Category Archives: Plain view, feel, smell

WA: Warning of right to refuse consent search only applies to knock-and-talk

Warning of a right to refuse a consent search is only required for knock-and-talk. This was an animal cruelty case, and officers had been there repeatedly to observe horses with consent. Finally, they got a warrant to enter the enclosure … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Knock and talk, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on WA: Warning of right to refuse consent search only applies to knock-and-talk

TN: That officer can’t tell difference between hemp and marijuana doesn’t mean there wasn’t PC from plain smell

The fact the officer can’t tell the difference between hemp and marijuana doesn’t mean there wasn’t probable cause by plain smell. The stop was justified by the community caretaking function because he was asleep at an intersection. State v. Jones, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: That officer can’t tell difference between hemp and marijuana doesn’t mean there wasn’t PC from plain smell

OR: Officer’s use of a flashlight to facilitate a plan view at night was reasonable

The officer’s use of a flashlight to facilitate a plan view at night was reasonable. State v. Starr, 337 Or. App. 682 (Feb. 12, 2025).* There was probable cause to believe blood on the cell phone was defendant’s justifying the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OR: Officer’s use of a flashlight to facilitate a plan view at night was reasonable

E.D.Va.: Fact def was armed when SW for firearms was executed didn’t preclude further search for firearms

The affidavit for search warrant was particular for firearms based on threatening social media posts. When the search occurred, defendant was armed, but there was probable cause there could be other firearms on the premises. United States v. Rui Jiang, … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Fact def was armed when SW for firearms was executed didn’t preclude further search for firearms

CA9: Knock-and-announce failure doesn’t lead to suppression

Knock-and-announce failure doesn’t lead to suppression. United States v. Benlevi, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 2452 (9th Cir. Feb. 4, 2025). Police were called to a motel where a vehicle was illegally parked in a handicapped zone for an hour allegedly … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Knock and announce, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Knock-and-announce failure doesn’t lead to suppression

CA3: There is no REP in the exterior of a package in transit

The initial detention and exterior inspection of the parcel sent to defendant did not implicate his Fourth Amendment rights because it occurred within the guaranteed delivery window. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the exterior of the parcel … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Motion to suppress, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: There is no REP in the exterior of a package in transit

E.D.Mo.: Putting def’s cell phone into airplane mode wasn’t a search

Putting defendant’s cell phone into airplane mode wasn’t a search. The name “Red” was seen on the screen. There was independent probable cause for the cell phone warrant. United States v. Hudson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14952 (E.D. Mo. Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Independent source, Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Putting def’s cell phone into airplane mode wasn’t a search

AR: “[T]he exclusionary rule—absent a showing of bad faith—does not apply in a revocation hearing.”

“[T]he exclusionary rule—absent a showing of bad faith—does not apply in a revocation hearing.” Wallace v. State, 2025 Ark. App. 19 (Jan. 15, 2025). An officer on patrol in a motel parking lot saw defendant’s car. They drove past each … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Warrant papers | Comments Off on AR: “[T]he exclusionary rule—absent a showing of bad faith—does not apply in a revocation hearing.”

CA1: Report of a dead body in a house for a day didn’t justify warrantless entry

The police entered defendant’s home on a report of a dead body inside. They knew, however, the person was dead at least a day and likely wasn’t inside the home by then. The emergency exception did not apply. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA1: Report of a dead body in a house for a day didn’t justify warrantless entry

M.D.Pa.: Despite state MMJ, smell of MJ still PC under federal law

Despite medical marijuana being legal in this state, the smell of marijuana from a car is still probable cause under federal law. United States v. Skouras, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 2, 2025):

Posted in Conflict of laws, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Despite state MMJ, smell of MJ still PC under federal law

CA5: Where 4A claim undecided below, it doesn’t form basis for stay

In the appeal of Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland, posted here, the Fifth Circuit doesn’t rely on the undecided Fourth Amendment claim in deciding on a stay. 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 32565 (5th Cir. Dec. 23, 2024).* The … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Where 4A claim undecided below, it doesn’t form basis for stay

NC: Knock-and-talk led to smell of MJ and attempt to bar the door, and that was exigency

The officer came to defendant’s door for a knock-and-talk about marijuana sales, and, when the door was opened, he could smell marijuana. Defendant shut the door and attempted to put a bar up to block access, and that was all … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on NC: Knock-and-talk led to smell of MJ and attempt to bar the door, and that was exigency

CA2: Plain view seizure of cell phone established by officers’ knowledge of role of cell phones in crime

The evidentiary value of a cell phone for plain view was established here because, when officers saw the phone, they’d been investigating a conspiracy involving cell phone for months. United States v. Kurland, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 32177 (2d Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Plain view seizure of cell phone established by officers’ knowledge of role of cell phones in crime

IL: Smell of raw cannabis from car in a recreational state is still PC

“In sum, we hold that the odor of raw cannabis coming from a vehicle being operated on an Illinois highway, alone, is sufficient to provide police officers, who are trained and experienced in distinguishing between burnt and raw cannabis, with … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IL: Smell of raw cannabis from car in a recreational state is still PC

E.D.Wis.: Ptf’s claim judge’s signature on SW was forged fails for not even alleging there was a search

“The plaintiff similarly alleges that Miller forged a judge’s signature on a search warrant. But he does not say anything else about this search warrant. Did law enforcement execute the search warrant? What, or where, did they search? Did they … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Ptf’s claim judge’s signature on SW was forged fails for not even alleging there was a search

MO: Plain error doesn’t revive a waived search claim

Defendant didn’t object pretrial or at trial to the search, and he can’t argue plain error now. State v. Lane, 2024 Mo. App. LEXIS 837 (Nov. 19, 2024). The finding defendant was stopped because of a seatbelt violation is not … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Mistake of law, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: Plain error doesn’t revive a waived search claim

PA: Merely reaching in car to secure gun in plain view was reasonable under state’s more stringent automobile exception

It was reasonable for the officer to reach in an open door and secure a gun seen in plain view under Pennsylvania’s more stringent automobile exception. Commonwealth v. Saunders, 2024 Pa. LEXIS 1734 (Nov. 20, 2024) (and there’s three opinions; … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, State constitution | Comments Off on PA: Merely reaching in car to secure gun in plain view was reasonable under state’s more stringent automobile exception

D.Mont.: Off-roading during fire restriction was RS

Reasonable suspicion and a park violation: “Accordingly, Sergeant Call’s 11 years of experience in Park County coupled with his knowledge of state and county law gave him reason to suspect that Mitchell was potentially engaged in criminal conduct—namely, trespassing and … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Off-roading during fire restriction was RS

Reason: Dallas Voters Nix an All-Purpose Excuse for Police Harassment: ‘I Smelled Marijuana’

Reason: Dallas Voters Nix an All-Purpose Excuse for Police Harassment: ‘I Smelled Marijuana’ by Jacob Sullum (“The ballot initiative says a whiff of weed does not establish probable cause for a search or seizure, which was already doubtful in light … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on Reason: Dallas Voters Nix an All-Purpose Excuse for Police Harassment: ‘I Smelled Marijuana’

FL1: Lack of candor in appeal brief earns admonition

Affirmed per curiam. The concurring opinion: The facts concerning the stop and search in the appeal brief demonstrate a serious lack of candor which the state didn’t even challenge. All counsel included was his cross-examination and omitted the state’s direct … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on FL1: Lack of candor in appeal brief earns admonition