by seeking to see him enter it when he was consciously trying to avoid them seeing it. Inevitable discovery also does not apply. United States v. Booker, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: NCIS obtained def’s phone passcode by 4A violation

OH1: Years-old information of trafficking with current info of personal use isn’t PC for trafficking

Where the officer’s affidavit consisted only of years-old stale information and present evidence of personal drug use, there was no probable cause to search the defendant’s residence for evidence of drug trafficking, and the trial court erred in applying the … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Staleness | Comments Off on OH1: Years-old information of trafficking with current info of personal use isn’t PC for trafficking

C.D.Ill.: Failure to execute state SW in 10 days doesn’t automatically trigger exclusionary rule

Failure to execute a state search warrant within 10 days (F.R.Crim.P. 41) where state law says 60 days does not automatically trigger the exclusionary rule. The affidavit for the warrant showed probable cause, and the good faith exception also applies. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Failure to execute state SW in 10 days doesn’t automatically trigger exclusionary rule

CA8: Taking box off FedEx conveyor belt for dog sniff didn’t deprive FedEx of custody

Moving a suspicious looking box from the FedEx conveyor belt to a back room for a dog sniff did not require reasonable suspicion nor did it deprive FedEx of custody of the box. The dog alert provided justification for a … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Mail and packages, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Taking box off FedEx conveyor belt for dog sniff didn’t deprive FedEx of custody