Category Archives: Cell phones

D.Utah: Police slow walked traffic stop without RS

“The court concludes the officers delayed the stop beyond what the traffic-based mission reasonably demanded, both 1) as a result of a mistakes and a lack of reasonable diligence, and 2) to investigate their suspicions about Said and Saul. These … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Utah: Police slow walked traffic stop without RS

DC: Lights, coming out of car with hand on gun, and “Let me see your hands” was a seizure

This was a show of authority: “With the emergency lights activated, each officer exited the vehicle and yelled, ‘Let me see your hands’ and quickly approached Mr. Mitchell. Officer Phillip had a hand on her firearm while doing so. Officers … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Custody, Seizure | Comments Off on DC: Lights, coming out of car with hand on gun, and “Let me see your hands” was a seizure

FL3: Cell phone dump in civil case denied; no showing of need

In a civil case, the court granted a writ of certiorari against the trial court’s order permitting access to a party’s cell phone by forensic imaging. “We recognize, of course, that Swezy is not altogether foreclosed from seeking electronically stored … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on FL3: Cell phone dump in civil case denied; no showing of need

E.D.Va.: Must plead prejudice when delay of a cell phone SW is alleged

Defendant’s cell phone was validly seized by the police but they didn’t get a warrant until nine months later. He says it’s a “clear violation” of the Fourth Amendment but he doesn’t allege any prejudice. Denied. United States v. Campbell, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Must plead prejudice when delay of a cell phone SW is alleged

E.D.Wis.: SW for cell phones allowed seizure of others found on premises

In this cell phone search warrant case, the government could seize multiple cell phones found at defendant’s house, old phones and others not named when they were found. Old phones and other phones could also have evidence on them. United … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: SW for cell phones allowed seizure of others found on premises

NY: Failure to show independent source for officer’s observation of def required reversal

“[H]ere, the People presented practically no testimony regarding the undercover officer’s observations of the seller’s appearance to support a determination that he had a sufficient independent basis to identify defendant in court. This error requires reversal. Because the record of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Independent source, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY: Failure to show independent source for officer’s observation of def required reversal

W.D.N.Y.: SW for devices used for video surveillance included cell phones because apps can be used to view cameras from cell phones

In a search warrant for devices capable of use in video surveillance, a cell phone qualified because apps on phones permitted home surveillance cameras (such as Ring doorbell cams) to be viewed on cell phones. United States v. Hampton, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Custody | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: SW for devices used for video surveillance included cell phones because apps can be used to view cameras from cell phones

FL1: Violation of state knock-and-announce statute requires suppression; Hudson not followed

Violation of the state knock-and-announce statute required suppression. Officers entered with haste and didn’t give defendant the chance to surrender peaceably to the search. The statute is a century old, and it serves important privacy interests. The state’s claim that … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Knock and announce, Standing | Comments Off on FL1: Violation of state knock-and-announce statute requires suppression; Hudson not followed

N.D.Ala.: All parts of a SW are read in context, and that narrows it so it’s not overbroad

Defendant seizes on one sentence in the search warrant to contend that it was overbroad. Under Andresen, parts of warrants are read in context. In context, it was not overbroad. United States v. Canaday, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64639 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Overbreadth | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: All parts of a SW are read in context, and that narrows it so it’s not overbroad

CA9: Compelled use of fingerprint to open a cell phone didn’t violate 5A

Police forcing defendant parolee to use his fingerprint to open his cell phone was not testimonial under the Fifth Amendment. It was “cognitive exertion” and akin to taking DNA or a blood draw. United States v. Payne, 2024 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on CA9: Compelled use of fingerprint to open a cell phone didn’t violate 5A

TX2: No SW needed to get IMEI number of an abandoned cell phone to trace the owner

“Officers may open a cell phone abandoned at a crime scene to view non-electronic identifying information, such as the phone’s international mobile equipment identification (IMEI) number, and then use that identifying information to obtain a search warrant for the phone’s … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on TX2: No SW needed to get IMEI number of an abandoned cell phone to trace the owner

S.D.N.Y.: GJ subpoena for cell phone passcode quashed.

The government’s grand jury subpoena for defendant’s cell phone passcode is quashed because it seeks testimonial information in violation of the Fifth Amendment showing defendant’s knowledge of the contents of the phone. “The Court denies Gray’s Rule 41(g) motion. Even … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: GJ subpoena for cell phone passcode quashed.

S.D.N.Y.: There’s a privacy interest in a cell phone passcode, but its disclosure here under a ruse does not lead to suppression

There is a privacy interest in one’s cell phone passode protected by the Fifth Amendment. Here, however, defendant’s disclosure of the passcode in responding to a CBP ruse after a flight from Mexico was not compulsion. United States v. Shvartsman, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: There’s a privacy interest in a cell phone passcode, but its disclosure here under a ruse does not lead to suppression

CA8: 5-day delay between seizure of a cell phone and the SW to get into it was reasonable

A five-day delay between seizure of a cell phone and the search warrant to get into it was reasonable. United States v. Thomas, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 8165 (8th Cir. Apr. 5, 2024). “Considering the factors outlined in Golinveaux, Schnitker’s … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Consent, DNA | Comments Off on CA8: 5-day delay between seizure of a cell phone and the SW to get into it was reasonable

NV: The state’s ability to seize a cell phone with exigency doesn’t include the power to search it

The ability to seize a cell phone with exigent circumstances doesn’t include the state’s ability to search it without a warrant. Smith v. State, 2024 Nev. LEXIS 14 (Mar. 28, 2024). Defendant wasn’t seized when the officer first approached him. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Inventory, Seizure | Comments Off on NV: The state’s ability to seize a cell phone with exigency doesn’t include the power to search it

E.D.N.Y.: Seizure of def’s cell phone in South Africa by their police does not “shock the conscience” or show virtual agency

“The court must first begin with a discussion of the initial seizure of Chang’s cellphone by South African authorities on December 29, 2018. Under the ‘international silver platter doctrine,’ the U.S. can generally receive evidence obtained by foreign authorities with … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Foreign searches, Issue preclusion, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Seizure of def’s cell phone in South Africa by their police does not “shock the conscience” or show virtual agency

E.D.Cal.: Stop for expired registration during Covid extension of time to register cars was objectively unreasonable

The stop of defendant’s car for expired tags but within the period of the state’s Covid executive order extending time to register cars was objectively not reasonable, even where the officer was unaware of the meaning of the EO. United … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Stop for expired registration during Covid extension of time to register cars was objectively unreasonable

WA: Parole search of cell phone was reasonable

Defendant was on supervision for a sex offense. He was required to disclose all his dating relationships. A parole search of his cell phone was reasonable, and it revealed other violations. In re Pers. Restraint of Allgoewer, 2024 Wash. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WA: Parole search of cell phone was reasonable

IN: Cell phone linked to murder by TM sent before; PC for search

Defendant’s cell phone was linked to the murder by a witness saying that the meet was set up by text messages and more. Banks v. State, 2024 Ind. App. LEXIS 66 (Mar. 15, 2024):

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: Cell phone linked to murder by TM sent before; PC for search

GA: SW for marijuana supported plain view seizure of firearms, ammunition, and body armor

Police had a search warrant for marijuana. “[E]ven if the seizure of the firearms, ammunition, and body armor is not within the scope of the warrant, we agree with the State that law enforcement was authorized to seize these items … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell, Scope of search | Comments Off on GA: SW for marijuana supported plain view seizure of firearms, ammunition, and body armor