Category Archives: Informant hearsay

S.D.N.Y.: Legal mail can be copied for inmate to guard against disguised legal mail

Prisons can copy legal mail in presence of the inmate to guard against contraband coming in disguised as legal mail. Prisoners’ Legal Servs. of N.Y. v. United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195443 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 5, … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Informant hearsay, Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Legal mail can be copied for inmate to guard against disguised legal mail

D.Kan.: Affidavit emailed with SW to judge was considered “attached”

In overcoming a warrant particularity challenge cured by the affidavit, the government satisfied its burden that the affidavits in support of the warrant were emailed to the issuing judge as two pdf files in the same email. They weren’t, of … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Affidavit emailed with SW to judge was considered “attached”

N.D.Ohio: Def’s own statement can be PC without having to prove it

No case says that officers can’t rely on defendant’s own statement when relying on it as probable cause. They don’t have to prove it up. United States v. Alexander, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185275 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 22, 2025). “Sales’ … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Def’s own statement can be PC without having to prove it

OH1: Controlled buy that led to SW admissible as 404(b)

The state succeeded in admitting as 404(b) evidence the controlled buy that led to the search warrant to “tell[ ] the story of these crimes.” It was presented on appeal as plain error, but it was held not to be … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OH1: Controlled buy that led to SW admissible as 404(b)

D.Mass.: Foreign law enforcement agency could be credited as informant

A tip from a foreign law enforcement agency about a Massachusetts IP address trading in CSAM could be credited for probable cause. United States v. Shacar, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165584 (D. Mass. Aug. 26, 2025). Because the CI’s role … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Foreign law enforcement agency could be credited as informant

DE: No IAC claim where challenged evidence never used at trial

There is no ineffective assistance of counsel claim for not pursuing a Fourth Amendment claim where the product of the search was not used at trial. State v. Finney, 2025 Del. Super. LEXIS 404 (Aug. 18, 2025). Crime victims are … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Mootness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on DE: No IAC claim where challenged evidence never used at trial

Guam case shows: Don’t cross examine about the CI without a clear goal in mind

This started with a CI for a search warrant, but the hearing on the motion to suppress revealed there were actually three others. That information was outside the “four corners” but it cemented the probable cause. Guam v. Guerrero, 2025 … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Guam case shows: Don’t cross examine about the CI without a clear goal in mind

CA10: Loud exhaust stop led to valid, albeit mixed motive, warrant arrest and inventory

Defendant’s loud exhaust led to his stop and then finding a warrant which led to his arrest and inventory which turned up fentanyl and a gun. “And although the officers decided to arrest Ulibarri for two reasons-properly for the bench … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Loud exhaust stop led to valid, albeit mixed motive, warrant arrest and inventory

MS: The CIs were co-conspirators and eyewitnesses and could be credited

The three informants were co-conspirators, eyewitnesses, and participants in the crime, and their information could be credited for search warrant. Taylor v. State, 2025 Miss. App. LEXIS 292 (Aug. 12, 2025). Defendant’s 2255 re-raises his Fourth Amendment claim already rejected. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: The CIs were co-conspirators and eyewitnesses and could be credited

MI: Two controlled buys where def left house to do it and returned was PC for house

The informant’s information here [to me] was conclusorily stated by the officer to be reliable [not discussed], except there were also two controlled buys from the defendant where he left his place and returned. [The latter is enough.] People v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on MI: Two controlled buys where def left house to do it and returned was PC for house

CA5: “Fill in the blanks” arrest affidavit still showed PC

The “fill in the blanks” arrest affidavit for the Waco Twin Peaks biker shootout wasn’t fatally defective. What facts it had showed probable cause. Barnhart v. Stroman, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 19740 (5th Cir. Aug. 5, 2025). Based on a … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: “Fill in the blanks” arrest affidavit still showed PC

W.D.Mo.: Unidentified tipster corroborated by hand-to-hand transactions

The unidentified tipster was corroborated by defendant’s hand-to-hand transactions during surveillance, and that was probable cause. United States v. Mangol, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130023 (W.D. Mo. May 23, 2025). Defendant sought to use the GPS information on his trailer … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Voluntariness | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Unidentified tipster corroborated by hand-to-hand transactions

Reason: Denver Case Highlights the Potentially Deadly Hazards of Police Raids Based on Secondhand Information

Reason: Denver Case Highlights the Potentially Deadly Hazards of Police Raids Based on Secondhand Information by Jacob Sullum (“Michael Mendenhall wants the Supreme Court to reconsider a precedent that allows home invasions based on nothing but hearsay.”). Cert. petitions almost … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on Reason: Denver Case Highlights the Potentially Deadly Hazards of Police Raids Based on Secondhand Information

NM: Aguilar-Spinelli are still followed here and they were satisfied

Aguilar-Spinelli is still followed in New Mexico, and its strictures were met here. Motion to suppress properly denied, and court of appeals reversed. State v. Perea, 2025 N.M. LEXIS 91 (June 5, 2025):

Posted in Informant hearsay, State constitution | Comments Off on NM: Aguilar-Spinelli are still followed here and they were satisfied

CA9: No warrant required for CI to record def

No warrant was required for the CI to record defendant, following White (1971). United States v. Sudbury, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13921 (9th Cir. June 6, 2025). The state can’t be compelled to seek to unseal the CI’s testimony for … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Waiver | Comments Off on CA9: No warrant required for CI to record def

E.D.Va.: Lack of a recording for SW application in violation of state law didn’t violate 4A

There was no recording of the showing of probable cause for this state warrant that became a part of a federal prosecution. The lack of a recording isn’t fatal to the showing of probable cause found by the issuing magistrate … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Neutral and detached magistrate, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Lack of a recording for SW application in violation of state law didn’t violate 4A

MO: Uncorroborated anonymous tip wasn’t PC and GFE doesn’t apply

Uncorroborated anonymous tip: “Because the affidavit relies almost entirely on an uncorroborated anonymous tip and includes no information regarding the tipster’s reliability or the specific details of the anonymous tip, it failed to supply the warrant-issuing judge with a reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MO: Uncorroborated anonymous tip wasn’t PC and GFE doesn’t apply

MI: Lifetime electronic monitoring of this sex offender on parole not 4A violation

Lifetime electronic monitoring of this sex offender when on parole doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. People v. Van Mai, 2025 Mich. App. LEXIS 3912 (May 20, 2025). DUI checkpoint: “The only issue Defendant raises is whether the check point was … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Informant hearsay, Roadblocks, Waiver | Comments Off on MI: Lifetime electronic monitoring of this sex offender on parole not 4A violation

CA6: Affidavit about smell of MJ from house was not so bare bones GFE didn’t apply

“Even if the search-warrant affidavit at issue lacked probable cause, the district court did not err in denying Noble’s motion to suppress because the good-faith exception applies. The search-warrant affidavit is not bare bones.” The smell of marijuana coming from … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA6: Affidavit about smell of MJ from house was not so bare bones GFE didn’t apply

WA: 911 call about following a DUI was RS for stop

Officers could rely on a 911 call about an alleged drunk driver who was reporting what she was seeing. “Law enforcement officers may effectuate a Terry stop based on a 911 caller’s tip when the tip is reliable and contains … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Waiver | Comments Off on WA: 911 call about following a DUI was RS for stop