Category Archives: Cell phones

NY Kings Co.: The logic that people always have their cell phones on them is enough for nexus to get this SW

Defendant was arrested two days after a shooting. A search warrant was obtained for his cell phone. He resisted because there was no allegation he had the phone on him at the time of the shooting. Essentially, people always have … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Nexus | Comments Off on NY Kings Co.: The logic that people always have their cell phones on them is enough for nexus to get this SW

M.D.Pa.: Cut-and-paste errors and delay in execution and discovery results in suppression of cell phone

A Franks violation from cut-and-paste of another cell phone search affidavit resulted in serious factual errors in this one. Coupled with the government’s late disclosure of the phone’s contents despite a date certain trial, the court concludes the exclusionary rule … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Cut-and-paste errors and delay in execution and discovery results in suppression of cell phone

UT: Prosecutor’s trial comment on def’s refusal to give passcode to phone violated 5A

Defendant refused to reveal the passcode to his cell phone, and the police never got into it. He was charged with kidnapping, and he claimed that there was no kidnapping and that she consented to come with him. At trial, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on UT: Prosecutor’s trial comment on def’s refusal to give passcode to phone violated 5A

CA2: Pending 2255 petition justifies denial of Rule 41(g) petition

The business’s petition for return of records obtained by search warrant and grand jury subpoena is denied. The business’s principal is still litigating his criminal case and a 2255 is pending, and that justifies it. Allen v. Grist Mill Capital … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth, Qualified immunity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA2: Pending 2255 petition justifies denial of Rule 41(g) petition

LA3: Cell phone ping to locate def in a shooting investigation was exigent

“In our view, the trial court did not err in finding that exigent circumstances justified the warrantless procurement of Defendant’s cell-site information. Defendant was attempting to flee from the investigation of this violent crime, [and there was a serious risk … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA3: Cell phone ping to locate def in a shooting investigation was exigent

D.P.R.: Cell phone records obtained by SW not self-authenticating as evidence under 902(11)

Cell phone records obtained by warrant are not self-authenticating under F.R.E. 902(11). More will be required. United States v. Charbonier-Laureano, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218249 (D.P.R. Dec. 5, 2023). The government’s knowledge fraud co-conspirators communicated by cell phone during period … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Cell phone records obtained by SW not self-authenticating as evidence under 902(11)

E.D.Cal.: Possession of enough to be a MJ distributor was PC even in a legal use state

The stop was justified because the taillights were “smoked out” and one couldn’t adequately see them. During the stop, the officer smelled marijuana, but he didn’t act on that alone. He asked questions, saw the medical marijuana card, but he … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Possession of enough to be a MJ distributor was PC even in a legal use state

ND: It was unreasonable for police to think landowner who rented bedroom to another could consent to its search

Defendant stayed in a bedroom in another’s house, and he paid rent. It was unreasonable for officers to conclude that the homeowner could consent to search of the room. Also, the door to the room was closed when the police … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness | Comments Off on ND: It was unreasonable for police to think landowner who rented bedroom to another could consent to its search

CA5: Siccing police dog on woman in mental health crisis was excessive force; no crime involved

“Without any further attempts to subdue Sligh without the use of a dog bite, and without providing Sligh any warning that she may be subjected to a dog bite if she did not comply, Sutton sicced a dog on a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA5: Siccing police dog on woman in mental health crisis was excessive force; no crime involved

S.D.Fla.: Scrolling through electronic devices at the border is reasonable in CA11

Merely scrolling through an electronic device at the border is a reasonable border search. United States v. Vrdoljak, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208332 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 20, 2023). The officer was incidentally following defendant, and he observed her driving within … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Scrolling through electronic devices at the border is reasonable in CA11

N.D.Iowa: Even though stop showed def wasn’t impaired, DL and LPN could still be run

Even though defendant apparently wasn’t driving impaired, once validly stopped, the officer could run DL and LPN checks. The dog sniff didn’t prolong the stop at all. United States v. Drayton, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206461 (N.D. Iowa Oct. 10, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Even though stop showed def wasn’t impaired, DL and LPN could still be run

S.D.N.Y.: If the SW lacks PC, the remedy is a motion to suppress, not a motion to rescind the SW via 41(g)

Defendant filed a motion for the court to rescind the search warrant for his cell phone under Rule 41(g) because it was allegedly defective. The remedy is a motion to suppress, not to rescind. United States v. Cardenas, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: If the SW lacks PC, the remedy is a motion to suppress, not a motion to rescind the SW via 41(g)

CA5: After a fire at def’s trailer, his false statements as to his whereabouts added to PC for SW for cell phone

Defendant lived at a trailer that burned, and a body was found inside. After it was determined that he gave false information about his whereabouts that day, state officers got a search warrant for his cell phone and location information. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA5: After a fire at def’s trailer, his false statements as to his whereabouts added to PC for SW for cell phone

D.Vt.: Delay in searching one cell phone here leads to suppression but not as to a second one

Considering the four factors to consider in the delay in searching defendant’s cell phone, all the factors favor him. As to the exclusionary rule, “Because there is an ‘appreciable deterrent value’ in suppressing the evidence from the 9/15/22 Warrant, as … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, E-mail, Pretext | Comments Off on D.Vt.: Delay in searching one cell phone here leads to suppression but not as to a second one

N.D.Tex.: Protective sweep of meth lab property was objectively reasonable

The officers’ protective sweep of a property with a working meth lab was objectively reasonable. United States v. Moreno, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201424 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 9, 2023). Defendant’s cell phone was used during the period the rape victim … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Protective sweep of meth lab property was objectively reasonable

NYT: CIA officer’s cell phone search case pled yesterday

The cell phone search case of the CIA officer noted here from two weeks ago resulted in a guilty plea yesterday to some counts. NYT: Former C.I.A. Officer Pleads Guilty to Sexual Abuse Charges (“The former officer, Brian Jeffrey Raymond, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on NYT: CIA officer’s cell phone search case pled yesterday

OH11: Person seeking return of property seized need not provide actual evidence in the petition

In a petition for return of property seized from a business, it was only required to show a possessory interest and likelihood of return. An evidentiary quality response isn’t required. State v. Allen, 2023-Ohio-4032, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 3869 (11th … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OH11: Person seeking return of property seized need not provide actual evidence in the petition

D.Nev.: Def can’t be conclusory attempting to show standing in a rented vehicle

Conclusory statement of standing in a rented vehicle fails without some proof. “Defendant’s expectation of privacy rests on his contention that he rented the Taurus on Turo and lacked knowledge of the possibly stolen character of the vehicle. But if … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Seizure, Stored Communications Act | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Def can’t be conclusory attempting to show standing in a rented vehicle

CA11: Gov’t adequately protected against A-C materials being searched in border search of Venezuelan attorney’s cell phone; “no privileged material was ever found”

Defendant was a Venezuelan attorney whose cell phone was searched at the border. He said there likely was privileged attorney-client information on his phone, but it was searched under a DHS protocols to safeguard privileged information and legal advice was … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Excessive force, Privileges | Comments Off on CA11: Gov’t adequately protected against A-C materials being searched in border search of Venezuelan attorney’s cell phone; “no privileged material was ever found”

D.D.C.: Telling def the SW for his phone required his passcode was unreasonable because it didn’t

Defendant was in U.S. diplomatic service in Mexico, and he was accused of sex with drugged women there. Proof was ultimately found on his phone with a search warrant on his return to the U.S. Officers returned to his hotel … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Telling def the SW for his phone required his passcode was unreasonable because it didn’t