Category Archives: Attenuation

CA5: 4A doesn’t require officer have an arrest warrant in hand or to have even read it

There is no Fourth Amendment requirement that the officer have read or have in hand an arrest warrant. United States v. Moore, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19668 (5th Cir. Aug. 6, 2024). The officers’ use of force here was reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation, Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: 4A doesn’t require officer have an arrest warrant in hand or to have even read it

DC: Illegal stop led to finding weapon, and it was not attenuated

Defendant was subjected to a stop that violated the Fourth Amendment. Information from that stop sufficiently led to a search of a dwelling producing a gun. That was fruit of the poisonous tree. There was a first search that could … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on DC: Illegal stop led to finding weapon, and it was not attenuated

CA4: Unlocking a door to police knocks and opening it slightly is not consent to enter

Unlocking a door, here that opens out, when the police are knocking is not implied consent to enter. Quinn v. Zerkle, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19154 (4th Cir. Aug. 1, 2024). There was a reckless geographical error in the affidavit … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Consent, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Unlocking a door to police knocks and opening it slightly is not consent to enter

D.Ariz.: “The standard for probable cause in forfeiture proceedings resembles that required to support a search warrant”

“‘The standard for probable cause in forfeiture proceedings resembles that required to support a search warrant. The determination of probable cause is based upon a “totality of the circumstances” test, and the government’s evidence must be more than that which … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Forfeiture, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: “The standard for probable cause in forfeiture proceedings resembles that required to support a search warrant”

OH1: Inadvertence for plain view is a fact question

The inadvertence requirement of plain view here was a fact question. Police showed up on a wellness check about an allegedly suicidal person. Here it was a syringe cap that led to finding the syringe. State v. Hyatt, 2024-Ohio-2422 (1st … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Burden of proof, Dog sniff, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH1: Inadvertence for plain view is a fact question

CA2: Unlicensed and uninsured motorcycle parked on street was subject to community caretaking function when def was arrested

“Because Owens’s motorcycle was on a public street with no displayed license plate and was uninsured, the community caretaking function applied, even though it was parked at the time of his arrest.” Owens v. Fitzgerald, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 12292 … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Community caretaking function, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA2: Unlicensed and uninsured motorcycle parked on street was subject to community caretaking function when def was arrested

NM: New crime after alleged illegal seizure not suppressed

Defendant’s new crimes after his alleged illegal seizure are not suppressed. State v. Morgan, 2024 N.M. App. LEXIS 23 (May 13, 2024). Tossing a backpack in flight from the police is abandonment. United States v. Anderson, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Attenuation, geofence, Inevitable discovery, Inventory | Comments Off on NM: New crime after alleged illegal seizure not suppressed

E.D.Cal.: Smell of MJ still PC in a California National Park even though not under state law

The smell of marijuana from a car is no longer probable cause under California law, but it is still in a national park. United States v. Tolmosoff, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83134 (E.D. Cal. May 7, 2024). Defendant wasn’t seized … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Smell of MJ still PC in a California National Park even though not under state law

NY3: Entry into def’s stairwell was apparently illegal, but officers knocked at the door at the top of the stairs and got consent; this was attenuated

Officers entered the stairwell up to defendant’s second floor apartment. It was contended that the entry was unreasonable because the stairwell was part of defendant’s tenancy. At the top of the stairs, however, officers knocked and gained consent to enter. … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on NY3: Entry into def’s stairwell was apparently illegal, but officers knocked at the door at the top of the stairs and got consent; this was attenuated

UT: Being hospitalized having been shot by police isn’t “custody” for Miranda purposes

A person hospitalized after having been shot by the police is not per se “in custody” for Miranda purposes. The reason for the shooting was the safety of the officers and others, not custody. Tennessee v. Garner isn’t even close, … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Custody, Particularity, Standing | Comments Off on UT: Being hospitalized having been shot by police isn’t “custody” for Miranda purposes

E.D.Va.: Unreasonableness of pulling firearm during stop not causally connected to finding of drugs

The officer’s alleged excessive force in allegedly unnecessarily pulling his service weapon during defendant’s stop is not causally connected to the finding of the drugs (see Hudson), so the exclusionary rule does not apply. United States v. Coe, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Excessive force | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Unreasonableness of pulling firearm during stop not causally connected to finding of drugs

E.D.N.Y.: Even if Brooklyn checkpoint was unreasonable, def’s flight from it was intervening circumstance

NYPD set up a vehicle checkpoint in East Flatbush, Brooklyn, because of heavy traffic and crime in general. Every third vehicle was to be stopped except anything apparently a violation would cause a stop. Defendant was stopped for no front … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Issue preclusion, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Even if Brooklyn checkpoint was unreasonable, def’s flight from it was intervening circumstance

TX: New crime in resisting illegal arrest doesn’t depend on gravity of the new offense

Appellant resisted an illegal patdown and was Tased and charged with obstruction and resisting. A new offense is an intervening circumstance under Brown, and it doesn’t matter whether it is “serious” or not. Massey v. State, 2023 Tex. Crim. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Informant hearsay, Protective sweep | Comments Off on TX: New crime in resisting illegal arrest doesn’t depend on gravity of the new offense

E.D.Mo.: Attenuation doctrine can apply to a Rodriguez violation

The attenuation doctrine can apply to a Rodriguez violation. United States v. Wright, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 203269 (E.D. Mo. Nov. 8, 2022). On the surface, there was no reasonable suspicion for extending this stop. The court sets a hearing. … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Attenuation doctrine can apply to a Rodriguez violation

D.D.C.: When stop was extended without RS, def’s assault on officers was not attenuated under Brown

The court finds the stop without reasonable suspicion. It was allegedly justified by paper LPN that didn’t match the car as without reasonable suspicion because the tags weren’t run until after the stop. That and other factors don’t make reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.D.C.: When stop was extended without RS, def’s assault on officers was not attenuated under Brown

TX13: Stop was consensual but became unreasonable

“We therefore conclude that, although appellant’s encounter with police may have been consensual initially, it advanced into a ‘seizure’ for Fourth Amendment purposes before appellant made any incriminating statements. Because there was no warrant, reasonable suspicion, or probable cause to … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX13: Stop was consensual but became unreasonable

WY: Flight broke any causal connection between unlawful stop and later search of person

Evidence supporting defendant’s charges was admissible under the attenuation doctrine. His flight and the circumstances surrounding his flight broke the causal connection between the alleged unlawful police conduct and the evidence supporting his charges. Also, where the trial court denied … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WY: Flight broke any causal connection between unlawful stop and later search of person

E.D.N.Y.: Attenuation doctrine applies to this SEC interview; in dicta, no 4A violation

Even assuming the exclusionary rule applies to the SEC in this case, the attenuation doctrine applies. There is no direct or indirect evidence derived from the SEC’s action. As to the direct, “The Court finds that, even if the exclusionary … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Attenuation doctrine applies to this SEC interview; in dicta, no 4A violation

AL adopts new crime exception to exclusionary rule

When being arrested, defendant pulled away from officers in his room and dove for his bed and reached under a pillow. Officers thought he was going for a gun, and a melee ensued. He was charged with assault and resisting … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule, Independent source | Comments Off on AL adopts new crime exception to exclusionary rule

CA6 explains inevitable discovery and how it was confused here with attenuation

The district court erred by analyzing the search as attenuation when it should have been inevitable discovery, and that’s on the lawyers for not having filed adequate briefs. The court gives a thorough and helpful explanation of both and how … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA6 explains inevitable discovery and how it was confused here with attenuation